<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Community:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/321</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 20:59:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-05-28T20:59:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lingering colonialism in the women peace and security agenda</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146907</link>
      <description>Title: Lingering colonialism in the women peace and security agenda
Abstract: This paper will examine the persistent colonial legacies embedded within the Women, Peace, and&#xD;
Security (WPS) agenda and argues that its continued Eurocentric orientation undermines its&#xD;
legitimacy, effectiveness, and acceptance in the Global South. While WPS was conceived as a&#xD;
transformative framework for advancing gender-responsive peace and security, its implementation&#xD;
remains shaped by institutions, funding structures, and policy approaches rooted in eurocentric&#xD;
epistemologies. These dynamics often position women as a homogenous category, overlook diverse&#xD;
intersectional experiences, and can reproduce unequal power relations between "designers" and&#xD;
"recipients" of WPS interventions. As a result, many actors in the Global South perceive WPS as&#xD;
externally imposed and insufficiently responsive to their diverse sociopolitical realities, thus leading to&#xD;
a failure of WPS implementation programming.; Rather than proposing to place or shift blame on one actor, this paper applies existing feminist and&#xD;
decolonial scholarship to illuminate these tensions and offer constructive pathways forward. Drawing&#xD;
on Charlesworth, Chinkin, and Wright's feminist approaches to international law, Pinto and Nash's&#xD;
analysis of feminism's "bad objects," and Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL)&#xD;
articulated by Mutua and Anghie, the paper identifies how well-intentioned WPS actors may&#xD;
inadvertently perpetuate the very structures they seek to dismantle. The analysis situates these&#xD;
critiques within the broader context of EU policy and examines the European Council as a case study&#xD;
to demonstrate how institutional practices can reinforce or challenge colonial patterns in WPS&#xD;
implementation. At a time when more than 600 million women and girls are affected by conflict, a 50&#xD;
percent increase in a decade, reframing WPS through decolonial, feminist, and TWAIL-informed&#xD;
perspectives is both urgent and necessary. This paper argues for an inclusive, context-driven, and cocreative&#xD;
approach to Euro-Arab cooperation that elevates Global South and Indigenous contributions,&#xD;
ultimately strengthening the transformative potential of the WPS agenda.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146907</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"A place to be ourselves" : a qualitative exploration of identity, community, and safety for LGBTIQ+ amateur athletes at European sport events</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146906</link>
      <description>Title: "A place to be ourselves" : a qualitative exploration of identity, community, and safety for LGBTIQ+ amateur athletes at European sport events
Abstract: Mainstream sport environments are often characterized by pervasive heteronormativity and&#xD;
cisnormativity, creating barriers for LGBTIQ+ individuals (Gil-Quintana et al., 2022; Lahti et al., 2024;&#xD;
Pride Sports, 2016; Outsport, 2020). Major LGBTIQ+ sport events like the Eurogames and Gay Games&#xD;
function as crucial "alternative spaces" designed to be inclusive (Smiler et al., 2021). However, there is&#xD;
a research gap concerning the in-depth, lived experiences and identity management of the diverse&#xD;
amateur athletes who attend (European Travel Commission, 2018; Kauhanen, 2015; Smiler et al.,&#xD;
2021). This study addresses this gap through a qualitative exploration of these athletes' tourism&#xD;
experiences. Adopting an interpretivist paradigm, this research aims to explore the lived experiences&#xD;
of LGBTIQ+ amateur athletes, focusing on perceptions of safety, inclusivity, and community formation&#xD;
(cf. Smiler et al., 2021). It also seeks to analyze how participation influences their "identity work" and&#xD;
self-expression (Lahti et al., 2024; Smiler et al., 2021). The methodology involves semi- structured&#xD;
interviews conducted with a purposive sample of athletes from various European countries , ensuring&#xD;
representation across the LGBTIQ+ spectrum, a group often under- represented in research&#xD;
(European Travel Commission, 2018; Gil-Quintana et al., 2022). Data will be analyzed using thematic&#xD;
analysis and narrative analysis (Lahti et al., 2024) to understand how athletes construct their identities&#xD;
and experiences in this unique context. This study will provide rich, nuanced insights into the&#xD;
transformative potential of these events, highlighting their role in fostering community and enabling&#xD;
authentic self-expression (Smiler et al., 2021). Findings will inform actionable recommendations for&#xD;
event organizers and tourism stakeholders to improve inclusivity , moving beyond tokenism to create&#xD;
genuinely affirming environments (cf. Molinie, n.d.; Gil-Quintana et al., 2022).</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146906</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Victims of political violence ; recognition of harm</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146901</link>
      <description>Title: Victims of political violence ; recognition of harm
Abstract: Victims of political violence have increasingly become a central focus in scholarship on peace&#xD;
processes, cycles of violence, and the broader societal impacts of conflict. Beyond immediate harm to&#xD;
individuals, political violence reshapes communities, institutions, and collective memory. This paper&#xD;
argues that both the experience of victimhood and the legal and socio-legal responses to political&#xD;
violence are profoundly gendered processes.; Focusing on key gendered dimensions of victimhood, the paper examines how &lt;harm= is defined&#xD;
within legal and policy frameworks, often privileging certain forms of violence while marginalising&#xD;
others more commonly experienced by women. It further explores the lived realities of surviving&#xD;
political violence, highlighting the enduring physical, psychological, and socio-economic burdens&#xD;
placed on survivors. Particular attention is given to the disproportionate responsibilities borne by&#xD;
women, who frequently act as caregivers, community stabilisers, and custodians of memory in postconflict&#xD;
contexts.; By analysing these dynamics, the paper demonstrates how gender shapes recognition, redress, and&#xD;
resilience. It calls for more inclusive and gender-sensitive approaches to addressing political violence,&#xD;
ensuring that diverse experiences of harm and survival are acknowledged within both transitional&#xD;
justice mechanisms and broader peacebuilding efforts.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146901</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Same-sex families perceptions on (in)equality and legal frameworks in Greece</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146895</link>
      <description>Title: Same-sex families perceptions on (in)equality and legal frameworks in Greece
Abstract: In this paper, Greece is considered as a case study, a Balkan country-nation that holds strong values&#xD;
for sexuality and gender, yet voted for same-sex marriage at the end of 2024. In Greece, when policies&#xD;
attempt to legislate or regulate family relations that, on a theoretical level, question the hegemony of&#xD;
the biologically or genetically determined heteropatriarchal 'blood ties' (as same-sex families do in the&#xD;
social imaginary in Greece), a notable intensification of the essentialist attitudes towards kinship and&#xD;
parenthood is emerging. Those attitudes attempt to defend the dominance of 'traditional' and 'official'&#xD;
cultural conceptualisations of the family. The relationship between gender, parenthood, and kinship&#xD;
takes on socio-emotional standards rather than biological connotations, and becomes a field of&#xD;
conflict, negotiation, and multiple ways of kinship (Kantsa, 2015:370).; In 2024, 60% of the population supported same-sex marriage, whereas only 35.8% endorsed the right&#xD;
of same-sex couples to adopt. Society often does not accept gays and lesbians as parents. This can&#xD;
make them feel isolated and lonely in the future. Because kinship is tied to procreation, in the&#xD;
majority's opinion, pink families cannot be sexually productive and are set apart from the rest of&#xD;
humanity because they choose not to accept heteronormativity (Weston, 1991).; To inquire about the qualitative interaction between institutional change and social acceptance, the&#xD;
paper explores how same-sex families (gay and lesbian parents/couples) perceive societal&#xD;
reactions/acceptance of Law 4356/2015 on the extension of the Civil Partnership Act for same-sex&#xD;
couples; whether institutional changes of 2015 affected the societal reactions/acceptance (RQ1).&#xD;
Moreover, the paper further questions the terms under which the legal recognition of the same sex&#xD;
family and kinship is defined. Does law foresee the differentiated characteristics of queer kinship or&#xD;
normalise the queer forms of livelihood and kinship?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/146895</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

