<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32770">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32770</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32811" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-23T02:50:48Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32811">
    <title>In vitro evaluation of eucalyptol softened and vertically compacted gutta-percha for root canal obturation</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32811</link>
    <description>Title: In vitro evaluation of eucalyptol softened and vertically compacted gutta-percha for root canal obturation
Abstract: The aim of this research was to compare modified gutta-percha obturating techniques&#xD;
with lateral condensation. A group of forty extracted human disto-buccal roots of&#xD;
maxillary molars were debrided and obturated. Root canal preparation was performed&#xD;
using the crown-down root canal preparation with nickel-titanium engine-driven and&#xD;
hand instruments. For obturation the teeth were divided into four groups often teeth each.&#xD;
The groups were obturated with cold laterally condensed gutta-percha, eucalyptol&#xD;
softened gutta-percha and lateral condensation, warm vertical compaction, and a&#xD;
combination of eucalyptol softened gutta-percha and warm vertical compaction.&#xD;
Obturation was evaluated using a radiographic method. Unfilled area was calculated by&#xD;
subtracting the obturated area from the root canal area measured after the canal was&#xD;
prepared. The areas were measured using a computer program. A millimetre grid was&#xD;
used with all the radiographs taken to set the scale. Another way to evaluate the&#xD;
obturation was by dye leakage and measurement of the ratio of unfilled and filled with&#xD;
sealer and gutta-percha on transversely sectioned root specimens. Area measurements on&#xD;
the transverse sections were done in a similar way to the radiographic measurements this&#xD;
time using a millimetre slide to set the scale.&#xD;
The radiographic analysis of the obturated teeth gave different results to the data obtained&#xD;
from the transverse sections. The radiographic data showed the vertical compaction and&#xD;
the combined eucalyptol and vertical compaction group to be a bettcr way to obturate the&#xD;
root canal (Vertical compaction: 88.6% obturated, P = 0.0324 t-test; Combined&#xD;
technique: 89.1 % obturated, P = 0.0267 t-test). The measured transverse sections showed&#xD;
that while at apical level the combined eucalyptol and vertical compaction technique was&#xD;
the best way to obturate the root canal (71.1 % gutta-percha, P = 0.0023; and 22.7% sealer&#xD;
P = 0.0002 t-tests) it was insufficient at the mid-root and coronal portions of the root&#xD;
canal. Large areas of sealer (37.9%; P == 0.0006 t-test) were found at mid-root level in&#xD;
both the techniques using the vertical compactor.
Description: M.PHIL.DENTAL SURGERY</description>
    <dc:date>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

