<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15055</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 14:26:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-07T14:26:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing the validity, reliability and usability of a newly developed smartphone based application in measuring chronic low back pain</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15800</link>
      <description>Title: Assessing the validity, reliability and usability of a newly developed smartphone based application in measuring chronic low back pain
Abstract: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is considered to be one of the biggest problems for public&#xD;
health systems in the western world. Physiotherapists rely on self- reporting from the&#xD;
patient to obtain the necessary information which is then transcribed into paper format.&#xD;
Though paper- based tools are valid, they present limitations as patients have to&#xD;
retrospectively remember their pain episodes. This can make the recorded information&#xD;
inaccurate. Mobile phone applications can help to avoid such problems. However studies&#xD;
on such technologies showed an apparent lack of user, clinician, or health service&#xD;
engagement in their development and minimal research on their effectiveness. The aim of&#xD;
the study was to investigate whether a newly developed application could be valid, reliable&#xD;
and usable. CLBP patients that were being treated by a physiotherapist at a&#xD;
musculoskeletal outpatient department were chosen as the study population. An&#xD;
application, called “Pain in the App”, was developed for this study. This application was&#xD;
transferred onto the participants’ smartphone for the 30 day collection period. Following&#xD;
data collection, a modified questionnaire was distributed to the participants. Statistical&#xD;
analysis showed that the application is valid when compared to the numerical rating scale&#xD;
(NRS) (p- value &lt;0.001). Results also suggest that the application is capable of recording&#xD;
data in a reliable and consistent manner (p- value &lt;0.001) and that the usability, the design&#xD;
elements adopted and the quality of clinical content were likened by the participants (pvalue&#xD;
0.729). The results obtained show a great potential of smartphone applications in&#xD;
healthcare and a satisfactory proof- of- concept.
Description: B.SC.(HONS)PHYSIOTHERAPY</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15800</guid>
      <dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The validity, reliability and usability of a newly developed  smartphone based application to assess acute musculoskeletal knee pain</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15758</link>
      <description>Title: The validity, reliability and usability of a newly developed  smartphone based application to assess acute musculoskeletal knee pain
Abstract: Pain assessment is one of the most important precursors for optimal pain management.&#xD;
Hence, optimising pain assessment becomes a necessity in health care. Smartphone&#xD;
applications may be developed to assess the main parameters of pain. Therefore, this&#xD;
study assessed the validity, reliability and usability of a newly developed pain&#xD;
application called ‘Pain in the App’. This smartphone application was tested on 13&#xD;
patients with acute musculoskeletal knee pain. Following one month of data collection,&#xD;
the data was analysed by comparing it with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) which is&#xD;
the gold standard for pain intensity. Both the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Spearman’s&#xD;
Rank Correlation Coefficient found compliance between the NRS and the data entered&#xD;
in the application, thus confirming concurrent validity. A good level of inter-rater&#xD;
reliability was also found for most participants as shown by the Kruskal-Wallis test.&#xD;
Through a questionnaire, ‘Pain in the App’ was assessed for usability where the&#xD;
Independent Samples T-test showed that participants gave the application high scores&#xD;
for usability, design and quality of content. In conclusion, this study targeted the lack of&#xD;
evidence related to smartphone based applications that assess pain. It has shed light on&#xD;
the use of such applications particularly for the management of acute pain. Moreover,&#xD;
this study also identified that further research is required in this field and provided&#xD;
recommendations for future studies with the ultimate aim to eliminate all the barriers for&#xD;
pain assessment.
Description: B.SC.(HONS)PHYSIOTHERAPY</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15758</guid>
      <dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The prevalence of shoulder overuse injuries in handball players : a local study</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15753</link>
      <description>Title: The prevalence of shoulder overuse injuries in handball players : a local study
Abstract: Background: Handball is an overhead throwing sport and athletes have a greater&#xD;
predisposition of developing overuse shoulder injuries. Glenohumeral Internal Rotation&#xD;
Deficit (GIRD) is a 20° lag of shoulder internal rotation that is known to be a precursor to&#xD;
overuse shoulder injuries.&#xD;
Purpose: This study was aimed at examining the prevalence of shoulder overuse injuries&#xD;
in Maltese handball players. It aimed to discover the risks of developing shoulder overuse&#xD;
injuries and to discover any associations with factors such as BMI, age, gender, training&#xD;
sessions per week, years of training level of play, position of play practice of other sport.&#xD;
Study Design: A positivist approach was chosen to test this anthropometric study.&#xD;
Methods: Questionnaires were used to collect data from all active handball players for&#xD;
season 2014/2015. The data collected included age, gender, contact details, history of&#xD;
shoulder surgeries, injuries and pain in the past, seasons playing handball, position of play,&#xD;
level of play, involvement in another sport, minutes of training per week and arm&#xD;
dominance. A physical examination was carried out on 46 handball players (those who met&#xD;
the inclusion criteria) to confirm the data collected through the questionnaire, and to&#xD;
measure weight and height. Medial and Lateral rotation of both arms were measured using&#xD;
a bubble inclinometer with the athlete in supine, shoulder abducted to 90° and elbow&#xD;
flexed to 90° in the plane of the scapula. SPSS® was used to generate results.&#xD;
Results: There was a significant difference in GIRD on the dominant arm in different&#xD;
gender groups (t = 3.168 p &lt; 0.001) and athletes who have been playing for longer than&#xD;
others (t = 2.178 p &lt; 0.035). There was also a significant difference in GIRD on the nondominant&#xD;
arm in athletes who play in different positions (f = 2.961 p &lt; 0.043). There was&#xD;
no significant difference in GIRD in other categories. Conclusion: Male athletes with a longer career in handball and those athletes who play&#xD;
with pain would appear to have a greater predisposition to GIRD related injuries.
Description: B.SC.(HONS)PHYSIOTHERAPY</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/15753</guid>
      <dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

