<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/41126">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/41126</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32705" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32703" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32699" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32682" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-04T21:18:43Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32705">
    <title>Method in the social teaching of the church</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32705</link>
    <description>Title: Method in the social teaching of the church
Abstract: When Leo XII dealt with the labour question, he raised the&#xD;
question and tried to solve it on the basis 'Of a theory of society, even&#xD;
if such a theory was moo:-e implied rather than explicitly stated. Pius XI&#xD;
was perhaps even more conscious than his predecessor ,of the need to&#xD;
approach the labour question in the context 'of an explicit social&#xD;
theory. Much of the criticism that was leveled in the sixties against&#xD;
the earlier social teaching tradition in the Catholic Church centered on&#xD;
the difficulties inherent in the concept of social systems in general. it was pointed out that human life is too complex a 'reality to fit any&#xD;
conceptual scheme and that history is continuously bringing new insights&#xD;
and technical possibilities which necessitate a critical and open&#xD;
attitude toward social systems.</description>
    <dc:date>1982-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32703">
    <title>Memory and forgetfulness : a theme of christian metaphysics</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32703</link>
    <description>Title: Memory and forgetfulness : a theme of christian metaphysics
Abstract: This paper aims at a critical theology of communications. It is&#xD;
based on Hegel's presentation of few point of the story of western metaphysics:&#xD;
Its inability to "hold on to death". The power ,of that critical&#xD;
presentation of the metaphysical-scientific project derives from a communicatively,&#xD;
i.e. relatingly conceived Absolute which has taken death,&#xD;
difference and finiteness into itself: Only by relating himself in finite&#xD;
terms, can God communicate adequately. In doing so, he tells not only&#xD;
his, but also the world's story. Presenting himself, he presents also the&#xD;
world's nature; placing critique, negation and death into his self, he&#xD;
criticizes death-forgetful and God-defensive mankind. In telling the&#xD;
world's story, a story which is forgetful .of death, and therefore defensive&#xD;
against the dying God, God tells his own story. Reminding man of himself,&#xD;
he also reminds of metaphysics' God-amnesia. The paper leans&#xD;
strongly .on Theunissen's theological Hegel-interpretation and argues on&#xD;
the basis of the "atheism", disclosed at the end of western metaphysics,&#xD;
as a constitutive moment of theological reflection. 'It is :critical of&#xD;
contemporary religions 'Of "meaning-bestowal" and "nomizing" "holiness",&#xD;
dmwing from the sociology of knowledge or from nineteenth century&#xD;
Kantianism. It is also critical of theologies standing close to' these&#xD;
movements. But this critique becomes apparent only toward the end&#xD;
of the paper, after the dialectic of memory and forgetfulness has been&#xD;
elaborated as a central issue of western metaphysics in the first part.&#xD;
The second shows how that dialectic is closely associated with the&#xD;
conception of a deathless God, which conception triggers the compensate:&#xD;
foreknowledge 'Of death and definite having been repressed, ideological&#xD;
meaning now has to be produced. The third part of the paper indicates&#xD;
how in Hegel's thought the termination of western metaphysics is disclosed&#xD;
with its inner logic. This logic is characterized by the intimate&#xD;
relation 'of God-amnesia and a 'repression ,of the knowledge of death.&#xD;
This dose association having been "elevated" as the inner working of&#xD;
western metaphysics at its end, the fourth part develops Hegel's theologic&#xD;
as a narrative source of critique, which in the fifth and final portion&#xD;
is shown to have trinitarian structure.</description>
    <dc:date>1982-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32699">
    <title>Melita Theologica : volume 33 : issue 1-2</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32699</link>
    <description>Title: Melita Theologica : volume 33 : issue 1-2
Abstract: 1/Forte, B. - La teologia Europea di fronte alle sfide del pensiero moderno e dei mutamenti ecclesiali -- 2/AHLERS, R. - Memory and forgetfulness: a theme of christian metaphysics -- 3/GRIMA, G. - Method in the social teaching of the church -- 4/SERRACINO INGLOTT, P. - The rights of future generations: some socio-philosophical considerations</description>
    <dc:date>1982-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32682">
    <title>The rights of future generations : some socio-philosophical considerations</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32682</link>
    <description>Title: The rights of future generations : some socio-philosophical considerations
Abstract: The American Philosophical Association, in the February 1973&#xD;
issue of its Bulletin (No. 14), :requested contributions on the topic: "Can&#xD;
it be asserted that future generations have rights, for example, to pure&#xD;
air?" The response raised two second-order questions: (a) why did the&#xD;
participants find so little explicit discussion of the problem to work&#xD;
upon? Cb) why did they find so much interest in it now?&#xD;
The paradox in the conjunction of these two questions is not very&#xD;
difficult to resolve:the problem has only become real recently. The&#xD;
reasons for its late emergence, however, may well deserve stating.</description>
    <dc:date>1982-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

