<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Community:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/10660</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 12:04:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-09-29T12:04:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hepatic lipidosis in dairy cows</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149399</link>
      <description>Title: Hepatic lipidosis in dairy cows
Abstract: Hepatic lipidosis, which is also recognised as fatty liver syndrome, is one of the most significant &#xD;
metabolic disorders that affects high-production dairy cows during the transition period. This disorder &#xD;
typically starts to develop as the outcome of a negative energy balance that leads to triglyceride &#xD;
buildup in the liver and excessive mobilisation of body fat. This essay is targeted at reviewing the &#xD;
published studies on hepatic lipidosis in dairy cows with a deeper focus on the pathophysiology, risk &#xD;
factors, prevention strategies and diagnostic approaches, while also identifying any gaps that can be &#xD;
found in the current knowledge and any areas that need more research. &#xD;
The employed methodology is a desk study and involves the critical analysis and systematic review &#xD;
of peer-reviewed journal articles, authoritative scientific publications and veterinary textbooks that &#xD;
can be acquired from academic databases like Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Scopus and PubMed. &#xD;
The studies that were collected were thematically analysed and compared in relation to the mechanics &#xD;
of the disease, diagnostic methods, metabolic biomarkers and management practices. &#xD;
This essay has recognised that the main factor that contributes to hepatic lipidosis is a negative energy &#xD;
balance, reduced feed intake, demands for high milk production and excessive body condition scoring &#xD;
all act as major risk factors. Biomarkers in the blood, such as β-hydroxybutyrate and non-esterified &#xD;
fatty acids, are the most commonly used to diagnose, but standardised diagnostic criteria remain &#xD;
insufficient. The publications have indicated consistently that management strategies for prevention, &#xD;
such as maintaining healthy body condition scores and appropriate nutrition for transitioning dairy &#xD;
cows, are more successful than treating the cow after the disease has started. &#xD;
This essay has concluded that hepatic lipidosis is still a substantial challenge in the dairy industry due &#xD;
to its negative effects on productivity, farm profitability and animal health. More in-depth research is &#xD;
required to develop diagnostic tools that are non-invasive and reliable, combine nutritional, &#xD;
management and genetic factors into thorough prevention strategies and create standardised &#xD;
diagnostic thresholds.
Description: Dip. Agric.(Melit.)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149399</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The impacts of animal welfare on milk quality and yield</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149397</link>
      <description>Title: The impacts of animal welfare on milk quality and yield
Abstract: This report explores the relationship between dairy cow welfare, milk yield, milk &#xD;
quality and cow-calf contact systems. Dairy farming has traditionally prioritised &#xD;
productivity, with common practices such as early cow-calf separation being used to &#xD;
maximise saleable milk and improve management efficiency. However, increasing &#xD;
concern for animal welfare has encouraged greater interest in alternative systems &#xD;
that allow cows and calves to maintain physical or partial contact after birth. This &#xD;
report discusses key welfare factors affecting dairy cows, including housing, &#xD;
bedding, nutrition, heat stress, health management, handling and stress. These &#xD;
factors directly influence milk production by affecting feed intake, rumination, &#xD;
immune function, udder health and milk let-down. Poor welfare can contribute to &#xD;
diseases such as mastitis, ketosis, lameness and metritis, all of which may reduce &#xD;
milk yield and alter milk quality. Milk quality is also affected through changes in &#xD;
somatic cell count, bacterial contamination, fat, protein, lactose and overall milk &#xD;
composition. Cow-calf contact systems may improve welfare by allowing natural &#xD;
behaviours such as suckling, grooming, bonding and social learning. However, they &#xD;
also create practical challenges, including reduced saleable milk, the need for &#xD;
adapted housing, hygiene management and careful monitoring of calf and udder &#xD;
health. Overall, this report highlights that animal welfare and productivity should not &#xD;
be viewed as opposing goals. Instead, welfare-conscious dairy systems may support &#xD;
healthier animals, safer milk and more sustainable production when managed &#xD;
appropriately.
Description: Dipl. Agric.(Melit.)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149397</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Effects of vegetation and land management on campus soil organic matter</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149369</link>
      <description>Title: Effects of vegetation and land management on campus soil organic matter
Abstract: Soil organic matter (SOM) is a key indicator of soil quality, influencing nutrient availability, water &#xD;
retention, and overall ecosystem functioning. This study investigated the effects of land &#xD;
management practices and vegetation cover on SOM content in calcareous clay loam soils within &#xD;
the University of Malta campus. Six sites representing different land-use and vegetation treatments &#xD;
were examined: soil under olive trees, Aleppo pine trees, tilled agricultural soil, tilled non&#xD;
agricultural soil, natural vegetation, and a shallow valley site. &#xD;
Soil samples were collected from the upper 20 cm layer and analysed using the Loss on Ignition &#xD;
(LOI) method. Results showed significant differences in SOM among treatments. The highest &#xD;
SOM content was recorded under olive trees (11.98%), followed by Aleppo pines (10.33%), &#xD;
natural vegetation (9.07%), and the shallow valley site (8.22%). Lower SOM levels were observed &#xD;
in tilled non-agricultural soil (6.07%), while the lowest values occurred in tilled agricultural soil &#xD;
(4.96%). Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA confirmed that land use and management &#xD;
practices significantly affected SOM content (P &lt; 0.001). &#xD;
The findings indicate that permanent vegetation cover and minimal soil disturbance promote SOM &#xD;
accumulation through continuous organic inputs and reduced decomposition rates. In contrast, &#xD;
long-term tillage and cultivation accelerate organic matter loss. Although the LOI method may &#xD;
overestimate absolute SOM values in calcareous clay-rich soils, it remains effective for comparing &#xD;
treatments under identical analytical conditions. Overall, the study highlights the importance of &#xD;
vegetation cover and conservation-oriented land management practices in maintaining soil organic &#xD;
matter and improving soil quality in Mediterranean calcareous soils.
Description: Dip. Agric.(Melit.)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149369</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Agricultural marketing centres in  Malta and abroad</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149368</link>
      <description>Title: Agricultural marketing centres in  Malta and abroad
Abstract: The Maltese agricultural marketing centre is known as il-Pitkalija and it holds a near-monopoly &#xD;
on agricultural marketing in Malta and as a system it has its advantages and disadvantages. &#xD;
Farmers in Malta are on the decline and have gradually been relegated to field workers that &#xD;
cannot make ends meet without constant sacrifice.   &#xD;
Agriculture in Malta is considered heavily laborious despite the revolution of modern &#xD;
technology especially in the age of digital solutions that epitomise the informational era. A &#xD;
hierarchy between players in the pitkalija prevails and it risks harming the legitimacy of the &#xD;
Maltese agriculture centre and bring into question fairness and equity of the pitkal auction &#xD;
system.   &#xD;
The oligopoly of pitkala risks short-changing farmers, especially with pressure on the &#xD;
remaining links in the food chain that collectively profit on a distance between farmer and &#xD;
consumer by the process of marketing. Regulating and organising the auction bring the &#xD;
responsibility to make or break the profits, livelihood and potential of the farmers and therefore &#xD;
intermediary players in the food supply chain are in a position of power.   &#xD;
Through this research, a desk-based investigation of whether the pitkalija is ideal for farmers &#xD;
and consumers in Malta is being conducted, proceeding to outline foreign solutions to &#xD;
agricultural marketing with a view to determine whether there are any lessons to be learned to &#xD;
bring local agriculture in line with modern standards and a fair deal for genuine farmers &#xD;
exploring solutions represented by farmer cooperatives, alternative supply chains and digital &#xD;
tools.
Description: Dip. Agric.(Melit.)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/149368</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

