<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/63340">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/63340</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/43926" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-07-18T15:45:48Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/43926">
    <title>A comparison of organisational culture in two mental health rehabilitation facilities in Malta.</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/43926</link>
    <description>Title: A comparison of organisational culture in two mental health rehabilitation facilities in Malta.
Abstract: The purpose of this study is 10 compare the organisational culture of two&#xD;
rehabilitation facilities in the Maltese mental health care sector, namely, the Half-Way&#xD;
House in Mount Carmel Hospital (Attard) and Villa Chelsea in Birkirkara. The main&#xD;
proposition in this study is that, the different levels of functioning and management&#xD;
effectiveness are largely a function of the different organisational culture. Culture is&#xD;
defined in this study as the quality of perceived values, norms, beliefs and practices&#xD;
shared by managers and employees.&#xD;
To investigate the above, the study employed a triangulation design, comprising of&#xD;
both qualitative and quantitative assessment. Culture was assessed by questionnaires&#xD;
and observation ratings. The results were evaluated in the light of performance and&#xD;
attitude outcomes, as well as, management explanations on typical perceived cultural&#xD;
dimensions. The sample comprised all staff and management who participated in one&#xD;
or more assessment exercises.&#xD;
Results show that while both sites are theoretically aiming in the same organisational&#xD;
direction, there are differences between the sites, as well as, some incompatibilities&#xD;
within sites. These findings are discussed with reference to practical implications&#xD;
emerging from the results, and are compared and contrasted with the literature review&#xD;
and research findings. Recommendations and limitations are also elaborated upon.
Description: M.SC.HEALTH SERVICES MANGT.</description>
    <dc:date>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

