<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/8371">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/8371</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147434" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146467" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146261" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145536" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-06-19T10:29:47Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147434">
    <title>Introduction : deconstruction and twenty-first century thought, part 1 : the new realisms</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147434</link>
    <description>Title: Introduction : deconstruction and twenty-first century thought, part 1 : the new realisms
Authors: Lynes, Philippe; Young, Niki
Abstract: In his 2018 article ‘État present: Post-Deconstructive Thought&#xD;
and Criticism’, Ian James identified four thinkers whose reception&#xD;
had produced what he called a ‘post-deconstructive naturalism’&#xD;
in contemporary scholarship–François Laruelle, Jean-Luc Nancy,&#xD;
Catherine Malabou, and Bernard Stiegler–each of whom had ‘taken&#xD;
up and developed deconstruction in ways which echo Derrida’s thought&#xD;
but which, at the same time, emerge as distinctly un-Derridean’ (James&#xD;
2018, 85). For James, the ontological, materialist, and realist concerns&#xD;
shared by these four had served to further open the humanities&#xD;
onto engagements with the natural sciences. Questions of physical&#xD;
materiality, energy, organic life, ecology, and artificial intelligence now&#xD;
dominate scholarship in animal studies, ecocriticism, new materialism,&#xD;
posthumanism, and speculative realism. Since 2018, however, three of&#xD;
these thinkers have passed away: Stiegler in 2020, Nancy in 2021,&#xD;
and Laruelle in 2024.  [extract]</description>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146467">
    <title>Bodies in motion</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146467</link>
    <description>Title: Bodies in motion
Abstract: What might it mean to be a body, or to feel at home in one’s own body? One might &#xD;
begin by drawing a border or limit between oneself and another, or by tracing a &#xD;
perimeter that would, at once, demarcate the manner in which a given body would &#xD;
take up space. Might not the act of drawing a border permit the possibility of its own &#xD;
undoing? Through movement, a body undoes itself as soon as it is asked to be held in &#xD;
place. [excerpt]</description>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146261">
    <title>Passionate encounters : Alphonso Lingis on community, alterity, and politics</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146261</link>
    <description>Title: Passionate encounters : Alphonso Lingis on community, alterity, and politics
Authors: Young, Niki
Abstract: This article explores the underexamined political dimensions of Alphonso Lingis’ &#xD;
philosophy, with a focus on his understanding of community, alterity, and passion &#xD;
as a possibility for political action. I show how Lingis’ work departs from liberal &#xD;
individualism in order to emphasize “community” as a condition for political engagement rooted in the ethical imperative evoked by the singularity and suffering of &#xD;
others. I then present a speculative account of Lingisian politics which builds on the &#xD;
possible reasons for his admiration of revolutionary figures such as Gandhi and Ché &#xD;
Guevara as exemplars of a passionate, compassionate, and dynamic political praxis.</description>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145536">
    <title>Pathologies of passion</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145536</link>
    <description>Title: Pathologies of passion
Authors: Young, Niki
Abstract: In this paper, I aim to clarify and expand Alphonso Lingis’ understanding of impassioned states by&#xD;
showing how society pathologises passion through the language of emotions, there by obscuring the excesses that&#xD;
are constitutive of life. I proceed by first analysing how modernity reconfigures disruptive passions into&#xD;
manageable emotional states that sustain regularity, utility, and calculative models of the self. Second, I elaborate&#xD;
six interrelated properties of passion while systematically contrasting the latter with culturally coded emotions.&#xD;
Finally, I briefly examine how literature, theatre, cinema, and media narratives disclose the contingent, irrational&#xD;
forces that shape individual lives. I conclude that pathologising passion is not a neutral diagnostic gesture but a&#xD;
deeply philosophical operation that props up a shallow, needs-based conception of agency, and I argue instead for&#xD;
a philosophical practice that attends to impassioned ruptures and shared festive intensities as indispensable&#xD;
revelations of the real forces that contour both individual and collective existence.</description>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

