<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Community:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/1037</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 02:03:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-09-29T02:03:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Translating identities : cultural and linguistic mediation within the Colombian community in Malta</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149390</link>
      <description>Title: Translating identities : cultural and linguistic mediation within the Colombian community in Malta
Abstract: The present study analyses the experience of Colombian migrants in Malta in regards communication &#xD;
in a multilingual environment determined by Spanish, English and Maltese. Rather than approaching &#xD;
communication as a purely linguistic process, the present research understands it as a social and &#xD;
cultural practice through which identity is expressed, negotiated and how this study proves it, &#xD;
transformed. The central argument is that what Colombian migrants do in their everyday interactions &#xD;
goes beyond language learning and/or cultural adaptation; it is a form of cultural translation, in which &#xD;
meaning is continuously mediated across languages and social/cultural settings. &#xD;
The study emphasises in a combination of theoretical frameworks, including Hofstede's cultural &#xD;
dimensions, Hall's high- and low-context communication theory, Li Wei's concept of translanguaging, &#xD;
Communication Accommodation Theory and the concept of linguistic and cultural mediation &#xD;
developed by Carreras i Goicoechea and Pérez Vázquez. All theories together enable research that &#xD;
analyses how cultural values also influence communication and the dynamic, social nature of everyday &#xD;
language use in a migration environment. &#xD;
A qualitative approach was also implemented, combining a semi-structured online survey completed &#xD;
by 30 Colombians residing in Malta and a focus group discussion with three participants. The findings &#xD;
of this study demonstrate that language use is based on contextual situations, with Spanish &#xD;
representing language as an identity mediator for Colombians, English as the main tool for &#xD;
professional and intercultural relationships, and Maltese entering participants' vocabulary gradually &#xD;
through social exposure. Also, as demonstrated in the data collection phase, code-switching is a central &#xD;
feature of Colombians' everyday communicative practices, determined by group dynamics as well as &#xD;
social motivations. Moreover, communication challenges can be both cultural and linguistic wise, &#xD;
depending on individual reasons, and participants are actively mediating in their own interactions &#xD;
through a variety of strategies explained through the research. Most significantly in this study, it was &#xD;
found that the influence of Maltese goes beyond English, but also impacts Spanish’s participants, &#xD;
calling for a process that affects the whole communicative repertoire of a person rather than a single &#xD;
language. &#xD;
Furthermore, this study contributes to translation studies by demonstrating that cultural translation is &#xD;
present in everyday life, not only in professional or literary contexts as it was traditionally believed, &#xD;
and that the Colombian community in Malta represents a rich and underexplored case to understand &#xD;
how language, identity, culture and meaning are understood in a multilingual migration setting like &#xD;
Malta.
Description: M.Trans.(Melit.)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149390</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Marino Faliero di Casimir Delavigne : ricezione, ideologia e strategie traduttive nella prima metà dell’ottocento</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149199</link>
      <description>Title: Marino Faliero di Casimir Delavigne : ricezione, ideologia e strategie traduttive nella prima metà dell’ottocento
Authors: Portelli, Sergio
Abstract: Questo saggio analizza la ricezione e la traduzione in Italia della tragedia Marino Faliero (1829) di Casimir Delavigne durante la prima metà dell'Ottocento. Il contributo esamina nel dettaglio le strategie traduttive, le inclinazioni ideologiche e le scelte stilistiche adottate dai tre traduttori italiani dell'opera: Luigi Raspi (1829), Gaetano Buttafuoco (1838) e Alfonso Porro Schiaffinati (1855). Attraverso l'analisi comparativa delle versioni in prosa e in versi, il testo evidenzia come ciascun traduttore abbia rielaborato l'originale francese in funzione dei propri obiettivi individuali, dei condizionamenti della censura dell'epoca e dell'inserimento dell'opera nel polisistema letterario e teatrale italiano dell'Ottocento.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149199</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is machine translation reliable in the legal field? A corpus-based critical comparative analysis for teaching ESP at tertiary level</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148657</link>
      <description>Title: Is machine translation reliable in the legal field? A corpus-based critical comparative analysis for teaching ESP at tertiary level
Authors: Giampieri, Patrizia
Abstract: This paper is aimed at exploring whether and how machine translation (MT) can be&#xD;
relied on in the legal field. To this aim, clauses excerpted from a distribution&#xD;
agreement are translated from Italian into English by using the Deepl machine&#xD;
translation platform. In order to assess the reliability and quality of the translation,&#xD;
a corpus of distribution agreements written in English as a first language and as a&#xD;
lingua franca is composed. The contracts are sourced from the Onecle.com platform,&#xD;
and the reference corpus is built semi-automatically by using the BootCaT software&#xD;
solution. In order to retrieve documents drafted in international English and hence&#xD;
validated by international lawyers or businesspeople, advanced search techniques&#xD;
are applied. The corpus is then consulted by using the AntConc offline concordancer,&#xD;
and the MT is compared with corpus evidence. The paper findings highlight&#xD;
shortcomings in the MT related to legal formulae. Word order is sometimes&#xD;
incorrect and the system specificity of the legal language in the target text remains&#xD;
unaddressed. The paper calls for future improvements in MT software, and reports&#xD;
the need for translators and translation students to be acquainted with legal&#xD;
language style and writing conventions.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148657</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Translation product evaluation in translator training : a comparison between L1 (English &gt; Dutch) and L2 (Dutch &gt; English) student translations using the PIE method (preselected items evaluation) and the ATA (American translators association) framework for standardized error marking</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148579</link>
      <description>Title: Translation product evaluation in translator training : a comparison between L1 (English &gt; Dutch) and L2 (Dutch &gt; English) student translations using the PIE method (preselected items evaluation) and the ATA (American translators association) framework for standardized error marking
Abstract: Translation evaluation is a contentious area of study, particularly due to the degree of&#xD;
subjectivity of many evaluation methods, yet it is essential in translator training. Likewise,&#xD;
directionality is a controversial field due to the hegemony of translation into the first language&#xD;
(L1 translation). Nevertheless, translation into the foreign language (L2 translation) is included&#xD;
in most, if not all, translator training programmes in many countries.; The present study combines these two much debated fields of study into an empirical&#xD;
experiment conducted in translator training in Flanders. Its aim is twofold. Firstly, it provides&#xD;
insight into the differences between L1 and L2 translation in terms of scores and error types&#xD;
on the basis of the data for this study and a prior pilot study. It also compares the perceived&#xD;
difficulty of both translation directions with the scores achieved. From a process-oriented&#xD;
perspective, this study compares the time spent on the translations with the final scores. The&#xD;
second aim of the study is to scrutinise the evaluation process and empirically test a combined&#xD;
analytical evaluation method consisting of an enhanced version of PIE (Preselected Items&#xD;
Evaluation), an item-based analytical evaluation method, and the ATA (American Translators&#xD;
Association) Framework for Standardized Error Marking.; The findings reveal that, while the scores in both translation directions are low and&#xD;
comparable, surprisingly, the students made slightly more errors in L1 translation, despite&#xD;
perceiving the L2 translation as more difficult. In both translation directions, the main errors&#xD;
identified are terminology errors. In addition, both L1 and L2 translation are characterised by&#xD;
source language interference. It was not possible to establish a conclusive relation between&#xD;
the time spent on the translations and the final scores. As for the evaluation process, the&#xD;
present study reveals several limitations of PIE and the combined PIE and ATA method, and&#xD;
calls for further research into the application of these evaluation methods, particularly into the&#xD;
intersubjective consensus.; It is hoped that this study will inspire L1 and L2 translation lecturers in translator training to&#xD;
consider the evaluation methods they use carefully and refine the L2 translation curriculum&#xD;
based on solid evaluations and contrastive empirical research.
Description: Ph.D.(KU Leuven)</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148579</guid>
      <dc:date>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

