<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/24235</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:39:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-23T21:39:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The use of technology in the promotion of children’s emotional intelligence : the multimedia program “Developing Emotional Intelligence”</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29675</link>
      <description>Title: The use of technology in the promotion of children’s emotional intelligence : the multimedia program “Developing Emotional Intelligence”
Authors: D'Amico, Antonella
Abstract: "Developing Emotional Intelligence” is an Italian language multimedia tool created for&#xD;
children between 8 and 12 years of age. The software is based on the four ‘branches’ of&#xD;
model of emotional intelligence proposed by Mayer and Salovey and aims to evaluate&#xD;
and improve abilities in perception of emotions; using emotion to facilitate thought;&#xD;
understanding emotions; and managing emotions. In the software, four characters&#xD;
represent the four branches of emotional intelligence and guide children through the&#xD;
‘world of emotions’ using drawings, animations, music, sounds and verbal instructions.&#xD;
The software is comprised of two components, namely an assessment section (27 items)&#xD;
and a training section (46 exercises). Both the assessment and the training sections aim&#xD;
to measure and improve children’s abilities in perceiving emotions (faces, drawings and&#xD;
music); using emotions (emotional synaesthesia and facilitation); understanding&#xD;
emotions (blend and transformation of emotions); and managing emotions (personal and&#xD;
interpersonal situations). Two studies involving primary and secondary school children&#xD;
respectively, demonstrated the efficacy of the training performed with the software in&#xD;
improving performance in emotional tasks and academic achievement in the linguisticliterary&#xD;
area. A comparison between the two studies offers interesting insights about the&#xD;
best ways to integrate technology in social and emotional learning programs.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2018 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29675</guid>
      <dc:date>2018-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Short research paper : academic optimism and organizational citizenship behaviour amongst secondary school teachers</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29674</link>
      <description>Title: Short research paper : academic optimism and organizational citizenship behaviour amongst secondary school teachers
Authors: Makvandi, Abdollah; Naderi, Farah; Makvandi, Behnam; Pasha, Reza; Ehteshamzadeh, Parvin
Abstract: Academic optimism and organizational citizenship behaviour amongst&#xD;
secondary school teachers</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2018 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29674</guid>
      <dc:date>2018-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Beyond the ‘diminished self’ : challenging an array of objections to emotional well-being in education</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29673</link>
      <description>Title: Beyond the ‘diminished self’ : challenging an array of objections to emotional well-being in education
Authors: Downes, Paul
Abstract: With early school leaving prevention being an agreed European Union headline target of&#xD;
10% across the EU by 2020, emotional-relational dimensions to education are gaining&#xD;
renewed attention in European education policy. Against this backdrop, prominent&#xD;
criticisms of an emotional well-being agenda in education by Ecclestone and Hayes&#xD;
require further consideration. The key objective of this paper is to challenge and&#xD;
reconstruct six key arguments of Ecclestone and Hayes against emotional wellbeing in&#xD;
education. There is a need to move beyond paradigms of conceptual coherence that rest&#xD;
upon diametric oppositions – thought/feeling, healthy/sick, diminished/undiminished,&#xD;
optimism/pessimism, subject/negation of a subject, learning/therapy. It is argued that an&#xD;
emotional well-being agenda in education is a conceptually coherent one, once different&#xD;
levels of prevention and intervention are distinguished and the argument goes beyond&#xD;
flat, undifferentiated conceptions of ‘therapeutic culture’. The Cartesian model&#xD;
supported by Ecclestone and Hayes to frame a ‘diminished’ self is but one selfhood. A&#xD;
more nuanced debate would focus on the strengths and weaknesses of different,&#xD;
pluralistic conceptions of selfhood. Their most substantive objections to an emotional&#xD;
well-being agenda in education concern deficit labelling and privacy and are important&#xD;
cautionary notes.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2018 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29673</guid>
      <dc:date>2018-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inclusive education : beyond popular discourses</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29672</link>
      <description>Title: Inclusive education : beyond popular discourses
Authors: Portelli, John Peter; Koneeny, Patricia
Abstract: The popular discourse of democratic education is home to numerous myths surrounding&#xD;
our conceptions of what inclusion means in today’s schools. Certain beliefs like the idea&#xD;
that offering equal opportunities for participation to all students regardless of individual&#xD;
need, which conflates equality and equity, or that democracy in classrooms involves&#xD;
nothing more than limitless inclusion are upheld as go-to solutions for the inevitable&#xD;
dilemmas for educators committed to inclusion. This paper argues that philosophical&#xD;
clarification of the concept of inclusion is urgently required by teachers, policy makers,&#xD;
and theorists of education committed to both democracy in education and democratic&#xD;
education. Our most urgent concern is related to the inherent attitude toward deficit&#xD;
implied by different understandings of inclusion. This is not necessarily due to the&#xD;
unclarities and ambiguities associated with the concept itself, but rather reflect the&#xD;
calculated and anticipatory way educators tend to approach classroom practice. We&#xD;
argue that with careful philosophical clarification, along with an entirely new stance on&#xD;
the part of teachers regarding their pedagogical practice and a reconceptualized notion of&#xD;
student ‘needs’, the concept of inclusion can continue to remain not only useful but&#xD;
essential to creating a robust democratic community in the classroom.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2018 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29672</guid>
      <dc:date>2018-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

