<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74126">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74126</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74749" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74741" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74733" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74533" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-14T18:44:28Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74749">
    <title>Developing an enhanced video communication system between multidiscipline dispersed teams</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74749</link>
    <description>Title: Developing an enhanced video communication system between multidiscipline dispersed teams
Abstract: Today’s globalisation encourages several companies that are globally distributed to&#xD;
virtually collaborate on a common task to maximise time and money. This project&#xD;
includes a process improvement methodology which is the DMAIC (Define, Measure,&#xD;
Analyse, Improve, Control) process on a system that already exists at Methode&#xD;
Electronics Malta Ltd. This system, also known as the Hawk-Eye system, is used to&#xD;
video conference between Malta and Egypt to avoid experts in Malta having to travel to&#xD;
Egypt to solve issues with relation to maintenance and repair.&#xD;
The improvements are essential since presently this system does not encourage the user&#xD;
to make use of it, as most of the times there is misunderstanding and bad quality in&#xD;
communication techniques. Hence, the experts in Malta need to travel onsite. This&#xD;
results in a long downtime to solve issues and thus incurring travel expenses. The newly&#xD;
developed system was a gradual improvement of the current system by utilizing the five&#xD;
phases of the DMAIC methodology.&#xD;
The newly developed system was improved by considering both literature review and&#xD;
the DMAIC methodology. Different communication techniques and mediums where&#xD;
analysed in detail to identify and choose the correct elements for this particular system.&#xD;
It is important that the company’s and users’ needs are clear so that the system will meet&#xD;
their expectations and goals.&#xD;
By means of DMAIC process, the problem was first defined and was then followed by&#xD;
the Measure phase to identify the greatest limitations that the users are facing with the&#xD;
current system. In the Analyse phase, the data collected in the Measure phase and root&#xD;
causes of the limitations were analysed. Then the Improvement phase included the&#xD;
different elements to enhance the system with the help of the data collected and the&#xD;
literature review. Finally, the Control phase includes which techniques should be&#xD;
utilized so that the system remains in control and will be further improved. A number of&#xD;
different quality tools are used throughout the different phases of both the DMAIC such&#xD;
as the Cause and Effect diagram, Pareto Chart and Affinity Diagram.
Description: B.ENG (HONS)</description>
    <dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74741">
    <title>Two-component injection moulding of thermoset elastomer and rigid thermoplastic</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74741</link>
    <description>Title: Two-component injection moulding of thermoset elastomer and rigid thermoplastic
Abstract: This project is a collaboration between the University of Malta and Trelleborg Sealing&#xD;
Solutions Malta. The main aim of this project is to investigate the process parameters&#xD;
which should be optimised to produce rubber to plastic products (a subset of two&#xD;
component technology) with the best possible bond strength between the rigid&#xD;
thermoplastic component and the thermoset elastomer component of the final product.&#xD;
Two-component injection moulding of thermoset elastomer (rubber) and thermoplastic&#xD;
is a new technology that enables the production of components made from those two&#xD;
material types without the use of conventional moulding processes such as over&#xD;
moulding) or post-processes (assembly). However, the moulding material combinations&#xD;
proposed by TSS involve balancing competing temperature processes with the high-performance&#xD;
thermoplastic component being injected from a hot barrel to a cold mould&#xD;
and the reverse for the high-performance engineering thermoset elastomer component.&#xD;
These two competing requirements in the same mould will affect the process itself,&#xD;
making it a rather delicate and unpredictable process without adequate analysis.&#xD;
The project commenced with the proper research and selection of software- based tools&#xD;
that would be used to conduct an in-depth analysis to support the optimisation of the&#xD;
production process. Once the tools were selected, specific equipment and material&#xD;
knowledge was expanded upon within TSS facilities and production, validation testing,&#xD;
materials testing, characterization analyses and finally the optimized process parameters&#xD;
were obtained and shared with TSS in the form of this report.
Description: B.ENG (HONS)</description>
    <dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74733">
    <title>Sustainability assessment of recyclable and reusable plastic cosmetic packages</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74733</link>
    <description>Title: Sustainability assessment of recyclable and reusable plastic cosmetic packages
Abstract: The importance of sustainability has become increasingly relevant in past years, with&#xD;
the government, businesses, and the general public alike striving to improve their&#xD;
environmental footprint in various aspects of their life. This sense of sustainable urgency&#xD;
also applies to the cosmetic industry, which contributes significantly to the global plastic&#xD;
manufactured and used worldwide.&#xD;
The main tool used to assess the proposed methodology was the life cycle analysis&#xD;
(LCA). The primary goal of this study was to analyse the total life cycle environmental&#xD;
impact of a reusable cosmetic product and a recyclable cosmetic product. This was done&#xD;
by creating several different versions of the existing cosmetic product being analysed,&#xD;
with each version housing a specific attribute change. Some examples of the attribute&#xD;
alterations include applying different rates of dematerialisation, adding recycling&#xD;
potential, and altering the product’s design to study the effect that this has on&#xD;
sustainability. In total seven versions were proposed, including the original existing&#xD;
version which was treated as the benchmark. Results showed that the most&#xD;
environmentally friendly version proved to be the design which eliminated the use of&#xD;
the pan altogether, thus allowing the cosmetic powder to be inserted directly into the&#xD;
case itself. However, this was deemed as not being entirely realistic, since the pan&#xD;
component design cannot be altered easily. Thus, the most environmental version&#xD;
resulted in being the version which is both reusable and recyclable.&#xD;
In addition to this, the variation of the environmental footprint with regards to all phases&#xD;
of the plastic cosmetic product’s life cycle, i.e. raw material extraction, manufacturing,&#xD;
transportation, use, and end of life, were also analysed. It was found that throughout all&#xD;
the seven versions, the biggest contributor by far was contributed to the raw material&#xD;
extraction and manufacturing stages. Furthermore, the effect of how altering different&#xD;
parameters such as the manufacturing location, and end of life location were studied.&#xD;
Results showed that manufacturing in Malta proved to be 13% more environmentally&#xD;
friendly than manufacturing in China, and that using and disposing of this product in&#xD;
Europe proved to be on average 44% more environmentally friendly then the proposed&#xD;
alternative in the United States of America. Finally, the cost aspect of sustainability was&#xD;
also discussed by using the life cycle costing tool. In summary, this exercise found that&#xD;
the highest part contributor to the case assembly was the mirror, and that manufacturing&#xD;
in China proved to be cheaper overall than manufacturing in Malta.
Description: B.ENG (HONS)</description>
    <dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74533">
    <title>Design of a 3D printed industrial robotic manipulator</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74533</link>
    <description>Title: Design of a 3D printed industrial robotic manipulator
Abstract: Industrial robotic manipulators are a whole family of industrial machinery whose&#xD;
purpose is to, accurately and precisely, position and orient tools called end-effectors&#xD;
from one location to another. These so-called end-effectors come in the form of grippers,&#xD;
welding torches, power tools and countless other devices that are designed to&#xD;
accomplish specific industrial operations. This project explores the possibility of&#xD;
designing an original industrial robotic manipulator and subsequently transforming the&#xD;
design into an operational prototype through the application of 3D printing technologies.&#xD;
The finished product was to replicate the performance observed in a real-life&#xD;
manipulator as accurately as possible, with all limitations considered.&#xD;
The methodology adopted was based on ‘The Basic Design Cycle’ of engineering design&#xD;
theory. During the problem analysis stage, the quantifiable, physical, safety and&#xD;
technological requirements were drawn up in a Product Design Specifications (PDS)&#xD;
chart. Once these requirements were formulated, the design process was branched into&#xD;
two sections, so that the solution could be developed in stages. In preparation of the&#xD;
design processes, the torques required at each joint were estimated through a static&#xD;
model analysis, which was based on the quantifiable requirements set in the PDS. The&#xD;
results obtained could then be used as a general guideline throughout the following&#xD;
design process sections.&#xD;
The first section involved the design, prototyping and optimization of the first joint&#xD;
prototype, which determined the fundamental elements of the entire robotic&#xD;
manipulator. The second section featured the incorporation of the optimized robotic&#xD;
joint design into the whole scheme of the project. Having defined the main elements in&#xD;
the first section, the second stage focussed more on the selection of concepts,&#xD;
configurations, and actuators. The assembly as well as the control system of the whole&#xD;
industrial robotic manipulator were designed based on the decisions made.&#xD;
Finally, once the complete prototype was produced and assembled, evaluation and&#xD;
testing were carried out as to define its performance. Strengths, limitations and possible&#xD;
improvements of both design and physical prototype were also specified.
Description: B.ENG (HONS)</description>
    <dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

