<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/31657</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 10:30:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-05T10:30:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Shared care guidelines for patient medicines management in breast and colon cancer</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/55729</link>
      <description>Title: Shared care guidelines for patient medicines management in breast and colon cancer
Abstract: The introduction of oral chemotherapy has lead to cancer patients receiving these &#xD;
medications through community pharmacies rather than having to visit a hospital to have &#xD;
their oncology medication administered. This change represents a shift from therapy &#xD;
being given in hospital, to therapy being given in the patient’s own home. In this context, &#xD;
community pharmacists can provide a significant intervention by supporting patients to &#xD;
manage and prevent oral chemotherapy side effects, thus avoiding unwarranted trips to &#xD;
hospital, which saves money and time, resulting in an improvement in the patient’s &#xD;
quality of life. The aim of this research was to compile shared care guidelines for oral &#xD;
chemotherapy used in the management of breast, colon and prostate cancer. &#xD;
 &#xD;
Five shared care guidelines were created for: capecitabine, everolimus, abiraterone, &#xD;
enzalutamide and ruxolitinib.  The developed documents were validated by a panel of &#xD;
experts consisting of four oncologists, a principal and a senior pharmacist within the &#xD;
compounding section at Mater Dei Hospital, and a senior pharmacist at Sir Anthony &#xD;
Mamo Oncology Hospital. A patient focus group was developed during which five &#xD;
patients receiving oral chemotherapy from a community pharmacy were invited to &#xD;
participate in the focus group and given a questionnaire to capture the patient’s experience &#xD;
about the service received from the community pharmacist. The developed shared care &#xD;
guidelines were presented to community pharmacists during an educational program &#xD;
about managing chemotherapy side effects. Scored questionnaires were handed out to the &#xD;
pharmacists before and after the program to determine if there was an improvement in &#xD;
responses. &#xD;
	&#xD;
The validation panel reported on the content and validity of the shared care guidelines &#xD;
developed. The educational program was carried out for 11 community pharmacists who &#xD;
are currently practicing in community pharmacies where dispensing of oncology oral &#xD;
therapy is undertaken.  The mean response rate before the educational program was &#xD;
5.45% whilst the mean response rate after the program was 80%. From the patient focus &#xD;
group issues related to information presented to the patient about what side effects to be &#xD;
expected, how these side effects should be handled and how these medications should be &#xD;
stored were identified.  These points were used to develop the framework for the shared &#xD;
care guidelines and each guideline now consists of indications, administration, side effects &#xD;
and storage information.  &#xD;
 &#xD;
The shared care guidelines were developed within a collaborative framework and are &#xD;
intended to further substantiate effective communication between healthcare professionals &#xD;
at different settings, namely: the hospital multidisciplinary team and the community &#xD;
pharmacist dispensing the oral chemotherapy drugs.
Description: PharmD</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/55729</guid>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Detecting signals of electrocardiogram QT prolongation and QT shortening : regulatory implications</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/55728</link>
      <description>Title: Detecting signals of electrocardiogram QT prolongation and QT shortening : regulatory implications
Abstract: Drug-induced changes to the conductivity of the human ether-a-go-go related gene &#xD;
(hERG) potassium channels, affect cardiac repolarisation and put patients at risk of fatal &#xD;
cardiac arrhythmias such as Torsade de Pointes. Healthcare professionals and patients &#xD;
benefit from knowing which medicinal products cause this adverse event, in order to &#xD;
minimise co-prescribing of such drugs or to carry out appropriate monitoring.   &#xD;
 &#xD;
The aim of this study was to detect and characterize the QT change liability of authorised &#xD;
medicinal products. The methodology was in two parts. Study 1 involved extracting &#xD;
signals from the Eudravigilance database, and in study 2 an in-depth assessment of &#xD;
unexpected signals through review of literature, preclinical, adverse drug reaction and &#xD;
clinical trial data was performed. Proportional reporting ratios were used to identify &#xD;
statistical associations between drugs and QT change and expectedness was checked &#xD;
through the product information (PI).  A list for the frequency of expectedness was &#xD;
created.  Drugs not expected to cause QT changes were evaluated within the Bradford&#xD;
Hill criteria for association.  &#xD;
 &#xD;
Four hundred and seventeen candidates with a potential signal of QT modulation were &#xD;
identified. Of these, 12 products did not have QT change as an expected adverse event &#xD;
and so were assessed. Results from the assessment showed that changes to the PI of &#xD;
mirabegron, asenapine and pantoprazole could be warranted and signals on QT &#xD;
prolongation for mirabegron and asenapine were reported to the European Medicines &#xD;
Agency’s Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC).  In March 2017, the &#xD;
PRAC rapporteurs for these active substances (Spain and United Kingdom) agreed to &#xD;
take regulatory action and update the SPCs within the next periodic safety review &#xD;
procedures, starting in quarter four 2017.  For pantoprazole, an emergent signal of &#xD;
hypokalaemia may warrant further separate investigation. For QT shortening, fingolimod &#xD;
and olanzapine were assessed, and the data for these two drugs did not lead to a &#xD;
recommendation for change to the PI due to lack of robust evidence.    &#xD;
 &#xD;
In conclusion, this study presents a number of outputs; (1) inferences on (a) mirabegron, &#xD;
(b) asenapine and (c) pantoprazole, (2) assessment recommendations for preclinical &#xD;
assessors and marketing authorisation holders looking at hERG studies, (3) reflections on &#xD;
the pharmacological basis of short QT, and (4) an innovative proposal for a QT drugs list &#xD;
with risk categorisation.
Description: PharmD</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/55728</guid>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patient-centred monitoring in chronic disease management in the community pharmacy</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/55727</link>
      <description>Title: Patient-centred monitoring in chronic disease management in the community pharmacy
Abstract: Chronic diseases present a number of challenges for healthcare systems worldwide. &#xD;
Community pharmacists are in a unique position to participate in the chronic care of &#xD;
their patients through patient monitoring and medication management. The aim of this &#xD;
research was to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-led chronic disease management &#xD;
service by identifying drug-related problems (DRPs) and assessing the pharmacist &#xD;
intervention on patient health outcomes. A chronic disease management service was &#xD;
implemented in a community pharmacy. Fifty patients taking at least one chronic &#xD;
medication were recruited. Two medication review sessions were held; an initial session &#xD;
and a follow-up session after 4 months. During the sessions, point-of-care testing for &#xD;
blood pressure, blood glucose and HbA1c monitoring as well as lifestyle advice were &#xD;
provided. A pharmaceutical care plan with recommendations to solve DRPs was &#xD;
developed for each patient.  Forty-eight patients completed the study, with a mean age &#xD;
of 69 years and taking an average of 5 medications daily. A total of 207 DRPs were &#xD;
identified with a mean of 4.25 DRPs per patient, which mainly involved undertreatment &#xD;
(18.8%), monitoring (18.4%) and compliance (17.9%) issues. Most DRPs were solved &#xD;
(78.6%) or partially solved (16.5%). Following the pharmacist intervention, there was a &#xD;
decrease in systolic blood pressure by 10mmHg (p&lt;0.001), diastolic blood pressure by &#xD;
4mmHg (p=0.001), fasting blood glucose by 1.7mmol/L (p&lt;0.001) and HbA1c level by &#xD;
0.5% (p&lt;0.001). Medication compliance improved from a mean score of 17.7 to 21.7 &#xD;
out of a total score of 25 (p&lt;0.001) and patient satisfaction increased from a mean score &#xD;
of 2.61 to 4.11 after intervention out of a total score of 5 (p&lt;0.001). The patient-centred &#xD;
monitoring service had a significant positive impact, suggesting that expanding the role &#xD;
of community pharmacists in chronic disease management can improve patient health &#xD;
outcomes.
Description: PharmD</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/55727</guid>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Safer anticoagulation management in the community : a pharmacist-led approach</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/55726</link>
      <description>Title: Safer anticoagulation management in the community : a pharmacist-led approach
Abstract: Therapeutic monitoring in patients on warfarin is essential to enhance treatment efficacy &#xD;
with less complications. Medicine use review (MUR) enables individualised patient &#xD;
assessment to check and balance drug-related problems (DRPs). The aim of this &#xD;
research was to develop and implement a pharmacist-led MUR for patients on warfarin, &#xD;
assess patient knowledge and adherence, and address identified risks with prescribed &#xD;
treatment. Patients on warfarin attended a structured MUR session, during which &#xD;
baseline information to assess patient knowledge and adherence to warfarin treatment was collected. Point-of-care INR testing was performed with the CoaguChek®XS &#xD;
device. Medication reconciliation was performed to identify DRPs and to recommend &#xD;
clinical interventions. Patients were followed-up after two months to evaluate the &#xD;
impact of pharmacist intervention and degree of implementation of the pharmacist &#xD;
researcher‟s recommendations by the physician, pharmacist or patient. A total of 100 &#xD;
patients (56 male, 44 female; mean age 70.5 ±10.30, range 33-89 years) were assessed. &#xD;
Forty patients had an INR value outside the target range. The mean score in the warfarin &#xD;
knowledge test improved significantly from 7 to 10 points out of 12 post-intervention &#xD;
(p&lt;0.05). The number of patients who were non-adherent to warfarin decreased from 25 &#xD;
to 11 post-intervention (p&lt;0.05). Post-intervention a significant improvement in INR &#xD;
control was observed where time spent within therapeutic range increased from 69% to &#xD;
80% (p&lt;0.05). A total of 632 medications were reconciled (mean 6 ±2.76, range 1-16 &#xD;
medications/patient). A total of 481 DRPs (mean 5 ±1.83, range 0-9 DRPs/patient) were &#xD;
identified, out of which 40% were related to warfarin. Need for monitoring (30%), lack &#xD;
of compliance (20%) and need for patient education (19%) were the top three DRPs &#xD;
identified. Eighty-four percent of the pharmacist researcher‟s recommendations were &#xD;
accepted, 20% of which resulted in changes to drug treatment. Ninety patients would be &#xD;
willing to use the proposed MUR service, if implemented. Improvement in patient &#xD;
knowledge, adherence, INR control and the high proportion of implemented &#xD;
recommendations suggest that pharmacist-led MUR improves therapeutic outcomes and &#xD;
patient safety.
Description: PharmD</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/55726</guid>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

