<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/136262</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 11:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-17T11:30:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ethical self-understanding as a dimension of personal autonomy</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/136266</link>
      <description>Title: Ethical self-understanding as a dimension of personal autonomy
Authors: Pisani, Keith
Abstract: Over the course of his career, Jürgen Habermas has developed several conceptions&#xD;
of autonomy, most notably moral, private, and public autonomy.. Despite this&#xD;
interest, he has never engaged methodically with the idea of personal autonomy.&#xD;
Notwithstanding this absence, his work contains some ideas that are suggestive&#xD;
of the idea of personal autonomy and that can be developed into a coherent and&#xD;
comprehensive theory. As I state below, his underdeveloped idea of a conscious&#xD;
conduct of life (bewuβte Lebensführung) approximates significantly contemporary&#xD;
conceptions of personal autonomy. A close reading of his work suggests that the&#xD;
idea of a consciously lived life is composed of three interrelated ideas: ethical&#xD;
self-understanding, strong evaluation, and the recognition of participants in&#xD;
communication as competent communicative agents who are expected to speak&#xD;
for themselves. The idea of a conscious conduct of life can be developed into a&#xD;
multidimensional theory of personal autonomy, with each of the three constitutive&#xD;
ideas developed into specific dimensions.; In this article, I will develop Habermas’s idea of ethical self-understanding,&#xD;
understood as a dimension of a Habermas-inspired theory of personal autonomy&#xD;
as a conscious conduct of life. I will start by first situating the idea of a conscious&#xD;
conduct of life within Habermas’s framework of practical reason and briefly explain&#xD;
the above-proposed three dimensions of a conscious conduct of life. Following this,&#xD;
I will then explain what Habermas understands by ethical self-understanding, and by&#xD;
drawing from the work of Hans-Georg Gadamer, whom Habermas cites in one of his&#xD;
brief explications of ethical self-understanding, I will then develop the idea of ethical&#xD;
self-understanding in more detail. Finally, by drawing from the work of Rahel Jaeggi,&#xD;
I will develop two conceptions of two defective modes of ethical self-understanding&#xD;
that tend to close off the possibility of leading a conscious conduct of life.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/136266</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Examining the cognitive demands in biology and physics practical advanced level examinations in Malta</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/136265</link>
      <description>Title: Examining the cognitive demands in biology and physics practical advanced level examinations in Malta
Authors: Azzopardi, Marthese; Camilleri, Liberato
Abstract: Cognitive learning is shown as a six-level hierarchy by Bloom’s Taxonomy, where&#xD;
each level up demands more mental processing. Although educators have been&#xD;
using it since 1956, Anderson and Krathwohl improved it in 2001. This research is&#xD;
based on Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy, which consists of three lower-order cognitive&#xD;
skills (LOCS): remembering, understanding, and applying, and three higher-order&#xD;
cognitive skills (HOCS) - analysing, evaluating, and creating. The aim of this study&#xD;
is to investigate the cognitive profile of the Advanced Matriculation practical&#xD;
examination papers in Biology and Physics, local high-stakes examinations that&#xD;
determine whether students meet the entry requirements for the University of&#xD;
Malta. Data was gathered over a 20-year period from 72 papers and the cognitive&#xD;
objective level of 394 Biology and 467 Physics questions was determined based&#xD;
on Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. According to the results, Biology had a higher mean&#xD;
percentage of HOCS questions (70.7%) than Physics (10.5%), which indicates that&#xD;
Biology is a more cognitively demanding subject. There was a positive correlation&#xD;
between the percentage of HOCS and marks, indicating that the more cognitively&#xD;
demanding the subject is, the higher the marks rewarded to the HOCS category. The&#xD;
number of cognitive objectives differed between Biology and Physics. The Biology&#xD;
examination covered all six levels of the cognitive objectives however the creating&#xD;
objective was lacking in Physics. This research suggests that careful design of the&#xD;
Physics examination questions utilising various quantifiable verbs might be more&#xD;
helpful in supporting the development of higher-level cognitive skills in formal&#xD;
examinations.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/136265</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI in education : challenges and opportunities</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/136264</link>
      <description>Title: AI in education : challenges and opportunities
Authors: Xerri, Daniel
Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming education, offering both opportunities&#xD;
and challenges. This commentary explores AI’s role in personalised learning, the&#xD;
evolving function of teachers, ethical concerns, and the risks of over-reliance. While&#xD;
AI enhances adaptive learning, it struggles with personalisation and pedagogical&#xD;
depth. Teachers remain essential, advocating for AI as a collaborative tool rather&#xD;
than a replacement. Ethical concerns include data privacy, bias, and academic&#xD;
integrity. To address these challenges, educators must promote critical AI literacy and&#xD;
responsible integration, ensuring AI serves as a transformative tool that enhances,&#xD;
rather than replaces, human teaching and learning experiences.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/136264</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

