<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/123475</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 04:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-08T04:06:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Foreword [ELSA Malta Law Review, 5, 2015]</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/123669</link>
      <description>Title: Foreword [ELSA Malta Law Review, 5, 2015]
Abstract: This is the fifth issue of the ELSA Malta Law Review. This publication goes to&#xD;
show the tenacity with which the ELSA Malta Law Review Editorial Board has&#xD;
ensured that this Review continues to be published, not only on a regular and&#xD;
timely basis, but also contains articles of high academic quality whilst touching&#xD;
diverse areas of the law. This is thanks to the hard work put in by successive&#xD;
Editorial Board team members of ELSA Malta Law Review.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/123669</guid>
      <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Editorial [ELSA Malta Law Review, 5, 2015]</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/123668</link>
      <description>Title: Editorial [ELSA Malta Law Review, 5, 2015]
Abstract: The year 2011 saw the birth of the ELSA Malta Law Review, a student-edited and&#xD;
peer-reviewed law journal published by the European Law Students’ Association&#xD;
Malta (ELSA). Throughout the years the law journal has gained increased credibility&#xD;
and the support of many law students, legal practitioners and academics in the legal&#xD;
field and has indeed become a point of reference for legal minds across the&#xD;
European continent. As the fifth Editor-in-Chief of the law journal, it is a great honour to present to you&#xD;
the fifth edition of the Elsa Malta Law Review. This year’s edition features eight&#xD;
contributions: one case comment, one book review and six articles, tackling a&#xD;
number of topics, namely Maritime Law, Civil Law, Criminal Law, Constitutional&#xD;
Law, International Law and International Relations, and Gender Discrimination and&#xD;
Human Rights Law.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/123668</guid>
      <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A discussion of Robert Alexy’s theory of constitutional rules and constitutional principles as a model for adjudication</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/123667</link>
      <description>Title: A discussion of Robert Alexy’s theory of constitutional rules and constitutional principles as a model for adjudication
Authors: Buontempo, Natasha
Abstract: The paper discusses Robert Alexy’s ‘Theory of Constitutional Rights’ with&#xD;
particular reference to his theory of principles and the distinction he draws&#xD;
between constitutional rules and constitutional principles (fundamental human&#xD;
rights). According to Alexy, fundamental human rights as protected by the&#xD;
German Basic Law are principles which have a distinct character from rules,&#xD;
even though both are norms. This distinction necessarily requires the application&#xD;
of the principle of proportionality (Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz) to&#xD;
constitutional cases dealing with the restriction of a constitutional principle&#xD;
(fundamental right) in favour of another. Alexy argues that there is an intimate&#xD;
connection between the principles theory and the application of the principle of&#xD;
proportionality in the adjudication of constitutional rights cases. However, this&#xD;
affirmation has not been free from criticism: both the theory of principles as well&#xD;
as the proportionality principle have been objected to by various scholars&#xD;
refuting any proximate link between the two and claiming that the application of&#xD;
the proportionality principle may lead to irrationality because it does not offer&#xD;
any solid criteria upon which adjudication is to be effectuated. Despite the&#xD;
various objections to the proportionality principle, it is submitted that they fail&#xD;
to overthrow the proportionality principle as an adjudicative technique.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/123667</guid>
      <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The global war on the illicit drug trafficking and organised crime : grabbing the raging bull by the horns, the legs or the tail?</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/123662</link>
      <description>Title: The global war on the illicit drug trafficking and organised crime : grabbing the raging bull by the horns, the legs or the tail?
Authors: Camilleri, George
Abstract: The drug trafficking industry, spearheaded by organised crime, is an ongoing&#xD;
global challenge. Its magnitude and adaptability is acknowledged in various&#xD;
international reports and the existing international instruments are a testament&#xD;
of the situation which indeed merits international concern. The lucrative&#xD;
expectations involved in the trade breeds corruption have also been linked to the&#xD;
financing of international terrorism and arms trafficking.&#xD;
The ongoing ‘war on drugs’ is increasingly being questioned as a result of&#xD;
negative side-effects stemming from the militarisation of law enforcement.&#xD;
Alternative avenues in domestic law and policy need to be considered with the&#xD;
aim to focusing cases drug abuse and drug trafficking separately. Competing with&#xD;
the black market is an option which has been taken up by some jurisdictions&#xD;
which, however, presents potential risks. The challenges faced by source, transit&#xD;
and recipient countries are different and therefore legal policies can vary from&#xD;
one scenario to another.&#xD;
The role of the International Criminal Court should also be considered in cases of&#xD;
transnational drug trafficking operating within areas of absence of law or&#xD;
institutional fragility, particularly in settings of armed conflict and post-conflict.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/123662</guid>
      <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

