<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/117809</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 03:39:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-27T03:39:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>A comparison of thermal camera technology in diabetic foot complications</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/122440</link>
      <description>Title: A comparison of thermal camera technology in diabetic foot complications
Abstract: Aim:&#xD;
The aim of the study was to compare temperature readings from low-cost thermal cameras to &#xD;
a higher quality thermal camera in order to determine whether these cameras could be safely &#xD;
utilised when obtaining such temperatures in the diabetic foot in a clinical setting.&#xD;
Research Design and Method:&#xD;
This research project was a quantitative, postpositivist and quasi-experimental study which &#xD;
investigated the ability of low-cost thermal cameras to report temperature readings which are &#xD;
comparable to those of a high-cost thermal camera. The higher cost, ‘gold standard’ thermal &#xD;
camera was the FLIR T630, while the two low-cost thermal cameras used were one stand-alone &#xD;
thermal camera, the FLIR C3, and one smartphone-attached thermal camera, the FLIR One &#xD;
Gen 1. A thermal image of each participant was taken with each camera at three different &#xD;
ambient temperatures of 19℃, 23℃ and 28℃, in order to investigate whether the surrounding &#xD;
ambient temperature could affect the ability of those low-cost thermal cameras to report the &#xD;
appropriate temperature readings. From each thermal image, 8 different toe and forefoot &#xD;
regions of interest were manually demarcated using the FLIR ResearchIR programme, which&#xD;
then provided the mean temperature of each region. The mean temperature scores of the                             &#xD;
low-cost thermal cameras were then compared to the mean temperature scores of the FLIR T630 &#xD;
camera through the appropriate statistical analysis. &#xD;
Results:&#xD;
The findings of this study showed that the FLIR C3 camera did not report comparable results &#xD;
to the FLIR T630 (p=&lt;0.05) at 19℃ and 23℃, however, the temperature readings were &#xD;
statistically similar at 28℃. The FLIR One camera on the other hand reported statistically &#xD;
similar readings (p&gt;0.05) in all three room temperatures, which contrasts to what was observed &#xD;
in the FLIR C3. From the FLIR One temperature readings, only the 5th digit readings at 19℃&#xD;
varied significantly from the FLIR T630.&#xD;
Conclusion&#xD;
These findings in the present study indicate that while the FLIR One smartphone thermal &#xD;
camera was able to report similar temperature readings to the FLIR T630, the FLIR C3 was &#xD;
not, even though the FLIR One is a cheaper option than the FLIR C3. A possible explanation &#xD;
for this observation is that although the FLIR C3 has a higher cost, its infrared resolution is &#xD;
lower than that of the FLIR One. This could be due to the fact that since the FLIR C3 is a stand-alone     &#xD;
thermal camera, it requires a lot of computational features and specifications that the &#xD;
FLIR One camera does not need since it uses the features of the smartphone device to which it &#xD;
is attached. This helps keeps the cost of the FLIR One camera very low, and since the only &#xD;
major feature of the FLIR One is the infrared sensor, an improvement in the sensor still allows&#xD;
the cost of the FLIR One to remain low. This study has shown that certain low-cost thermal &#xD;
cameras may be used to report temperature readings correctly, however, it is important that the &#xD;
thermal camera is tested and validated before it is used for detailed temperature reading &#xD;
analysis of the diabetic foot.
Description: M.Sc.(Melit.)</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/122440</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Biomechanical variations in gait of active and sedentary individuals upon perceived exertion</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/119589</link>
      <description>Title: Biomechanical variations in gait of active and sedentary individuals upon perceived exertion
Abstract: Aim: The aim of this research was to investigate whether there are comparable differences in &#xD;
the gait kinematic, kinetic and spatio-temporal parameters which can be observed within the &#xD;
gait of both active and sedentary young adults upon exertion up to the point of maximal &#xD;
fatigue.&#xD;
Method: The current study is a quantitative, correlational, experimental study. The entire &#xD;
research protocol was performed in a clinical gait and motion analysis laboratory in the &#xD;
Podiatry Department, within the Faculty of Health Sciences (University of Malta, Mater Dei &#xD;
Hospital). An 18-camera Vicon Motion Capture System was utilised to collect all gait &#xD;
parameters. Retroreflective markers were placed upon various anatomical locations on the &#xD;
participants’ lower limbs as dictated by the Plugin-Gait model (Vicon). This system provided &#xD;
a digital map of the participants’ walking pattern in space whilst also providing quantifiable &#xD;
data which was then used to measure pattern differences. All participants were asked the &#xD;
same questions and the same readings were taken throughout the entire research process. &#xD;
After the initial motion capture, participants were asked to run/jog on a treadmill at a self-selected,         &#xD;
comfortable pace whilst having their relevant recordings of Rate of Perceived &#xD;
Exertion (RPE), speed, distance, time, peripheral oxygen saturation (SPO2), and Heart Rate &#xD;
(HR) recorded. Once fatigue was achieved (when the participants stated that they scored their &#xD;
fatigue as 20 on the RPE scale), the participants were required to perform one final motion &#xD;
capture with the same instructions as the earlier gait analysis procedure. Subsequently, the &#xD;
six best pre- and post- trials (three for pre- and three for post-) with the most representative &#xD;
gait patterns were selected from each session and used for data processing. In data &#xD;
processing, the captures were tabulated and an average was calculated. This entire process &#xD;
was conducted for all participants and spanned over a period of 6 months.&#xD;
Results: A total of forty healthy participants successfully participated in this study, (Active &#xD;
participants: 31; Sedentary participants: 9; Male Participants: 20; Female Participants: 20; Age &#xD;
average: 26; SD ± 2.05). Significant (p &lt;0.05) fatigue-induced changes in ankle &#xD;
dorsi/plantarflexion and GRFZ occurred in all the five phases of gait (Heel Strike, Mid-Stance, &#xD;
Weight-Transference, Toe-off, and Mid-Swing). This study found that these kinematic and &#xD;
kinetic variations altered various spatio-temporal parameters. These variations were evident &#xD;
in all the participants’ reduction in cadence (p = 0.002), step times (p &lt;0.001) and stride times &#xD;
(p = 0.012). Furthermore, this study observed that fatigue alters gait significantly regardless &#xD;
of whether participants are active or sedentary.&#xD;
Conclusion: Considering the nature of the fatiguing task, subjects experienced maximal &#xD;
exhaustion, but they may not have progressed through to maximal fatigue. Nevertheless, the &#xD;
readings obtained within this study, which could be described as a “fatigued/exhaustive &#xD;
state”, still satisfy the requirements of the aim. Furthermore, this research observed &#xD;
significant effect of fatigue on ankle kinematic and kinetic mechanisms. Ankle &#xD;
dorsi/plantarflexion, GRFZ, along with other (less-significant) biomechanical alterations led to &#xD;
significant reduction in cadence, step times and stride times. It was also discussed how these &#xD;
kinematic and kinetic paradigms have substantial implications for the gait pattern of athletes, &#xD;
the elderly, and the general population. Addressing these may decrease the risk of falls and &#xD;
injuries.
Description: M.Sc.(Melit.)</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/119589</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Evaluating medical thermography for the detection of joint synovitis of hands and feet in people living with rheumatoid arthritis</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/119588</link>
      <description>Title: Evaluating medical thermography for the detection of joint synovitis of hands and feet in people living with rheumatoid arthritis
Abstract: Aim: To determine whether infrared thermography could detect the presence of joint synovitis &#xD;
in the hands and feet of people living with Rheumatoid Arthritis.&#xD;
Methods: A single-centre, quantitative, prospective, non-experimental, observational, &#xD;
comparative study was conducted at the Rheumatology Department in Mater Dei Hospital. The &#xD;
sample (n=26) included 5 participants who had joint synovitis (used as controls) and 21 &#xD;
participants whose status of whether joint synovitis was present or absent was unknown. The &#xD;
consultant rheumatologist conducted the disease activity score (DAS-28) assessment and an &#xD;
ultrasound assessment of the hand and feet whilst, a state registered podiatrist performed the &#xD;
Ritchie Articular Index (RAI) and thermographic imaging assessment of the hands and feet.&#xD;
Results: The study findings highlighted a significant difference between the temperature &#xD;
readings and ultrasound readings (p&lt;0.05) of hands and feet. In all the joints of participants &#xD;
(n=26), the temperature readings taken with the FLIR thermographic camera were higher when &#xD;
joint synovitis was present on ultrasound then the temperature readings when joint synovitis &#xD;
was absent on ultrasound. Additionally, through the regression models the temperature cut-off &#xD;
points between participants living with RA in remission and participants with active synovitis &#xD;
was established for the finger, palm, forefoot and midfoot and heel. Finally, amongst the &#xD;
participants whose RA status was unknown (n=21) the results of the chi-square test (p&gt;0.05) &#xD;
showed no significant difference between the results obtained from the FLIR thermographic &#xD;
camera images and the diagnostic ultrasound demonstrating a perfect agreement in results &#xD;
between both tools as to whether joint synovitis was either present or absent.&#xD;
Conclusion: The study findings conclude that in all the joints of the hands and feet, the &#xD;
temperature readings taken with the FLIR thermographic camera were higher when joint &#xD;
synovitis was present on ultrasound compared to no presence of synovitis. This study has &#xD;
identified the temperature cut-off points of the finger, palm, forefoot and midfoot and heel for &#xD;
individuals with RA in remission and individuals with RA with active synovitis, thus these &#xD;
results have added to the body of knowledge the baseline temperatures of an individual with &#xD;
RA with joint synovitis of the hands and feet. Since readings obtained from the FLIR &#xD;
thermographic camera correlated with the results obtained from diagnostic ultrasound in &#xD;
the detection of joint synovitis in the hands and feet, the authors recommend routine screening &#xD;
in RA patients utilizing infrared thermography as an alternative measure to diagnostic &#xD;
ultrasound for the early detection if any, of joint synovitis to enable early referral and &#xD;
management of this condition . Further studies are warranted to further confirm results of this &#xD;
study.
Description: M.Sc.(Melit.)</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/119588</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A comparison of screening tools for the accurate diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/119585</link>
      <description>Title: A comparison of screening tools for the accurate diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes
Abstract: Aim: To investigate and compare different subjective screening modalities recommended in the &#xD;
diabetic foot screening guidelines for detecting peripheral neuropathy in a primary care setting, &#xD;
and compare their results with the objective tool, the NC-Stat® DPN Check®.&#xD;
Research Design and Methods: A prospective non-experimental quantitative comparative study &#xD;
was conducted in Primary Health Centres. Sixty- three participants (mean age 54.5 years ± 10.5) &#xD;
who met the inclusion criteria and were living with Type 2 diabetes mellitus for at least 10 years &#xD;
were recruited using a convenience sampling method. The subjective tools utilized were the &#xD;
Semmes-Weinstein 10-g monofilament, 128-Hz traditional tuning fork (TTF), neurothesiometer &#xD;
and the O‟Brien 128-Hz electronic tuning fork (ETF). These tools were compared with the &#xD;
objective measure NC-Stat® DPN Check® for the detection of peripheral neuropathy. The NC-Stat                 &#xD;
device was chosen since it has been deemed by research as a reliable tool to detect &#xD;
peripheral neuropathy in its early stages. Each test was carried out bilaterally, therefore a total of &#xD;
126 limbs were statistically analysed.&#xD;
Results: A significant difference was reported between all the screening tools when compared in &#xD;
the same group of participants (P &lt; 0.05). The descending order of limbs classified as having &#xD;
„absent‟ sensation, from highest to lowest percentage is as follows: NC-Stat® DPN Check®&#xD;
(32.5%), ETF constant mode (23.8%), ETF descending mode (23%), TTF (20.6%), &#xD;
neurothesiometer (11.1%) and lastly the 10-g monofilament (4%). Further analysis comparing &#xD;
each subjective tool with the NC-Stat device within their respective categories revealed &#xD;
significant differences between the percentages of limbs with peripheral neuropathy. &#xD;
Conclusion: The findings have shown that some screening modalities are more sensitive to the &#xD;
diagnosis of DPN than others. This highlights the importance of using multiple screening tools to &#xD;
assess diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) to gain a better understanding of the patient‟s &#xD;
neurological status. The findings also suggest the inclusion of objective tools such as the NC-Stat &#xD;
tool in diabetic foot screening assessments, as it may enhance the early detection of peripheral &#xD;
neuropathy. Additionally, considering that the subjective measures utilized in this study were all &#xD;
recommended by diabetic foot screening guidelines, the observed variations among these tools &#xD;
suggest a compelling case for change. With the advancements in technology and our evolving &#xD;
understanding of disease progression, it is suggested that these emerging screening tools may be &#xD;
incorporated into revised guidelines to ensure optimal and evidence-based care. Standardizing &#xD;
diagnostic criteria and identifying early biomarkers for nerve degeneration in DPN are crucial for &#xD;
optimal patient care. Further rigorous studies comparing screening tests with a gold standard tool &#xD;
are necessary to determine the most valid non-invasive screening modality utilized in a primary &#xD;
care setting which would reduce the false negative/positive result.
Description: M.Sc.(Melit.)</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/119585</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

