<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32808</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 13:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-12T13:16:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Development of protocols for continuing professional development in pharmacy</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/33230</link>
      <description>Title: Development of protocols for continuing professional development in pharmacy
Abstract: It has been established that Continuous Professional Development (CPD) is a process which&#xD;
most professionals need to follow to update skills required within the procession they&#xD;
represent. Pharmacists are no exception and the aim of this study was to develop and evaluate&#xD;
CPD record sheets for use by local community pharmacists. These sheets were finalised after&#xD;
a total of 101 cases were managed in a community pharmacy with the help of protocols on&#xD;
allergic skin, nose and eye disease which had been designed in a previous local study. Such&#xD;
protocols outline plans for management of allergic disease symptoms however they were&#xD;
considered to be too long for practical use by pharmacists. Hence before using them to&#xD;
manage cases tor this study the protocols were abridged and later evaluated through a panel&#xD;
of experts consisting of medical and non-medical professionals. Fieldwork entailed&#xD;
documentation of pharmacist intervention when responding to 101 cases of allergic skin,&#xD;
nose and eye conditions identifying compliance with protocols and areas requiring corrective&#xD;
actions. After the first 26 cases were collected, draft CPD record sheets were designed using&#xD;
detailed documentation regarding management of such cases. Such sheets were later used to&#xD;
document the management of the remaining 75 cases collected. Hence the practicality of the&#xD;
sheets was tested and necessary amendments were applied after all cases were collected.&#xD;
Pharmacist intervention was graded according to a pre-established scoring system and guides&#xD;
obtained were also recorded on the CPD record sheets. Difficulties encountered by the&#xD;
pharmacist were outlined on the CPD record sheets together with the respective CPD plan/s&#xD;
chosen. Out of a total of 101 cases collected difficulties were encountered in 37 occasions.&#xD;
Cases with difficulties included 18 skin cases, 12 nose cases and 7 eye cases. Neither of the&#xD;
actions planned by the pharmacist took more than a month to be performed and some actions&#xD;
were performed either on the same day the difficulty was  encountered or the day after. Most&#xD;
actions were performed within a week of the difficulty encountered. All planned actions&#xD;
performed were completed within the established time schedule except one. Also all the&#xD;
actions chosen satisfied the difficulty encountered except two and in both these cases the&#xD;
pharmacist felt that further research would in fact solve the deficiency encountered. This was&#xD;
also recorded on the CPO record sheet. The most popular CPD action plan chosen was&#xD;
research involving related articles on published or online pharmaceutical/medical profession&#xD;
related publications. At the end of the study, an exercise was performed to determine whether&#xD;
CPO actions had any effect on similar cases which presented at the pharmacy after the CPD&#xD;
action was carried out. Analysis of a number of nose and skin cases was carried out since the&#xD;
number of eye cases was too small to offer enough data. Although, a number of similar cases&#xD;
could be identified for nose and skin protocols. no definite results on the impact of CPO&#xD;
actions regarding patient satisfaction could be drawn up since the number of cases collected&#xD;
was still too small for such an analysis. However, as regards confidence in the treatment of&#xD;
cases, it was noticed that the investigator was in fact much more at ease when treating similar&#xD;
cases to those which required a CPO action before. Also the pharmacist took less time to&#xD;
treat such eases and could answer questions poised by patients more fluently. When the need&#xD;
to discuss such cases with professionals of the expert panel arose, the pharmacist would&#xD;
contribute more and understand better the experience and personal opinion offered by the&#xD;
professional.
Description: M.PHIL.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/33230</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cost-effectiveness of drugs which suppress the rheumatic disease process</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32817</link>
      <description>Title: Cost-effectiveness of drugs which suppress the rheumatic disease process
Abstract: Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic, progressive, debilitating, inflammatory disease&#xD;
affecting predominantly the synovial joints of the body. If left unchecked it causes&#xD;
considerable pain, deformity and disability which in turn result in impairment of the&#xD;
psychological and social functioning of the patient. All this imposes an economic&#xD;
burden on the patient as well as on the state.&#xD;
Prior to the 1990s the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis consisted of disease-modifying&#xD;
antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), steroids and analgesics which are not so expensive&#xD;
and did not contribute a large percentage to the overall cost of treating rheumatoid&#xD;
arthritis. More recently tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have been added to the&#xD;
armamentarium of treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. These agents are considerably&#xD;
more expensive than what was available before so this study was undertaken to explore&#xD;
their cost effectiveness ratio.&#xD;
Ten patients who satisfied the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for a&#xD;
diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and who, during the study period, still experienced&#xD;
active joint disease despite full doses of traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic&#xD;
drugs, were commenced on tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapy and formed the&#xD;
basis of this study. In view of the expense of this treatment it was important to&#xD;
demonstrate a beneficial effect both from the physician's perspective as well as from&#xD;
the patient's. Outcome measures were selected to cover both these aspects and&#xD;
consisted of the disease activity score (DAS28) as a predominantly objective marker of&#xD;
disease activity as well as the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and the Short&#xD;
Form -36 (SF36) as subjective markers of functional disability. Statistically significant&#xD;
improvements in all these outcome measures were noted as early as 6 months after the&#xD;
start of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor blocker therapy and this was sustained at the&#xD;
end of 1 year. A statistically significant correlation was also noted between the outcome&#xD;
measures DAS28 and HAQ over time.&#xD;
The pharmacoeconomic analysis was based on calculating the incremental cost&#xD;
effectiveness ratio (lCER) per unit of improvement in the Health Assessment&#xD;
Questionnaire score and per unit of improvement in the disease activity score (DAS28).&#xD;
An incremental cost effectiveness ratio of € 9,523 / unit of Health Assessment&#xD;
Questionnaire and of € 4,427 / unit of DAS28 was obtained taking into consideration&#xD;
direct costs. If indirect costs were to be included in the equation, a more favourable&#xD;
incremental cost effectiveness ratio was obtained: € 3,037 / unit of Health Assessment&#xD;
Questionnaire and of € 1275/ unit ofDAS28 when calculated from the Government's&#xD;
perspective and € 77 / unit of Health Assessment Questionnaire and of € 32 / unit of&#xD;
disease activity score (DAS28) when calculated from the patient's perspective.&#xD;
How cost-effective the tumour necrosis factor inhibitors are will ultimately depend on&#xD;
how much the health care system is prepared to spend to achieve the significant&#xD;
improvement in the outcome measures observed in this study bearing in mind that this&#xD;
improvement may well translate into economic benefits due to reduced loss of work&#xD;
productivity and possibly a reduced need for institutional care. These benefits may&#xD;
offset a significant part of the increased expense of the tumour necrosis factor&#xD;
inhibitors.
Description: M.PHIL.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32817</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

