<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/38789</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:13:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-21T02:13:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Disgorgement of profit : a potential remedy for tort victims under Maltese law on damages?</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29472</link>
      <description>Title: Disgorgement of profit : a potential remedy for tort victims under Maltese law on damages?
Abstract: Undoubtedly, the term ‘disgorgement of profit’ is not widely known. Even in those&#xD;
jurisdictions where the remedy, or something similar, has become available, it is often&#xD;
referred to through other, often confusing, names. The remedy of disgorgement of&#xD;
profit seeks to strip a wrongdoer of the profits that one earns from committing a wrong.&#xD;
While it could, theoretically, be made available in various areas of private law, this&#xD;
thesis examines whether a general remedy could be introduced for breaches of tort law.&#xD;
In order to do this, the thesis starts by examining the remedy of disgorgement of profit&#xD;
and proceeds to examining the concept of tort. It had to be determined whether the&#xD;
concept of tort itself excludes, a priori, the remedy of disgorgement of profit. This&#xD;
does not seem to be the case. The thesis goes on to justify, mainly by reference to the&#xD;
theory of corrective justice, that the profits that are stripped from the defendant should&#xD;
be awarded to the plaintiff, thus allowing the Court to order a disgorgement of profit as&#xD;
a remedy for tort.&#xD;
In chapter 3, an analysis is provided of the approach to disgorgement of profit taken by&#xD;
jurisdictions from the Common Law, Civil Law, and Mixed Legal Systems. All the&#xD;
jurisdictions approach the concept differently, but none of them provides a general&#xD;
remedy under the general rules of tort.&#xD;
Following this, an examination of disgorgement of profit as applied in Malta is&#xD;
provided. While the term may be unknown, the remedy has been made available in&#xD;
specific pieces of legislation, especially those relating to intellectual property. This&#xD;
analysis leads to the conclusion that the remedy could be introduced through a proviso&#xD;
to Article 1045 of the Civil Code, thus giving the plaintiff the right to demand a&#xD;
disgorgement of profit where appropriate.
Description: LL.D.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29472</guid>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harmonizing guardianship with interdiction and incapacitation</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29418</link>
      <description>Title: Harmonizing guardianship with interdiction and incapacitation
Abstract: Last September (2016), the fourth World Congress put together a questionnaire&#xD;
tackling adult guardianship. Several countries, including Malta, participated in this&#xD;
survey. The person who tackled such questions on Malta’s behalf was Professor&#xD;
Joseph Cacciottolo – a member of the Guardianship Board. This survey comprised&#xD;
of a number of questions addressing the formalities surrounding legislation which&#xD;
contributes to legal capacity. This questionnaire establishes that currently, in&#xD;
Malta, we have a system which simultaneously applies three statuses, as evident in&#xD;
one of the questions: 2. What are the types of formal measures that exist to support people with&#xD;
disabilities in exercising their legal capacity? (Especially private mandates&#xD;
or legal representatives appointed by a court/authority)&#xD;
Three formal measures exist:&#xD;
A. Interdiction and B. Incapacitation: both are the remit of the Law Courts. C.&#xD;
Guardianship: this is the remit of the national Guardianship Board as appointed by&#xD;
the President of Malta on the advice of a specific Parliamentary Committee.&#xD;
Three statuses currently govern our legal system in terms of lack of capacity -The&#xD;
author will be assessing guardianship’s role so far as well as where it stands&#xD;
currently with interdiction and incapacitation is there a hierarchy?.For purpose of&#xD;
this analysis,the author enlisted,Marylin Spiteri-Guardianship Board ,Dr Ann&#xD;
Marie Mangion and Also The Hon Justyne Caruana ,in order to acquire a better&#xD;
perspective of the current situation.Chapter 1 is an introductory chapter which will&#xD;
focus on guardianship and other legislation dealing with capacity,disability and&#xD;
vaulnerable persons,Chapter 2 will close in on interdiction incapacitation and&#xD;
guardianship,Chapter 3 Is a brief comparative analysis regarding capacity in EU member states and lastly Chapter 4 will look into the effectivity of guardianship&#xD;
law.
Description: LL.B</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29418</guid>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The right to know one’s origins : a study in light of genetic material donation</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29408</link>
      <description>Title: The right to know one’s origins : a study in light of genetic material donation
Abstract: The right to know one’s origins is a topic to be treated with utmost sensitivity as it&#xD;
concerns the individual even prior to conception. Indeed, individuals who were not&#xD;
granted this right at birth grew up to feel prejudiced in various ways. Among the&#xD;
individuals who want to enforce this right are donor-conceived offspring. Albeit a rarity&#xD;
in the past, possibly due to secrecy, the number of donor-conceived children voicing&#xD;
their opinions about their rights is on the increase.&#xD;
The process of assisted reproduction via genetic material donation requires three&#xD;
parties; the intended parents, the donor and the resulting offspring. Being all humans,&#xD;
each have their own interests but unfortunately, the interests of the child were pushed&#xD;
aside since the very beginning. As a result, the right to know one’s origins only emerged&#xD;
when the offspring became adults themselves. Due to the protection of donor&#xD;
anonymity, they embark on a journey to enforce the right to know their origins in their&#xD;
respective countries to be able to obtain information about their genetic makeup.&#xD;
The right to know one’s origins takes on a vast definition as it includes various aspects;&#xD;
biological parents’ identity, family relationships, medical history, self-identity and so on.&#xD;
Therefore, when this right is not granted, the concerned individual loses more than one&#xD;
would think.
Description: LL.B</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29408</guid>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Damages for the wrongful death of a foetus : is such action viable under Maltese Tort Law?</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29404</link>
      <description>Title: Damages for the wrongful death of a foetus : is such action viable under Maltese Tort Law?
Abstract: This research will be dealing with damages in case of wrongful death of a foetus&#xD;
arising out of an unjust act either through dolus or through culpa and whether&#xD;
such action would be viable under Maltese law. It will mainly analyse why&#xD;
damages for the death of a foetus should be awarded under Maltese law&#xD;
withstanding whether it would be feasible for the Maltese Legislator to allow for&#xD;
such damages to be awarded. Currently Maltese Law does not cater for any&#xD;
provisions in the law which deal specifically with such matter. Maltese&#xD;
Legislation under the Law of Tort makes use of the word ‘person’ which brings&#xD;
about the debatable argument whether a foetus could possibly constitute a&#xD;
person or not. From this point of view, this research will shift attention to a&#xD;
philosophical argument , as to whether a foetus is to be considered as a person&#xD;
and if it is, when is it to be considered so. This study will hopefully bring this&#xD;
matter into the light for further contribution and perspective, so maybe&#xD;
necessary measures will be taken in the right direction towards a clearer&#xD;
legislation on the damages for the wrongful death of a foetus. There are several&#xD;
to and fro arguments regarding this subject, however it has never come to a&#xD;
concrete conclusion, and for the most part it has been disregarded and left up to&#xD;
the discretion of the Judges.
Description: LL.B</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29404</guid>
      <dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

