https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/41403 2026-04-27T03:15:54Z https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/36553 Title: Etica personalista, bioetica ed etica dell'ambiente Abstract: La persona assume il suo molo nella vita in rapporto agli altri se diviene capace di generare dei processi di personalizzazione intorno a se. Il suo compito non pub fermarsi alIa morale del dovere per il dovere, ma ad un agire tale da suscitare con gli altri una reciprocita d'intese. IntelIetto, sentimento, volonta concorrono ad intuire in modo creativo e circostanziato cib che pub generare legami significativi con una determinata persona, il suo mondo, i suoi valori, i suoi bisogni. 1991-01-01T00:00:00Z https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/36552 Title: Hegel's Encyclopedia of 1830 §40-51 : an exegesis : part 2 Abstract: This paper moves in three stages. In the first stage the relation of the 1830 Encyclopedia to Hegel's early writings is examined. In the second stage the author discussed the origin of this important work of Hegel. Melita Theologica is printing today the third stage of this paper where the author offers an exegesis of §§40-51 of the Encyclopedia of 1830. 1991-01-01T00:00:00Z https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/36551 Title: Meaning and speaker's intentions Abstract: In "Meaning and Truth" Strawson draws a contrast between what he calls "communication-intention theories" and "formal semantics theories" of meaning. According to the former it is impossible to give an adequate account of the concept of meaning without reference to the possession by speakers of audience-directed intentions of a certain complex kind. The opposite view is based on the thought that the sense of a sentence is determined by its truth-conditions. Strawson described the conflict between these two theories as a "Homeric struggle", and groups together Grice, Austin and the later Wittgenstein as exponents of the first type of theory, and Chomsky, Frege and the earlier Wittgenstein as exponents of the second. 1991-01-01T00:00:00Z https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/36550 Title: Was Ur-Markus the source for Lk. 19-15 : 20:47? Abstract: There is a growing consensus that the literary relationship of Luke to the other gospels is more complicated than previously thought. This was clearly evidenced by the Trinity College Colloquy of 1977 which first brought into focus the discontent that exists with the so-called two document, and Griesbach hypotheses. Now, a decade later, there is widespread unease among New Testament scholars with the accepted theories explaining the literary relation- ship of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. 1991-01-01T00:00:00Z