<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/19988</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 19:54:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-17T19:54:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>A tale of two European courts : Strasbourg and Luxembourg. How is the citizen protected?</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145426</link>
      <description>Title: A tale of two European courts : Strasbourg and Luxembourg. How is the citizen protected?
Authors: Sammut, Ivan
Abstract: This paper examines the legal distinction between the two European courts that are often&#xD;
conflated, yet are markedly different. The Court of Justice of the European Union, based in&#xD;
Luxembourg is the EU's Court, but it also directly influences national legal systems. It&#xD;
cannot be considered an international court in the literal sense. The European Court of&#xD;
Human Rights in Strasbourg is an international court par excellence, belonging to the&#xD;
Council of Europe, yet it is more accessible to individuals. Both courts address human rights&#xD;
in very different ways, but the CJEU's role is more limited in Human Rights and has a wider&#xD;
impact on individuals beyond Human Rights. Both courts contribute to European integration&#xD;
in their own way, yet they cannot be compared. They may be seen as competitors, but also as&#xD;
partners in some respects. This paper examines the relationship between the two and how it&#xD;
may evolve over the next decade or so. It examines the court from both individual and&#xD;
systemic perspectives, focusing on its contribution to stability and the rule of law. Finally, the&#xD;
paper examines how the possible relationship between the two can evolve in the individual's&#xD;
interest.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145426</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Istanbul Convention, domestic violence legislation and child–parent relations, a case of false friends?</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145023</link>
      <description>Title: The Istanbul Convention, domestic violence legislation and child–parent relations, a case of false friends?
Authors: Sammut, Ivan
Abstract: Much has been written about the Istanbul Convention and domestic violence. A vast literature also exists&#xD;
on child–parent relations, sometimes described as parental alienation, though the term itself involves a&#xD;
never-ending debate. This article does not seek to debate either the Istanbul Convention or Parental&#xD;
Alienation itself. Rather, it seeks to examine how legislation intended to combat domestic violence can&#xD;
potentially lead perpetrators, including the State itself, to commit some form of domestic violence against,&#xD;
in this case, the least favoured parent. While every legislation has its pros and cons, this article intends to&#xD;
make the case that, in some cases, domestic violence legislation can itself be abused and lead to forms of&#xD;
domestic violence, in particular, psychological violence against some children and some of their parents.&#xD;
The family law of a civilized country should strive to maintain child–parent relationships and repair them&#xD;
when they are broken, for whatever reason. If it does not, or if it fails for any reason, then Article 8 of the&#xD;
ECHR may come into play. A brief case study of the Maltese domestic violence legislation, namely Chapters&#xD;
581 and 636 of the Laws of Malta, can be provided. Hence, does the Istanbul Convention need reform?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/145023</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Case report : Court of Justice of the European Union : Case C-452/23 Fastned Deutschland GmbH &amp; Co. KG v Die Autobahn GmbH des Bundes</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/144825</link>
      <description>Title: Case report : Court of Justice of the European Union : Case C-452/23 Fastned Deutschland GmbH &amp; Co. KG v Die Autobahn GmbH des Bundes
Authors: Sammut, Ivan
Abstract: The Court of Justice provides clarity on the circumstances in which a concession&#xD;
may be modified without a new award procedure. The possibility&#xD;
of modifying a concession contract without a new award procedure in certain&#xD;
circumstances are also available in the context of a concession originally&#xD;
awarded to an in-house entity where the concessionaire has subsequently&#xD;
been privatised.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/144825</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Parental alienation in family court in Malta and the lack of state intervention or proper preventative legislation</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/143509</link>
      <description>Title: Parental alienation in family court in Malta and the lack of state intervention or proper preventative legislation
Authors: Sammut, Ivan
Abstract: This paper analyses these concepts from the point of view of the Maltese legal&#xD;
system and the Family Court in Malta. First, it depicts the Maltese Family&#xD;
Court situation, underlying how one may conclude that certain practices&#xD;
and procedures in Malta infringe art 8 of the ECHR. The following section&#xD;
deals with parental alienation and human rights. Then through a study of&#xD;
a case by the ECtHR against Malta, the paper explains the hot issues that&#xD;
need to be addressed so that the Maltese Family Court falls in line with the&#xD;
ECHR. The paper’s final part concludes with recommendations for Malta to&#xD;
be in line with the ECHR. In this paper, Malta is taken as a microcosm of&#xD;
many European Family Courts who also face similar challenges to be in line&#xD;
with human rights regarding child access and maintenance.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/143509</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

