<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OAR@UM Collection:</title>
    <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/7985</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 14:47:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-18T14:47:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cetaceans and their interactions with coastal fisheries in the Gulf of Kavala, Eastern Mediterranean sea</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/100882</link>
      <description>Title: Cetaceans and their interactions with coastal fisheries in the Gulf of Kavala, Eastern Mediterranean sea
Abstract: Cetacears in the Gulf of Kavala and around Thassos, in the Thracian Sea, were studied as this&#xD;
site has been proposed as a potential cetacean conservation area by ACCOBAMS (Agreement&#xD;
on the Conservation of Cetaceans in the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and Contiguous Atlantic&#xD;
Area. This area is also an important Greek fishing ground, so cetacean-fisheries associations&#xD;
were srtuctured to understand the extent of the reciprocal negative impacts between the two. The&#xD;
research investigated) cetacean abundance and distribution in the study area of the Gulf of&#xD;
Kavala; b) cetacean strandings in the North Aegean Sea and stomach content diet analysis; c)&#xD;
survey of the fisheries catch per gear used in the Thracian Sea and analyses of the extent of&#xD;
fisheries target species overlap with cetacean prey species found through cetacean diet analyses,&#xD;
and J) fishermen questionnaire study on fisheries-cetacean interaction and sightings of&#xD;
cetaceans during fishing activities.&#xD;
Regarding the first task, the presence, abundance and distribution of cetacean species in the&#xD;
study area were investigated between 2005 and 2013 through dedicated scientific marine&#xD;
surveys. Data were collected during a total boat survey effort covering 14,701 km in sea&#xD;
conditions &lt;Beaufort 4, in a study area of 2000 km2&#xD;
• The survey used the line-transect sampling&#xD;
method to estimate relative abundance, calculated using Distance software 6.0. Six cetacean&#xD;
species v-ere recorded in the study area, estimated at a total of 5,069 individuals (95% C.I. =&#xD;
3,668 - 7,004; CV = 16.56). Abundance estimates were obtained for bottlenose dolphins&#xD;
(Tursiops truncatus) (2,934 individuals; 95% C.I. = 1,915 - 4,494; CV= 21.91); and common&#xD;
dolphins! Delphinus de/phis) (1,482 individuals; 95% C.I. = 958 -2,295; CV= 22.55). Dolphin&#xD;
sightings were correlated to eight environmental variables using GAM and PCA. Bottlenose&#xD;
dolphins sightings were found to correlate with depth (p = 0.007) and median temperature (p =&#xD;
0.042). Common dolphin sightings correlated with depth (p = 0.035), temperature (p = 0.022 for&#xD;
median temperature and p = 0.001 for temperature gradient) and salinity (p = 0.001 for median&#xD;
salinity and p = 0.024 for salinity gradient). Apart from, these two species, other visiting&#xD;
cetacean species include: striped dolphins (Stenella coeruleoalba), harbour porpoises (Phocoena&#xD;
phocoena) and Risso's dolphins (Grampus griseus). The Mysticete fin whale (Balaenoptera&#xD;
physalus) and the pinniped Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus) were rarely&#xD;
sighted.&#xD;
Cetacean strandings were recorded and allowed for stomach-content analyses performed on 26&#xD;
suitable specimen samples. Results from the stomach-content analyses showed that: common&#xD;
dolphins (N = 8) fed mainly on species from the Clupeidae and Myctophidae families and a few&#xD;
cephalopods, bottlenose dolphin (N = 8) fed primarily on snake blenny (Ophidion carbatum),&#xD;
bogue (Boops hoops), species of the Clupeidae family and cephalopods, such as squids of the&#xD;
genus Loligo. Striped dolphins (N = 4) fed on small pelagic fish, such as bogue and especially&#xD;
on Myctophidae, such as Madeira lantern fish (Ceratoscopelus maderensis) and in a smaller&#xD;
proportion on cephalopods. Harbour porpoises (N = 6) fed on fish, with a high preference for&#xD;
species of the Gobiidae family followed by Clupeidae. This present work also contributes first&#xD;
data on harbour porpoises' diet in the Mediterranean Sea. Risso's dolphins (N = 1) fed&#xD;
exclusively on cephalopods, prevalently species from the Teuthida order, and the genus&#xD;
Histiotheutis. In none of the cetacean stomachs investigated, was there a dominant presence of&#xD;
important commercial fisheries species. Trophic levels of the cetacean species were calculated&#xD;
and in all cases showed values higher than 4, indicating a top predator position in the food web;&#xD;
their values ranged from 4.22 for harbour porpoises to 4. 70 for Risso' s dolphins. [...]
Description: PHD</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/100882</guid>
      <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Species richness and metacommunity dynamics in bryophytes</title>
      <link>https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/8024</link>
      <description>Title: Species richness and metacommunity dynamics in bryophytes
Abstract: Bryophyte species richness and composition were analysed on limestone boulder habitats&#xD;
across twenty sites in Malta. These boulders acted as standard units for studying the effect&#xD;
of environmental, microtopographical and spatial factors on bryophyte metacommunities.&#xD;
The results indicated that bryophyte species richness on boulders was not significantly&#xD;
affected by environmental and spatial parameters. In fact the variability of within-site&#xD;
species composition was comparable to across-site variability, and spatial separation had&#xD;
a negligible effect on differences in species richness (p=0.04, R2=0.05) between sites. This&#xD;
result along with the fact that 78.1% of the thirty-two bryophyte species sampled showed&#xD;
no significant preference between boulders and the surrounding soil matrix suggest that&#xD;
the composition of local bryophyte communities was not limited by dispersal between&#xD;
boulders. Instead, environmental and spatial parameters were more likely to influence the&#xD;
occurrence of particular bryophyte species on limestone boulders. The same could not be&#xD;
said for microtopographical parameters, which were found to significantly contribute to&#xD;
variation in bryophyte species richness and composition. This result confirms previous&#xD;
remarks about aspect and slope being the most ecologically meaningful predictors of&#xD;
bryophyte species composition on boulders (Vitt, Li &amp; Belland 1995; Spitale &amp;&#xD;
Nascimbene, 2012). Such parameters were more important than general environmental&#xD;
conditions within a site, because they control micro-fluctuations in light and moisture&#xD;
conditions and consequently govern the physiological adaptations of bryophyte&#xD;
communities. Species richness also showed a positive and significant relationship&#xD;
(p&lt;0.01, exp(B)=1.39) with standardised boulder surface area, confirming the area&#xD;
predictions of island biogeography theory. From the four metacommunity perspectives&#xD;
(Leibold et al., 2004), only the neutral paradigm was not observed. This suggested that an&#xD;
amalgamation of metacommunity paradigms govern bryophyte species composition on&#xD;
local limestone boulders, with the order of colonisation, extinction and interspecific&#xD;
competition having a significant role in shaping such communities.
Description: M.SC.BIOLOGY</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/8024</guid>
      <dc:date>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

