<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/63485">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/63485</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45612" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-11T14:23:39Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45612">
    <title>The use of chemotherapeutic agents in the prevention of periodontal disease.</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45612</link>
    <description>Title: The use of chemotherapeutic agents in the prevention of periodontal disease.
Abstract: In the introduction it was pointed out that a wealth of&#xD;
scientific evidence implicates the essential role microbial&#xD;
plaque plays in the etiology of periodontal disease ..&#xD;
The present concepts of the role of microbial plaque&#xD;
in the etiology of this disease were presented.. The oral&#xD;
microorganisms, their origin, pathogenicity, the environmental&#xD;
factors which influence them were described. The histopathology&#xD;
in the onset of periodontal disease and the relationship plaque&#xD;
microorganisms bears to it was put forward.&#xD;
The literature of Chlorherldine and antibiotics pertinent&#xD;
to their use in the prevention of periodontal disease was reviewed.&#xD;
Only three antibiotics were reviewed, namely Spiramycin, Vancomycin&#xD;
and CCl.0232.&#xD;
Studies with Spiramycin are extremely limited. One,&#xD;
uncontrolled, clinical study (Harvey, 1961} described promising&#xD;
results with this antibiotic in the field of preventive periodontics.&#xD;
A short-term, clinical trial on Syrian hamsters (Keyes et al, 1966)&#xD;
indicated that Spiramycin incorporated in the diet of these&#xD;
experimental animals controlled the development of periodontal&#xD;
lesions. Investigations with Spiramycin were carried no further.&#xD;
More studies have been carried out with Vancomycin.&#xD;
Clinical studies (Mitchell and Holmes, 1965; Mitchell et al, 1967;&#xD;
Scopp et al, 1967) pointed out that Vanoomyci.11 is useful in&#xD;
supporting conventional periodontal therapy. These studies were&#xD;
controlled and double-blind. A similar study (Mitchell and Barker,&#xD;
1968) recommended its use in the treatment of Acute .Necrotizing&#xD;
Ulcerative/Ulcerative Gingivitis. Studies carried out in Denmark (Loe et al,&#xD;
1967; Jensen et al, 1967; Jensen et al, 1969) carried out more&#xD;
sensitive clinical trials showing that Vancomycin was ineffective&#xD;
negative microorganisms, which alone were&#xD;
plaque and elicit gingivitis. These studies are more reliable in&#xD;
studying the earliest manifestations of the disease. An animal&#xD;
study al, 1966) that was more effective&#xD;
than Vancomycin in control of periodontal disease.&#xD;
CCl0232 was the only antimicrobial agent the five&#xD;
investigated which significantly controlled plaque and gingivitis.&#xD;
This human, controlled, double-blind clinical trial (Volpe et al,&#xD;
1969) followed a pattern similar to those carried out Aarhaus,&#xD;
Denmark by Loe and his associates. Results with Vancomycin, one of&#xD;
the agents investigated, agreed with those of Loe and his associates.&#xD;
A similar study (Stallard et al, 1969) agreed that CC10232 was&#xD;
effective in controlling plaque, calculus and • The&#xD;
effectiveness of CC10232 in controlling calculus was investigated&#xD;
in a twelve month clinical trial (Volpe et al, 1970). Results &#xD;
were promising. Schissal et al {1969) pointed out that this&#xD;
antibiotic depressed both Gram positive and Gram negative micro-organisms&#xD;
&#xD;
Chlorhexidine was investigated (Loe and Schiott, 1970;&#xD;
Schiott et al, 1970) shown in human, controlled, double-blind clinical trials to effectively' eliminate plaque and gingivitis.&#xD;
A study in vitro (Rolla et al, 1970) and in vivo (Davies et al,&#xD;
1970) showed that chlorhexidine reacted with tooth substance.&#xD;
These two studies were instigated&#xD;
the microbiological results in&#xD;
the previous study (Schiott et al, 1970) showing that though&#xD;
saliva marginal gingiva were colonized by bacteria the&#xD;
tooth surfaces were virtually free. Further work (Gjermo et al,&#xD;
1970) corroborated this finding by showing that effectiveness of&#xD;
eleven antimicrobial agents in plaque elimination was not related&#xD;
to their bactericidal properties in vitro.&#xD;
The study of chemotherapeutic agents in the prevention of&#xD;
periodontal disease is in its infancy. More human, well-controlled,&#xD;
clinical trials by different investigators using agreed criteria for&#xD;
sampling, assessing results etc are required. Long-term effects on&#xD;
the ecology of the oral microflora need considerably more&#xD;
investigation. As no specific system or microorganisms can be&#xD;
implicated in the development or plaque, the antimicrobials used&#xD;
have to be broad spectrum. This was displayed in the case of&#xD;
Vancomycin. Ir1duction of resistance and of superinfection of the&#xD;
oral microorganisms have to be investigated exhaustively as these&#xD;
agents have to be constantly used to be effective.
Description: DIP.PUB.DENT., University of Dundee; FOREIGN THESIS</description>
    <dc:date>1971-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

