<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/8442">
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/8442</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/8623" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/8622" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-11T14:21:04Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/8623">
    <title>The association between baseline characteristics and the outcome of foot ulceration in a Maltese population with diabetes</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/8623</link>
    <description>Title: The association between baseline characteristics and the outcome of foot ulceration in a Maltese population with diabetes
Abstract: AIM:&#xD;
To determine patient and ulcer characteristics which predict wound healing in patients living&#xD;
with diabetes.&#xD;
METHODS:&#xD;
A prospective observational study was conducted on 100 subjects presenting with a diabetic&#xD;
foot ulceration. Patient and ulcer characteristics were recorded. Patients were followed up to&#xD;
a maximum of 1 year.&#xD;
RESULTS:&#xD;
After 1 year of follow-up, ulcer characteristics were more predictive of ulcer healing than&#xD;
patient characteristics. Seventy-seven per cent of ulcers healed and 23% had not healed.&#xD;
Independent predictors of non-healing were ulcer stage (p=0.003), presence of biofilm&#xD;
(p=0.020), presence of infection (p=0.022) and ulcer depth (p=0.028) in the study group.&#xD;
Although this study demonstrated that the baseline HBA1c reading at the start of the study&#xD;
was not a significant predictor of foot ulcer outcome [p=0.603, resolved vs. amputated],&#xD;
however upon further statistical analyses, when HbA1c was compared to the time taken for&#xD;
complete ulcer healing [n=77], it proved to be significant [p=0.009].&#xD;
CONCLUSION:&#xD;
The factors influencing healing are ulcer stage, presence of biofilm and ulcer depth. These&#xD;
findings have important implications for clinical practice especially in an out-patient setting.&#xD;
Prediction of outcome may be helpful for healthcare professionals in individualizing and&#xD;
optimizing clinical assessment and management of patients. Identification of determinants of&#xD;
outcome could result in improved health outcomes, improved quality of life and lesser&#xD;
diabetes related foot complications.
Description: M.SC.PODIATRY</description>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/8622">
    <title>An investigation of the relationship between a static diagnosis of ankle equinus and dynamic function of the ankle joint</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/8622</link>
    <description>Title: An investigation of the relationship between a static diagnosis of ankle equinus and dynamic function of the ankle joint
Abstract: is characterised by a limited ankle joint range of motion which is usually caused by&#xD;
the contracture of the triceps surea muscle group. There are numerous definitions and&#xD;
techniques to diagnose ankle equinus. A commonly used examination utilised in a clinical&#xD;
setting is as described by Root et al., (1977) where passive ankle joint dorsiflexion is&#xD;
examined using a hand held goniometer. Several studies have proven this to be unreliable.&#xD;
Unfortunately literature has failed to correlate static examinations of the ankle joint with its&#xD;
dynamic motion.&#xD;
Aim: The aim of this research was to investigate whether there is a relationship between the&#xD;
static diagnosis of ankle equinus and the dynamic motion of the ankle joint.&#xD;
Research Design and Method: A quantitative non-experimental same subject research&#xD;
design was employed in this study. Twenty participants with a mean age of 34 years were&#xD;
divided into two equal groups which were of normal (0 to +5) or pronated (+6 to +10)&#xD;
foot type, using the foot posture index. The static examination was then carried out using a&#xD;
fixed goniometer, following which they were divided into two categories of ‘between&#xD;
-5 to 0 degrees’ or ‘less than -5 degrees’ of ankle equinus. Dynamic examination was&#xD;
then carried out using a 3D optoelectronic capture system where markers were placed&#xD;
according to the Rizzoli foot model. An average of the maximum dynamic ankle joint and&#xD;
foot dorsiflexion was taken.&#xD;
Results: No relationship was found between static examination findings and dynamic motion&#xD;
of ankle joint dorsiflexion. 66.7% of participants in the ‘between -5 to 0 degrees’ category&#xD;
had more than 10 degrees of ankle joint motion during gait. On the other hand in the 'less&#xD;
than -5 degrees' of static ankle equinus, all of the individuals had less than 10 degrees of&#xD;
dynamic ankle joint dorsiflexion but there was still an increase of average dynamic&#xD;
motion. Similar results were obtained in the dynamic foot dorsiflexion, where a marginal&#xD;
increase in dynamic ankle joint dorsiflexion was observed which was attributed to the&#xD;
midtarsal joint dorsiflexion. Also, a significant relationship between gender and dynamic&#xD;
ankle and foot motion was noted, as the female population had a higher degree of ankle joint&#xD;
range of motion than males.&#xD;
Conclusion: There was no significant correlation between the static diagnosis of ankle&#xD;
equinus and the dynamic motion of the ankle joint in the category of 'between -5 to 0&#xD;
degrees'. This indicates that the technique as explained by Root theory is not enough to&#xD;
classify an individual as having ankle equinus. This implies that clinicians should carry&#xD;
out a dynamic examination to confirm diagnosis of ankle equinus. However, in the&#xD;
category of 'less than -5 degrees' of ankle equinus, the participants had less than 10 degrees&#xD;
of ankle joint dorsiflexion. Therefore, although there is no correlation between the two,&#xD;
dynamic ankle equinus was still present. This may also suggest that a standard definition&#xD;
of ankle equinus may be that of having less than -5 degrees of static ankle equinus.
Description: B.SC.(HONS)PODIATRY</description>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

