<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/105632</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:08:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-09T06:08:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The EU global gateway as a reaction towards China's belt and road initiative</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/111105</link>
      <description>Title: The EU global gateway as a reaction towards China's belt and road initiative
Abstract: The unveiling of the European Union Global Gateway was met with the outright assumption &#xD;
that it is a reactive endeavour towards China’s Belt and Road Initiative. This theory was the &#xD;
main inspiration for this research; thus, this study aims to deduce whether the EUGG can be &#xD;
considered a response to China’s Belt and Road Initiative. This research provides further &#xD;
understanding of the Global Gateway by explaining and evaluating its components. Moreover, &#xD;
the background and broader context, together with the political, economic and legal factors at &#xD;
play, are described. In addition, the study touches upon the inspiration and the process behind &#xD;
the Global Gateway to garner understanding and assess the implications that the Belt and Road &#xD;
initiative may have had. This research draws a comparison between the 2016 European Union &#xD;
Global Strategy and the Global Gateway, based on the concepts introduced by the former. &#xD;
Beyond shedding light on the correlation of the mentioned concepts and the Global Gateway, &#xD;
this study also provides a prediction of the concepts’ purpose whilst also drawing further &#xD;
understanding of the application of the Global Gateway. This study utilises a grounded theory &#xD;
strategy with a primarily inductive approach based mostly on qualitative data. In addition, a &#xD;
review of the pertinent available literature and primary sources formed an essential part of the &#xD;
research process. The European Union Global Gateway, the Belt and Road Initiative, and the &#xD;
European Union Global Strategy were thoroughly examined using qualitative and secondary &#xD;
quantitative data. The Global Gateway can be interpreted as a culminating moment in a &#xD;
transformative process which builds upon various connectivity strategies and other policies, &#xD;
particularly the 2016 European Union Global Strategy. Thus, the Global Gateway is a global &#xD;
policy, a platform encapsulating strategic policies under one domain with targeted intent, thus &#xD;
with high potential. The influence that can be accorded towards the role of the Belt and Road &#xD;
initiative vis-à-vis the Global Gateway can be deduced as an ingredient rather than the focal &#xD;
point. However, it is an indispensable element of the context and background that led to the &#xD;
Global Gateway. An all-important correlation drawn out by this research is the 2016 European &#xD;
Union Global Strategy elements at play in the Global Gateway. These concepts provide a  &#xD;
prediction of an ambitious Global Gateway which may transform the conventional manner of &#xD;
the European Union’s approach toward elements of external action. They provide a further &#xD;
understanding of the operation of the Global Gateway, which may see a more pragmatic &#xD;
approach and a renewed front of political momentum and charge by member states and several &#xD;
actors in a ‘Team Europe’ approach. Finally, whilst elements of pragmatism in this new &#xD;
conventional approach can be deduced, the fundamental principles and values of the European &#xD;
Union remain a sine qua non.
Description: M.A.(Melit.)</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/111105</guid>
      <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Syrian refugee crisis and consequences of EU financial aid to Turkey</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/110898</link>
      <description>Title: The Syrian refugee crisis and consequences of EU financial aid to Turkey
Abstract: The EU-Turkey relationship is one of the most interesting and complex relationships the EU has &#xD;
with a non-EU member. The differences in religion, culture and overall lifestyle creates a &#xD;
fascinating dynamic. However, it has been prone to several tense moments in its history. Yet, it &#xD;
was due to this unique relationship that led to the topic of this dissertation.&#xD;
Within this dissertation the effects of the Syrian refugee crisis of 2015 on the overall bilateral &#xD;
relations between Turkey and the EU will be analyzed. Special focus will be given to the financial &#xD;
aspect which has become such a high-profile issue area in the last couple of years. &#xD;
These changes and developments in bilateral relations were undertaken by means of several case &#xD;
studies that span the years from 2010 up to the current date. From the analysis of these studies, it &#xD;
became clear that the major effect of the Syrian refugee crisis on these bilateral relations is that &#xD;
for the dependency on its economic soft power might lead the EU into critical condition in the &#xD;
future. This work shows that the socio-political crisis that the refugee flows caused in Europe have &#xD;
led the negotiations between Turkey and the EU to be in favor of the former; which has never &#xD;
happened before. The lack of military organization and a shared asylum policy will lead the EU&#xD;
to become increasingly internally divided and an easier target to other foreign powers if no unified &#xD;
EU action is taken in the near future.
Description: M.A.(Melit.)</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/110898</guid>
      <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The decline of anti-establishment parties in Greece, Italy and Spain</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/110897</link>
      <description>Title: The decline of anti-establishment parties in Greece, Italy and Spain
Abstract: After a stunning wave of gaining swathes of seats and percentages in national general and &#xD;
legislative elections and European elections, anti-establishment parties around Europe, one &#xD;
after another began to drop that support in a similar length of time that they gained it. From &#xD;
knocking on the doors of power and holding the key to the formation of governments in &#xD;
numerous European countries, these parties suddenly began to lose that kind of influence.&#xD;
This research zooms in on the cases of three southern EU member states and four anti-establishment parties within those countries – the Five Star Movement (Italy), Podemos &#xD;
(Spain), Syriza and Golden Dawn (both Greece). This research pieces together empirical &#xD;
observations and the common patterns with the literature of party support, public opinion and &#xD;
leadership to answer the question of what explains this decline for anti-establishment parties &#xD;
in these countries.&#xD;
In line with the bottom-up approach, this research combines the empirical observations in &#xD;
Greece, Italy and Spain with the theories relating to party support, public opinion and &#xD;
leadership to enable the presentation of two hypotheses – one arguing that political parties now &#xD;
come second behind the image of individual politicians (H1), and the other that anti-establishment parties lose support when their message no longer matches the public opinion &#xD;
concerns (H2).&#xD;
Through two detailed case studies examining the operations of the Five Star Movement and &#xD;
Golden Dawn, as well as two further case studies on public opinion in Greece and Italy, H1 is &#xD;
supported whereas H2 is disproven. The research question is, therefore, able to be answered by &#xD;
the phenomenon of politicians before political parties.
Description: M.A.(Melit.)</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/110897</guid>
      <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The euro crisis and shifts in popular euroscepticism in Southern EU member states</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/110896</link>
      <description>Title: The euro crisis and shifts in popular euroscepticism in Southern EU member states
Abstract: The aim of this dissertation is to investigate and examine the existence of Popular &#xD;
Euroscepticism within the Southern EU Member States. This peripheral region of the EU &#xD;
was selected since the European Sovereign Debt Crisis manifested as an asymmetric shock &#xD;
for the EU, whereby the Southern EU MS endured more detrimental consequences to their &#xD;
economies. This presents an interesting case study whereby one can observe the fluctuating &#xD;
levels of Popular Euroscepticism in these states, and then compare the data with the timeline &#xD;
of economic growth of the same states, thus establishing a more nuanced understanding of &#xD;
the impact that periods of austerity have on the citizens’ perception of the EU. Further &#xD;
research is done to provide context to the case studies, since there are underlying variables &#xD;
that may have affected the results other than the independent (Euro Crisis) and dependent &#xD;
(Austerity) variables. The case studies will be inspected throughout the period 2006 to 2019 &#xD;
and will explore the degree to which rising levels of Popular Euroscepticism can be found &#xD;
coinciding with the implementation of EU-imposed austerity measures. &#xD;
A comparative case study using the Most Similar Systems Design (MSSD) method will be &#xD;
used to determine the conclusions for the questions raised above. The case studies were &#xD;
selected for the dissertation based on three variables; they belong to the Southern European &#xD;
geographical region, they were members of the Eurozone by 2008, when the Euro Crisis &#xD;
started, and they experienced negative GDP growth to some degree. This set of criteria &#xD;
produced a total of six case studies: Greece, Italy, Malta, Portugal, Slovenia, and Spain. By &#xD;
comparing the experiences of these case studies in terms of the Euro Crisis (independent &#xD;
variable) and ensuing austerity measures (dependent variable), it was determined that there &#xD;
is indeed a positive correlation between the two. This was proven by exhibiting that levels &#xD;
of Popular Euroscepticism increased in every case study that was obliged to implement &#xD;
austerity measures. In the case of Malta, which was the only Member State at the time to not &#xD;
implement austerity measures (negligible cuts and reforms), there was no recorded increase &#xD;
in the levels of Popular Euroscepticism. &#xD;
In recognition of the need for a more nuanced investigation, it should be noted that this &#xD;
conclusion is merely indicative of a pattern and does not imply that the same rule applies to &#xD;
any other group of case studies in any other period. Other aspects that could have contributed &#xD;
to fluctuating levels of Popular Euroscepticism such as Party-based Euroscepticism, &#xD;
austerity measures imposed by the national governments (rather than imposed by the EU), &#xD;
and the national political climate, are taken into consideration in the individual case studies. &#xD;
This establishes a more well-rounded understanding of the circumstances that may have led &#xD;
to an increase in Popular Euroscepticism.
Description: M.A.(Melit.)</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/110896</guid>
      <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

