<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32591</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 10:40:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-10T10:40:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The constitution and religion in Malta between 1921 and 1974</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32704</link>
      <description>Title: The constitution and religion in Malta between 1921 and 1974
Abstract: Malta had eight Constitutions between 1921 and 1974 Of these, the&#xD;
most important, in so far as religious matters are concerned, are the Self Government&#xD;
(1921), the Independence (1964) and the Republic Constitution&#xD;
(1974). What these three Constitutions have in common is that they all&#xD;
recognize the right to freedom of conscience and worship. In fact, the&#xD;
formulation which the Constitution of 1921 gives of this right is retained in&#xD;
subsequent Constitutions. For this reason, it may sound somewhat strange&#xD;
to speak of the constitutional history of this right in Malta. Yet, it is&#xD;
possible to see this right in a historical perspective, because the context&#xD;
varies from one Constitution to the other. The 1921 Constitution contains&#xD;
only one section on religion which, in the first place, affirms everyone's&#xD;
right to freedom of conscience and worship and, secondly, prohibits&#xD;
religious discrimination in any public career. While declaring the Roman&#xD;
Catholic religion as the religion of Malta and guaranteeing freedom and&#xD;
independence to the Roman Catholic Church, the 1964 Constitution&#xD;
includes freedom of conscience and worship as well as equality of&#xD;
treatment, prohibiting religious (and other forms of) discrimination, among&#xD;
the fundamental human rights. The 1974 Constitution does substantially the&#xD;
same except that it practically abolishes the special guarantee which the&#xD;
Roman Catholic Church enjoyed under the previous Constitution.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 1985 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32704</guid>
      <dc:date>1985-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The form and function of the nativity stories in Luke</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32700</link>
      <description>Title: The form and function of the nativity stories in Luke
Abstract: The purpose of this essay is to explore the form of Lk. 1:5 - 2:52 and&#xD;
its function in the Gospel. Although some good work has been done&#xD;
showing how the content of the first two chapters fits within the author's&#xD;
theological plan, not much attention has been devoted to the relationship&#xD;
of the form of Lk. 1 - 2 to the author's purpose.&#xD;
As a point of departure, I will suggest that the author intended his&#xD;
gospel to be recited in worship, not piece meal, a few verses at a sitting, but&#xD;
as a whole, from beginning to end. Whereas many have suggested that Lk.&#xD;
1 - 2 represents a translation of a Hebrew original, or on the other hand, the&#xD;
product of the creative spirit of the author, I will try to show that these&#xD;
chapters are best understood in connection with the worship of the&#xD;
Christian community - that the language and the form of the material is&#xD;
liturgical, and was intended to serve a special function in the recitation. of the&#xD;
gospel.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 1985 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32700</guid>
      <dc:date>1985-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sin and holiness</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32698</link>
      <description>Title: Sin and holiness
Abstract: Sin seems to be quite a serious topic, particularly for Christians. But no&#xD;
one who reflects on sin is indifferent to it. Even advertisements indicate&#xD;
this. Perhaps you might have seen an ad which goes something like: 'Drink&#xD;
Maxwell Coffee - It Tastes So Good It's Sinful'. Today when belief is&#xD;
undergoing an enormous amount of critical inspection, the notion of sin,&#xD;
like most doctrines of faith, has come under severe re-examination. Hence a&#xD;
thorough re-thinking of the concept of sin has become one of the most&#xD;
urgent concerns of moral theology and such related human sciences' as&#xD;
psychology and sociology. But sin is a negation, and a negation has&#xD;
meaning only in relation to the positive it negates. Thus any discussion of&#xD;
sin would be lacking and perhaps even depressing unless it is considered in&#xD;
the context of grace which redeems and saves. In other words, it makes little&#xD;
sense to speak of sin without remembering man's call to holiness. The&#xD;
concern to discern the ferments of good and evil within modern man has&#xD;
long caused many people to direct at him and his environment a questioning&#xD;
gaze. It is the gaze of historians and sociologists, theologians and&#xD;
psychologists but above all of pastors. However, as a psychologist vitally&#xD;
interested in spirituality, I would like, in this article, to consider the theme of&#xD;
sin and holiness from a psycho-theological perspective. Discernment of the&#xD;
particular sins requires a full study of the corresponding virtues themselves.&#xD;
Therefore while looking at the question of sin in general, we shall also&#xD;
explore as Christians, what we are called by God to be and to become.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 1985 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32698</guid>
      <dc:date>1985-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Etica, cultura e religione</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32684</link>
      <description>Title: Etica, cultura e religione
Abstract: La societa contemporanea, sia quella orient ale che occidentale, sia&#xD;
&#xD;
quella borghese che comunista, e stata colpita da una crisi di valori, soprattutto morali, che non conosce precedenti nella storia. Nessuna altra epoca&#xD;
&#xD;
storica ha sperimentato una cosi radicale esplosione di iminoralita e di&#xD;
amoralita come la nostra. L'epoca in cui viviamo, come ha ben intuito&#xD;
Nietzsche, e caratterizzata daI completo nichilismo. Nichilismo significa che&#xD;
la morale cristiana e tramontata e che una nuova morale non e ancora sorta.&#xD;
"Che cosa significa nichilismo? Che i valori supremi sono svalorizzati.&#xD;
Manca lo scopo. Manca la risposta alIa domanda: 'Perche?' "</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 1985 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32684</guid>
      <dc:date>1985-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

