<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/32998</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 05:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-17T05:45:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>An exploration of social workers’ decision-making processes to remove children from parental care</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/34577</link>
      <description>Title: An exploration of social workers’ decision-making processes to remove children from parental care
Abstract: The aim of this thesis is to explore the decision-making processes involved when child&#xD;
protection services social workers consider the decision to remove children from parental care.&#xD;
It aims to bring to light those factors which distinguish situations where a care order is issued&#xD;
for a child, from those situations where a care order is considered but not issued.&#xD;
The study is a retrospective, qualitative, in-depth, exploratory study, descriptive of the decisionmaking&#xD;
processes involved in the social work decision of removing children from parental care.&#xD;
It originates from a constructivist paradigm, and adopts a relativist ontological positioning and&#xD;
an interpretivist, subjective epistemology. The research design employed is an instrumental,&#xD;
multiple comparative case study design. The context for the research is the child protection&#xD;
services social work team of Aġenzija Appoġġ, the main agency in Malta delivering child and&#xD;
family social work services.&#xD;
Data was collected through accessing the social work files of 30 families who were child&#xD;
protection services users. In 15 of these families social workers’ decision-making processes had&#xD;
resulted in the care order being recommended and issued, and in the other 15 situations the care&#xD;
order had been considered, but was not recommended and issued. A total of 49 children were&#xD;
included in the study, as a number of these families had more than one child.&#xD;
Subsequent to reviewing the social work files of these children, face-to-face semi-structured&#xD;
interviews were conducted with the 15 child protection services social workers (some of whom&#xD;
were responsible for more than one case situation), who had casework responsibility for these&#xD;
49 children during the time the care order was considered, or considered and recommended.&#xD;
Interviews focused on the decision-making processes related to a care order decision or the lack&#xD;
of it, and the factors which they thought had influenced the decision-making processes and the&#xD;
decisions taken. Thematic analysis was employed as a method of analysis in line with the&#xD;
exploratory and descriptive, analytical purposes of the research.&#xD;
Findings indicate that social workers considered the care order decision to be a difficult decision&#xD;
to reach. The decision-making processes involved emerged to be complex ones, and various&#xD;
factors influenced the processes at different stages. Parental characteristics and child&#xD;
characteristics were found to be particularly impactful on whether social workers considered&#xD;
the possibility of a care order to be recommended for a child. On the other hand, the strength of&#xD;
the case and whether the care order was the last resort available to protect a child, were strong&#xD;
influences on whether the care order was recommended and issued. The degree of parental&#xD;
cooperation with social workers turned out to be a primary factor in leading social workers to&#xD;
determine that the care order was the last resort through which a child could be protected.&#xD;
Social workers and characteristics related to their personal values and beliefs, their personality,&#xD;
and their life and work experiences, were found to be influential throughout the care order&#xD;
decision-making processes of the different children. Organisational factors were also found to&#xD;
impact social workers in their decisions. Hence this research study indicated that the child is&#xD;
not always at the centre of the processes involved in care order decision-making. The child’s&#xD;
voice is in competition with a number of other voices, which are often stronger, and at times&#xD;
actually mute the voice of the child.&#xD;
An interesting finding which emerged is what is termed in the thesis as “the care order moment”.&#xD;
The “care order moment” is that decisive moment when there was no turning back from&#xD;
recommending the care order. Triggering factors were found to have led to the care order&#xD;
moment for a notable number of children in the sample. On the other hand, other factors were&#xD;
found to have delayed the care order from being recommended for a number of children.&#xD;
This research study makes recommendations to frontline social workers, social work managers&#xD;
and policy makers to effectively respond to children in need of protection through a continuum&#xD;
of services that will provide social workers with more options through which the interests of&#xD;
children can be served. Child protection services social workers were found to be at the centre&#xD;
of care order decision-making processes, positioned as key protagonists. Hence the study&#xD;
recommendations emphasise the key roles which research, and the ongoing training and&#xD;
supervision of social workers have, in ensuring that the decisions which are taken for children&#xD;
and families are of optimum quality, and that the child is always kept at the centre of decisions&#xD;
taken.
Description: PH.D.SOCIAL WORK</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/34577</guid>
      <dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

