<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141184</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:51:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-23T23:51:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sanskrit : the philosophy</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141567</link>
      <description>Title: Sanskrit : the philosophy
Authors: Zammit, Michael
Abstract: Life is not merely a biological event. Indeed it may be construed as a&#xD;
linguistic fact especially in the light of a philosophy that, rather than&#xD;
claiming sagacity, assumes to be but a way of life and discourse&#xD;
determined by the eideion, the vision of wisdom. The etymology of the&#xD;
word philosophia itself, i.e. being friends with wisdom, advocates this&#xD;
very project for living philosophy. On the other hand, philosophy is far&#xD;
too often associated with the formation of a critical and independent&#xD;
attitude, with a method of disciplined thought, rigorous and reflective,&#xD;
rooted in wonder, enquiry and indeed astonishment… a rather romantic&#xD;
approach! Certainly such efforts do constitute an arsenal of worthy&#xD;
endeavours, activities surely indispensible to the formation of the good&#xD;
citizen and as such necessary for active participation in the civic life,&#xD;
sporting a free and hopefully autonomous spirit. But, alas, in the final&#xD;
analysis, these are merely the means to an end, tools and instruments.&#xD;
What is the end, then?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141567</guid>
      <dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The role of slaves in Roman land surveying</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141447</link>
      <description>Title: The role of slaves in Roman land surveying
Authors: Takács, Levente
Abstract: The writings of ancient Roman land surveyors were preserved in&#xD;
a collection which is usually referred to as Corpus Agrimensorum&#xD;
Romanorum after the title of the edition published by Thulin at the&#xD;
beginning of the 20th century. Its first manuscript dates back to the 6th&#xD;
century. This collection consists of several writings of different lengths&#xD;
and various contents. Hyginus or Siculus Flaccus, e.g., wrote lengthy&#xD;
discussions; however, the manuscipt also contains short fragments from&#xD;
different laws or geometrical treatises and reports of late Roman officials&#xD;
or clerks. We only have slight pieces of information on the personality&#xD;
or life of the authors, but some of their remarks make us think that they&#xD;
must have had practical or field experience in the background of their&#xD;
theoretical works. The writers of the land surveying treatises did some&#xD;
field work themselves; therefore, it is suprising that they do not mention&#xD;
any mechanical device or labour force in their works.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141447</guid>
      <dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Themistocles as a trickster in Herodotus</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141444</link>
      <description>Title: Themistocles as a trickster in Herodotus
Authors: Juchneviciene, Nijole
Abstract: Herodotus’ Histories is the first extant work documenting the lives of&#xD;
the politicians who took part in historical events. Although Herodotus’&#xD;
historiosophical concept is mainly religious, it draws the attention to the&#xD;
importance of the individual within history; therefore, most of the time it&#xD;
is exactly the individual that determines a certain end of events. The main&#xD;
source of information on wars and, especially, on the Greek politicians&#xD;
who took part in them, for Herodotus, was the oral tradition, which was&#xD;
sometimes authentic, but mostly it had already been perceived as a&#xD;
legend. I am going to show that in his Themistoclean logos Herodotus&#xD;
employs the poetics of oral tradition, and the character of Themistocles&#xD;
in Herodotus bears the traits of an archetypal cultural hero, usually called&#xD;
the trickster. [excerpt]</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141444</guid>
      <dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Drawing distinctions in the Laches : the Elenchus as search</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141443</link>
      <description>Title: Drawing distinctions in the Laches : the Elenchus as search
Authors: Gatt, Jurgen
Abstract: The Socratic Method is a dialectical method, conducted in a questionand-&#xD;
answer format, by which Socrates’ dialectical partner is usually led to&#xD;
a realization of a moral or intellectual failure or both. Such a model of the&#xD;
elenchus emphasizes Socrates’ role as questioner. One recent scholarly&#xD;
trend shifts focus onto the role of the interlocutor in the dialectical&#xD;
partnership. This paper falls within this tradition of scholarship on the&#xD;
Elenchus.; The following is a discussion about the role of ‘drawing distinctions’ in&#xD;
the progress and overall goal of the Elenchus in the Laches. This dialogue is&#xD;
marked by the prominence of the interlocutor’s role in the discussion viz.&#xD;
drawing distinctions to disarm Socrates’ refutations. Such dialectical skill&#xD;
is to be found pre-eminently in Nicias, the pupil of Damon and a frequent&#xD;
associate of Socrates, and Critias, the ‘sophist’. The usual interpretation&#xD;
given to these ‘episodes’ of drawing distinctions is well characterized&#xD;
by Laches’ own reaction to Nicias’ dialectical ‘tricks’ (La. 196a-b). Nicias&#xD;
is ‘shuffling’ in order to avoid a deserving refutation and disguising his&#xD;
ignorance with empty words. This interpretation is naturally implied by&#xD;
an overall negative function of elenchus conceived solely in terms of&#xD;
refutation. [excerpt]</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/141443</guid>
      <dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

