<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46157">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46157</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46163" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-11T11:30:27Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46163">
    <title>The Malta turn of Europe - the European Union in the age of globality</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46163</link>
    <description>Title: The Malta turn of Europe - the European Union in the age of globality
Abstract: Victor Hugo once described revolutions as a return from the artificial to normalcy. Certainly,&#xD;
revolutions are processes that unveil the unknown in history. Revolutions are revelations. 1989 was&#xD;
such a revelation in Europe. It changed the European perspective from Yalta to Malta, that is: from&#xD;
internal division to global exposure. The turn from Yalta to Malta was not only a semantic gag. It&#xD;
was also more than describing the end of the Cold War. To link Malta to Yalta was not a nice way&#xD;
for writing an obituary to a closed chapter in history. To the contrary, “Malta” opened a new chapter&#xD;
in the history of Europe. I call this fundamental fact “the Malta turn of Europe”. Most people which&#xD;
were living the political events of 1989 or were observing them from a distance did not instantly&#xD;
grasp the meaning of the political changes that happened across Central Europe. Two basic meanings&#xD;
were revealed by the history of 1989: a fundamental geopolitical change and a fundamental sociocultural&#xD;
change – and both were fundamentally interrelated. The fall of communist regimes that had&#xD;
been governing many societies was met with excitement and joy, sometimes even with disbelief and&#xD;
worry across the world. With hindsight knowledge, two facts remain evident: 1989 did not begin in&#xD;
1989 and it did not end with 1989. When we compare the fall of communist regimes in Europe with&#xD;
the French Revolution of 1789, we instantly realize the meaning of this thought: also 1789 did not&#xD;
begin in 1789 and it did not end with 1789. The French Revolution in its time went through periods&#xD;
of incubation. And it continued through several periods of transformation, of revolutions inside the&#xD;
revolution, of unexpected results and unintended consequences. The same was happening in Europe&#xD;
again two centuries later. Three insights remain fundamental to better contextualize 1989 and the&#xD;
Malta summit in that year that declared the Cold War dead.</description>
    <dc:date>2010-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

