<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/63336</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 13:18:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-25T13:18:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Addressing quality improvement in community speech-language clinics.</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/47835</link>
      <description>Title: Addressing quality improvement in community speech-language clinics.
Abstract: Purpose of the study&#xD;
The local health Authorities and in general the administration of Health provision in&#xD;
Malta envisage the importance of the development of adequate mechanisms to&#xD;
monitor and audit services provided (Azzopardi-Muscat, 1999). Being part of the&#xD;
Health Department, the Speech Language Department (SLD) needs to adhere to these&#xD;
policies too.&#xD;
The aim of this research is to study the perceptions about aspects of quality from the&#xD;
customers (patients/carers) point of view, Speech Language Pathologists (SLPs) and&#xD;
Management of the SLD and provide recommendations for the development of&#xD;
quality assurance within the community Speech Language Services.&#xD;
Background&#xD;
Donabedian (1980) explained that in Health Services the interaction of service users&#xD;
and providers highlighted the importance of: Accessibility, Inter-personal interaction,&#xD;
technical management and continuity, these are further divided into structure, process&#xD;
and outcome.&#xD;
&#xD;
Research Questions&#xD;
The following questions were investigated&#xD;
+:+ What is the current status of performance and how could this, through quality&#xD;
assurance, lead to a more effective and efficient service?&#xD;
+:+ Which are the important standards for Speech and language serVIces in the&#xD;
community to develop quality improvement?&#xD;
Data was collected by diverse qualitative research techniques (by triangulation).&#xD;
Semi-structured interviews were carried out with personnel in administration of the&#xD;
SLD and 16 service users whilst 3 focus groups carried out with 15 SLPs.&#xD;
Analysis&#xD;
The 3 categories of participants defmed quality in various ways, for clients quality&#xD;
meant: professionals provide services and their condition improved. Staff saw quality&#xD;
as having standards which are followed resulting in satisfied clients. Management&#xD;
considered the availability of resources which are used in an efficient and effective&#xD;
way for client satisfaction.&#xD;
Accessibility: Clients consider physical and geographic accessibility and flexibility of&#xD;
appointments important whilst staff and management consider communication and the&#xD;
environment as facilitating accessibility. Conflicting views emerged on initial&#xD;
appointments and opening hours although satisfaction was expressed together with&#xD;
possible unexpressed dissatisfaction due to missed appointments. In technical&#xD;
Management it was indicated that there were insufficient premises with poor&#xD;
environmental conditions in some places. Staff claimed the need for continuous&#xD;
&#xD;
professional development. Unawareness of the Quality Service Charter by service&#xD;
users was evident, they expressed satisfaction and refrained from placing complaints.&#xD;
For the interpersonal process, Management asked for respect from authorities, staff&#xD;
wanted more manageable caseloads and users requested more involvement.&#xD;
Participants expressed the need for a complaints system and other policies.&#xD;
Continuity was reported to be maintained by a primary service provider system and&#xD;
users recognized service as important and recommendable. Missed appointments&#xD;
were considered by management and staff as a major deterrent to continuity and waste&#xD;
of resources.&#xD;
Conclusions and recommendations&#xD;
Implications for management are that: the QSC needs to be re-evaluated and&#xD;
developed further to satisfy basic requirements. Policies need to be developed to&#xD;
regulate aspects of service deliver and clinical practice. These include policies on&#xD;
admissions and discharge, staff monitoring, and continuous professional development.&#xD;
The setting up of a Structural Changes Steering and Action Committee is&#xD;
recommended to take responsibility of the problems related to structural issues.&#xD;
Setting up of a customer care unit involved in developing and carrying out internal&#xD;
and external customer satisfaction monitoring.&#xD;
MSc. Health Services Management&#xD;
August 2003&#xD;
Key words: Perceptions of quality Community Speech Language Services&#xD;
Quality improvement/assurance
Description: M.SC.HEALTH SERVICES MANGT.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/47835</guid>
      <dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Developing a quality service charter for the radiology department.</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45277</link>
      <description>Title: Developing a quality service charter for the radiology department.
Abstract: This research was designed to gather consumers' opinions together with&#xD;
providers' views regarding the services provided by the Radiology Department.&#xD;
Obtaining such information is the first step towards the development of a Quality&#xD;
Service Charter. A Quality Service Charter is an organisation's written&#xD;
commitment of a quality service to its customers. Quality Service Charters thus&#xD;
ensure that a culture of public accountability is in place in the organisation. As yet,&#xD;
no such charter for the Radiology Department at St. Luke's Hospital, Malta,&#xD;
exists.&#xD;
This study was conducted using a patient satisfaction survey, personal interviews&#xD;
with referring clinicians, a focus group interview with Radiology Department staff,&#xD;
and interviews with the manager and the director of the department.&#xD;
The results demonstrated that patients are generally highly satisfied with the&#xD;
services provided by the department, except for the issues of waiting time and&#xD;
waiting lists. Referring clinicians tend to be less satisfied, the main reason given&#xD;
being the inadequate quality of reporting. Radiology Department staff&#xD;
acknowledge that problems with customers exist but do not feel empowered to&#xD;
introduce any effective changes to improve the service quality.&#xD;
These results are comparable to similar findings presented in the literature&#xD;
review. The main recommendations based on the findings propose organisational&#xD;
changes that need to be introduced in the department before the implementation&#xD;
of a Quality Service Charter.
Description: M.SC.HEALTH SERVICES MANGT.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45277</guid>
      <dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The feasibility of introducing user charges at Zammit Clapp Hospital.</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45187</link>
      <description>Title: The feasibility of introducing user charges at Zammit Clapp Hospital.
Abstract: Economic, demographic and technological pressures have led to increased&#xD;
demands upon health services and the need to contain spending on healthcare.&#xD;
Like other developed countries, Malta is facing pressures of sustaining&#xD;
escalating healthcare costs. The purpose of this management project was to&#xD;
explore the perspectives of stakeholders regarding the concept of charging users&#xD;
for public healthcare services and the feasibility of introducing user charges for&#xD;
services provided to inpatients at Zammit Clapp Hospital (ZCH).&#xD;
A combination of qualitative and quantitative methods was utilised. Interviews&#xD;
were carried out with a representative of a non-governmental organisation and&#xD;
six key informants at corporate level in the fields of health policy, social&#xD;
servIces, finance, economics, and hospital management. Structured&#xD;
questionnaires were collected throughout March 2003 from 106 in-patients&#xD;
(n=139) and from 101 of their informal carers who were recruited on informed&#xD;
consent and set inclusion criteria. Patients and carers were asked about charging&#xD;
users for public healthcare services; the willingness to pay part of the cost&#xD;
incurred by ZCH to provide services and knowledge of the daily cost of care.&#xD;
67% of patients, 58% of their informal carers and all key informants agreed&#xD;
with the concept of paying user charges for public healthcare services.&#xD;
Although 75% of patients and 77% of carers were willing to pay part of the&#xD;
costs of services provided at ZCH, a much lower ability to pay resulted. More&#xD;
than 92% of patients and their carers lacked knowledge of the daily cost of&#xD;
inpatient care. According to interviewees, the current system of funding&#xD;
healthcare was insufficient or created excess demand that would be better&#xD;
rationed if a price were charged. Income-related charges were considered&#xD;
acceptable for most healthcare services. Findings also indicated that the system&#xD;
that would introduce user charges for public healthcare services would have to&#xD;
follow a top-down approach directed by government since it entailed&#xD;
restructuring of the system financing healthcare. As a public hospital, ZCH&#xD;
would therefore have to follow decisions taken centrally related to charging&#xD;
users for services provided. Among options of user charges considered,&#xD;
introducing a charge per bed night for the package of care provided was&#xD;
recommended as the most feasible to implement because of its potential of&#xD;
generating revenue and since it supported equity principles by exempting&#xD;
patients eligible to Free Medical Aid. Preserving social solidarity in terms of&#xD;
equity of access was considered fundamental to the reform process that would&#xD;
introduce user charges for public healthcare services in Malta.
Description: M.SC.HEALTH SERVICES MANGT.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45187</guid>
      <dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A study of the requirements for setting up a quality system at a public health microbiology laboratory.</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45069</link>
      <description>Title: A study of the requirements for setting up a quality system at a public health microbiology laboratory.
Abstract: For a laboratory to be in a position to apply for accreditation, it must develop,&#xD;
implement and maintain a quality system in conformity with the pertinent standard.&#xD;
Most accreditation bodies around the world including the local National Accreditation&#xD;
Body, NAB-MSA, are assessing laboratories seeking accreditation against the&#xD;
requirements stipulated in the international standard ISO/IEe 17025 (1999), also&#xD;
known as ISO 17025.&#xD;
The Public Health Microbiology Laboratory (PHML) was primarily chosen as the&#xD;
subject of this research because of the need for this laboratory to demonstrate&#xD;
competence through accreditation particularly in view of its important role in food&#xD;
control and monitoring of water quality in the Maltese Islands. In addition, it has been&#xD;
proposed by the Government of Malta as the laboratory which should aim for&#xD;
accreditation of its microbiological testing services so as to be recognised as an&#xD;
official food control laboratory once Malta joins the European Union.&#xD;
The PHML laboratory practices were evaluated against the ISO 17025 requirements&#xD;
as at the end of December 2001 and a gap analysis was produced. The evaluation and&#xD;
the gap analysis revealed that the PHML complied with 26% of the standard's&#xD;
requirements, partially complied with 33% and did not comply with 31%. The&#xD;
majority of the partial and non-compliances consisted of the lack of quality system&#xD;
documentation. The remaining 10% of the ISO 17025 requirements were not&#xD;
applicable to the PHML. The actions to be taken by the PHML in order to conform to&#xD;
this standard were subsequently identified and listed. Furthermore, the quality&#xD;
manual, the main document describing the quality system, as well as a number of&#xD;
support quality system documents, i.e. procedures, work instructions and record&#xD;
sheets were developed and documented.&#xD;
It was concluded that according to the findings made until the end of December 2001,&#xD;
a significant number of actions are to be addressed and implemented for the PHML to&#xD;
set up a quality system conforming to ISO 17025 and eventually apply for&#xD;
accreditation. The compiled list of actions and the recommendations forwarded may&#xD;
be used by the management of the PHML as a basis for drawing up an achievable plan&#xD;
of action. In addition, the documentation produced may be integrated with the quality&#xD;
system documents already employed at the PHML and may serve as examples for the&#xD;
other documents to be prepared.
Description: M.SC.HEALTH SERVICES MANGT.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/45069</guid>
      <dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

