Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Rating vs. preference : a comparative study of self-reporting
Authors: Yannakakis, Georgios N.
Hallam, John
Keywords: Computer games
Human-computer interaction
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: Springer
Citation: Yannakakis, G. N., & Hallam, J., (2011). Rating vs. preference : a comparative study of self-reporting. International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, Memphis.
Abstract: This paper introduces a comparative analysis between rating and pairwise self-reporting via questionnaires in user survey experiments. Two dissimilar game user survey experiments are employed in which the two questionnaire schemes are tested and compared for reliable affect annotation. The statistical analysis followed to test our hypotheses shows that even though the two self-reporting schemes are consistent there are significant order of reporting effects when subjects report via a rating questionnaire. The paper concludes with a discussion of the appropriateness of each self-reporting scheme under conditions drawn from the experimental results obtained.
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - InsDG

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Erratum_Ranking_vs_Preference_A_Comparative_Study_.pdf182.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.