<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46550">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46550</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46629" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46628" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46627" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46572" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-11T03:09:46Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46629">
    <title>Iran nuclear deal and European Union : the end of a myth?</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46629</link>
    <description>Title: Iran nuclear deal and European Union : the end of a myth?
Abstract: On the 2nd of April 2015, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action&#xD;
between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the P5+1 (the permanent&#xD;
members of the United Nations Security Council—the United States, the&#xD;
United Kingdom, Russia, France, and China—plus Germany) and the&#xD;
European Union, (known as JCPOA), was signed in Vienna, and was&#xD;
considered by the European Union as a personal victory. For the&#xD;
EU, JCPOA represented the living demonstration that its soft power&#xD;
was a reality and that this organization, without military means,&#xD;
was able to have a political and diplomatic weight upon the world.&#xD;
However, this agreement, reached despite so many difficulties,&#xD;
is now in turmoil under the Trump presidency. Is this model&#xD;
condemned?
Description: This document contains Notes on Authors, the Seminar Agenda, and a photo inset.</description>
    <dc:date>2018-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46628">
    <title>The vulnerable Iran nuclear deal : a failure in the two-level game</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46628</link>
    <description>Title: The vulnerable Iran nuclear deal : a failure in the two-level game
Abstract: Recent statements and decisions by the Trump Administration&#xD;
have signaled the Administration’s willingness to destabilize&#xD;
the Iran nuclear deal. These events have been viewed through a&#xD;
variety of lenses in an attempt to both understand why current&#xD;
decisions were made, but also in an attempt to predict future&#xD;
action. The Administration’s positions have been seen alternately&#xD;
as isolationist or heavy handed, as ignoring the international&#xD;
community and international commitments or putting America&#xD;
first. But the Trump administration’s ability to back away from an&#xD;
international obligation is founded in what I believe is a political not&#xD;
a policy failure. It reflects the inability of the Obama Administration&#xD;
to sell the Iran Nuclear deal to the American public and their&#xD;
elected representatives, in terms that made the vastly complicated&#xD;
technical deal comprehensible to a public whose attention span&#xD;
is limited. More importantly, the Obama Administration did not&#xD;
fulfill the requirements of two level negotiation needed to bring the&#xD;
internal political constituency onboard and to get them committed&#xD;
to the deal as the best alternative.</description>
    <dc:date>2018-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46627">
    <title>The Iran nuclear deal two years on : future unclear and getting worse</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46627</link>
    <description>Title: The Iran nuclear deal two years on : future unclear and getting worse
Abstract: The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was formally&#xD;
agreed on 14 July 2015 between Iran and the so-called E3/EU+3:&#xD;
United Kingdom, France, Germany, United States, Russia, China,&#xD;
and the European Union. It was a culmination of nearly two years of&#xD;
difficult negotiations, and is an extraordinarily complex document,&#xD;
spanning, with all its annexes, over a hundred pages. It ensures that&#xD;
Iran does not acquire nuclear weapons for 10-15 years in exchange&#xD;
for the easing of sanctions. The implementation is guaranteed by&#xD;
a comprehensive institutional framework and the most intrusive&#xD;
verification regime in the history of the International Atomic&#xD;
Energy Agency (IAEA).</description>
    <dc:date>2018-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46572">
    <title>What future for the Iran nuclear deal?</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/46572</link>
    <description>Title: What future for the Iran nuclear deal?
Abstract: Since the 2015 nuclear accord with Iran (Joint Comprehensive&#xD;
Plan of Action or JCPOA) was concluded, the International&#xD;
Atomic Energy Agency which is tasked with verification of its&#xD;
implementation has been regularly reporting that Iran has been&#xD;
adhering to the deal since it took effect1. Corresponding abolition&#xD;
of some sanctions and increased European economic ties to Iran&#xD;
followed, and the EU and the E3 - the EU countries involved in&#xD;
negotiating the deal - lauded the agreement as stabilizing the region,&#xD;
strengthening the transatlantic relations, and shoring up the global&#xD;
non-proliferation regime.&#xD;
Still, the future of the agreement between Iran and the five&#xD;
permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany is&#xD;
unclear and precarious. US President Trump in January 2018 set a&#xD;
120-day deadline (12th May 2018) for US lawmakers and European&#xD;
allies to “fix” the deal, one of President Obama’s main foreign policy&#xD;
achievements, otherwise the US would exit the agreement.</description>
    <dc:date>2018-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

