<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28525</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 17:15:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-08T17:15:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ten million new Turkish voters in 2011 : where they come from? How they voted? What it means for the future?</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30946</link>
      <description>Title: Ten million new Turkish voters in 2011 : where they come from? How they voted? What it means for the future?
Authors: Akarca, Ali T.
Abstract: Between 2007 and 2011 the number of registered voters in Turkey increased by more than ten million, partially due to population increase but mainly due to a change in the voter registration system. Together with nearly three million DP and GP supporters who deserted their parties, the new voters constituted about a quarter of the electorate who participated in the 2011 election. Through descriptive statistics at national, regional and provincial levels, the geographical, demographic, socio-economic and political characteristics of these voters are explored. Then through systems of party vote equations, estimated separately for different regions of the country, how they voted is investigated. The BDP was the main beneficiary of the rise in the registered voters, which were disproportionately located in the Central-east and South-east. This occurred at the expense of the ruling AKP. The DP and GP votes, which were concentrated in the western and central parts of the country, and the new voters in these regions moved mainly to the AKP and CHP. In central provinces, the MHP captured a slice of the new voters and former DP supporters too, but it lost a portion of its own supporters to the CHP in the West.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30946</guid>
      <dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>European training path for 21st century school leaders</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30945</link>
      <description>Title: European training path for 21st century school leaders
Authors: Franzoni, Simona; Gennari, Francesca
Abstract: This article investigates the competences of school leaders needed to develop learning communities (LCs) in the context of European school governance systems. It shows the output of a two-years project “School Governance to build a Learning Community” supported by European Union, with the involvement of Sweden, The Netherlands, Italy, Greece and Romania. Basing on an empirical research, we designed an “European Training Path” for school leaders who want to build LCs. The training path is planned to be sharable in the EU countries and, at the same time, differentiable on the basis of each country’s particular needs.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30945</guid>
      <dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The determinants of new orders of non-defence capital goods and its relationship to business fixed investment expenditures : 1992 to 2010</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30873</link>
      <description>Title: The determinants of new orders of non-defence capital goods and its relationship to business fixed investment expenditures : 1992 to 2010
Authors: Mair, Douglas; Charos, Evangelos; Kazemi, Hossein; Laramy, Anthony J.
Abstract: The determinant of nonfarm nonfinancial corporation orders of nondefense capital goods (as generated by the Census Bureau) is modelled during the period of 1992 to 2010. Statistically significant relationship between investment orders and the cyclical variations in output, the interest rate spread, net cash flows, the net increase in financial liabilities, the net increase in financial assets, and the value of (nondefense) manufacturing shipments is found. During the period 1992 to 2001, the wage share is inversely related to new orders. New orders are used to explain, subject to a lag, nonfarm nonfinancial corporations fixed investment expenditures, as generated by the BEA. A statistically significant relationship is found between investment expenditures and new orders, subject to modifications by changes contemporaneous economic conditions (largely reflected in cyclical changes in output, and, to a lesser extent, changes in the interest rate spread).</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30873</guid>
      <dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Toward a common tax regime for the European Union countries</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30872</link>
      <description>Title: Toward a common tax regime for the European Union countries
Authors: Liapis, Konstantinos J.; Rovolis, Antonios; Galanos, Christos
Abstract: The tax burden on wages, profits, property, and goods or services has a serious impact on cross-country competiveness, something that, in turn, impinges strongly on the actual economy of common markets such as the European Union (EU). While the mobility of productive factors is directly related with country tax-regime differences, government budget funding from tax revenues and rates are the main fiscal policy tools. This article analyzes the trends, similarities and differences between the tax regimes of European Monetary Union (EMU) for the period from1995 to 2019. The methodologies we employ include time series analysis, regression analysis and multivariate cluster analysis. The data are mainly collected from the OECD database and tax revenue departments at country level. We argue that there are significant differences among the tax regimes of EU countries and that no policy has been implemented to ensure tax homogeneity across the EU, nor is there any likelihood of such. The anarchy in fiscal policy is an obstacle for the European Integration. Budget deficits have an impact on taxation and countries, invariably, manage the recent debt crisis by selecting different taxes as fiscal policy tools. Our article presents the differences between tax regimes of EMU countries and shows that the level of economic growth affects the structure of taxes at work and alters the performance of different types of taxes; is also wishes to explain the factors that differentiate tax regimes by using multi dimensional criteria and variance analysis. Our work contributes to the debate toward a common tax regime between EU countries and our analysis is concentrated on this.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30872</guid>
      <dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

