<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Community:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147267</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 22:13:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-06-25T22:13:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Malta Journal of Health Sciences : volume 13 : issue 1</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147508</link>
      <description>Title: Malta Journal of Health Sciences : volume 13 : issue 1
Authors: Spiteri, Georgette; Gatt, Daniela; Lungaro-Mifsud, Stephen; Scerri, Josianne; Couto, Jose Guilherme; Formosa, Melissa Marie; Trapani, Josef; Pavli, Foteini
Abstract: Table of contents:; 1/ Trevor Abela Fiorentino - Editorial - Teaching for confidence; 2/ Jeanette Falzon, Tonio Agius, Anabel Sciriha - Effects of Pilates on Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review; 3/ Randall Debattista, Tonio Agius, &amp; Anabel Sciriha - Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Respiratory Conditions: A Systematic Review; 4/ Victor Martinelli - Academic Emotions in University Students: A Comparative Study; 5/ Gabriella D’Aponte &amp; Claire Copperstone - Stress and Lifestyle Behaviour Changes in Maltese University Students During Exams: A Cross-Sectional Study; 6/ Frank Houghton - Revising Alcohol Consumption Guidelines: Exploring the implications of new initiatives for Canada, Ireland and Malta; 7/ Corinne Scicluna, Maria Cassar, Sharon Martinelli, Daren Chircop, Barbara Anne Nicolls - Electronic Portfolios: Experiences of Pre-Registration Nursing Students at the University of Malta</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147508</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Editorial : teaching for confidence</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147350</link>
      <description>Title: Editorial : teaching for confidence
Authors: Abela Fiorentino, Trevor
Abstract: Healthcare education has made substantial strides&#xD;
in ensuring that students develop into competent&#xD;
professionals. The acquisition of knowledge and technical&#xD;
competence have been long prioritised in healthcare&#xD;
education, with students being rigorously examined on&#xD;
their ability to recall information and perform clinical&#xD;
tasks. As such, healthcare curricula and educational&#xD;
frameworks are intentionally designed to ensure that&#xD;
graduates emerge as knowledgeable and competent&#xD;
practitioners (Monrouxe &amp; Bloomfield, 2023). However,&#xD;
despite the strong emphasis on competence within&#xD;
healthcare education, uncertainty and hesitation remain&#xD;
prevalent among new graduates. Many appear to lack&#xD;
the professional confidence required for independent&#xD;
practice, even after being certified as knowledgeable,&#xD;
skilful, and clinically competent (Alharbi et al., 2023;&#xD;
Carpio et al., 2025; Najafi &amp; Nasiri, 2023). [excerpt]</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147350</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Effects of Pilates on low back pain : a scoping review</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147307</link>
      <description>Title: Effects of Pilates on low back pain : a scoping review
Authors: Falzon, Janette; Agius, Tonio P.; Sciriha, Anabel
Abstract: The purpose of this scoping review was to map and&#xD;
synthesise the existing literature on Pilates-based&#xD;
interventions for low back pain (LBP), with particular&#xD;
attention to reported outcome domains, programme&#xD;
characteristics, and delivery context, and to identify&#xD;
gaps to inform future research and clinical practice.&#xD;
This scoping review was conducted in accordance&#xD;
with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the&#xD;
PRISMA-ScR framework. Searches were performed in&#xD;
August 2025 using Google Scholar and HyDi (including&#xD;
Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PEDro,&#xD;
and Scopus). Eligible studies included randomised&#xD;
controlled trials and systematic reviews or metaanalyses&#xD;
involving adults with non-specific or subacute&#xD;
LBP in which Pilates was the primary intervention.&#xD;
Data were charted on population characteristics,&#xD;
intervention format, dose, supervision, comparator,&#xD;
and reported outcomes across clinical and psychosocial&#xD;
domains. Findings were synthesised narratively. The&#xD;
literature predominantly reports outcomes related to&#xD;
pain intensity, functional disability, and health-related&#xD;
quality of life, with fewer studies assessing psychosocial&#xD;
variables such as kinesiophobia or fear of movement.&#xD;
Pilates interventions varied substantially in delivery format (mat – versus equipment-based), frequency,&#xD;
duration, and level of supervision. Across studies, Pilates&#xD;
was commonly compared with minimal intervention&#xD;
or other exercise approaches, with short-term&#xD;
improvements in patient-reported outcomes frequently&#xD;
described. However, heterogeneity in intervention&#xD;
protocols, outcome measures, follow-up duration, and&#xD;
reporting of instructor qualifications limited cross-study&#xD;
comparability. Reporting of mechanistic outcomes and&#xD;
long-term follow-up was sparse. This scoping review&#xD;
demonstrates that the current literature on Pilates for&#xD;
LBP is characterised by diverse intervention approaches&#xD;
and outcome reporting, with a primary focus on pain&#xD;
and disability outcomes. While Pilates is commonly&#xD;
positioned as a guideline-consistent exercise option,&#xD;
important gaps remain regarding patient selection,&#xD;
instructor expertise, mechanistic pathways, and longterm&#xD;
outcomes. Future research should prioritise&#xD;
standardised reporting of intervention characteristics,&#xD;
broader biopsychosocial outcome assessment, and&#xD;
clearer description of delivery context to support more&#xD;
definitive evaluations.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147307</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in respiratory conditions : a systematic review</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147304</link>
      <description>Title: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in respiratory conditions : a systematic review
Authors: Debattista, Randall; Agius, Tonio P.; Sciriha, Anabel
Abstract: Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) has&#xD;
emerged as a promising adjunctive intervention in the&#xD;
management of respiratory conditions, particularly&#xD;
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, where skeletal&#xD;
muscle dysfunction contributes to reduced functional&#xD;
capacity and poor quality of life. This systematic review&#xD;
synthesises evidence on Neuro Muscular Electrical&#xD;
Stimulation applications in both acute and chronic&#xD;
respiratory contexts, focusing on its effects on peripheral&#xD;
muscle strength, exercise tolerance, pulmonary function,&#xD;
and health-related quality of life. A structured literature&#xD;
search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar&#xD;
and MEDLINE and CINAHL accessed via the HyDi&#xD;
platform, covering publications from inception to 2025.&#xD;
In PubMed, both Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and&#xD;
free-text terms were used, while database-specific subject&#xD;
headings and keywords were adapted for MEDLINE&#xD;
and CINAHL. Eligible studies included randomised&#xD;
controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses&#xD;
investigating NMES in patients with COPD, acute&#xD;
exacerbations, or critical illness. A total of 61 articles&#xD;
were reviewed from which 5 were chosen. Key outcomes&#xD;
extracted included muscle strength, exercise capacity, pulmonary function indices, Health Related Quality of&#xD;
Life, and adverse events. Methodological quality and risk&#xD;
of bias were critically appraised to contextualise findings.&#xD;
Synthesis of the included meta-analyses demonstrated&#xD;
that NMES yields significant improvements in&#xD;
peripheral muscle function and functional capacity.&#xD;
Pooled results indicated a statistically significant&#xD;
increase in the six-minute walk distance (6MWD) of&#xD;
approximately 35–40 m following NMES compared&#xD;
with control interventions and a marked enhancement&#xD;
in quadriceps force production, particularly in severely&#xD;
deconditioned patients. Furthermore, systematic review&#xD;
data confirmed clinically meaningful improvements in&#xD;
health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and a reduction&#xD;
in exertional dyspnoea. A methodological appraisal via&#xD;
AMSTAR-II revealed high confidence in the systematic&#xD;
reviews, although the absence of pre-registered protocols&#xD;
was noted as a minor methodological deficit. NMES&#xD;
represents a safe and feasible adjunct to pulmonary&#xD;
rehabilitation and critical care, particularly for patients&#xD;
unable to engage in conventional exercise training.&#xD;
Nevertheless, long-term effectiveness, cost-effectiveness,&#xD;
and patient-centered outcomes remain underexplored.&#xD;
Future research should focus on protocol standardisation,&#xD;
integration with wearable and tele-rehabilitation&#xD;
technologies, and robust multicenter trials to clarify its&#xD;
role in routine respiratory rehabilitation.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/147304</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

