Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/2143
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-06T09:44:40Z
dc.date.available2015-04-06T09:44:40Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/2143
dc.descriptionLL.D.
dc.description.abstractUnder Maltese corporate law, an ailing company unable to pay its debts and settle its financial obligations is, broadly speaking, faced with two paths: dissolution and winding-up, or in certain cases, recovery and rescue. Both routes depart from the same point, but goad the company to two polar destinations. The corporate rescue culture has long been in existence away from Malta’s shores, namely in the United Kingdom, where it has undergone significant and extensive legislative amendment and judicial interpretation. Malta’s experience is somewhat less colourful and rich: the company recovery procedure in Article 329B was inserted into the Maltese Companies Act in 2003, and to date, has only been judicially invoked five times. Can one deem that the corporate rescue culture has taken root in Malta? Primarily, this thesis seeks to analyse Article 329B in light of the courts’ interpretation thereof. The legal provision itself is scrutinised and dissected in an attempt to establish whether the courts abided by the law word-for-word or whether there emerge any other criteria or ‘tests’ which the judiciary applied in the five applications for company recovery which have been presented before them over the last eleven years. On a secondary and purely legislative level, a comparative analysis is made with the United Kingdom and to a lesser extent, Australia and Hong Kong to highlight any similarities and differences which may exist between these foreign jurisdictions and Malta. The judiciary’s interpretation of a particular legal provision sheds invaluable light on its true meaning and implementation. Through the appraisal herein of the courts’ analysis of Article 329B it is hoped that clarification is bestowed on the practical implementation and utilisation of this seldom used provision which may, if invoked, contribute towards the rescue and recovery of an insolvent company, having significant financial repercussions on interested parties.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectCorporation law -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectCorporate reorganizations -- Law and legislation -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectBankruptcyen_GB
dc.subjectComparative lawen_GB
dc.titleAn appraisal of the Maltese Courts’ interpretation of the company recovery procedureen_GB
dc.typemasterThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Laws. Department of Commercial Lawen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorJaccarini, Nicola
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 2014
Dissertations - FacLawCom - 2014

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
14LLD075.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.