Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28569
Title: Redefining logical constants as inference markers
Authors: Frapolli, Maria Jose
Assimakopoulos, Stavros
Keywords: Pragmatism
Expressivism (Ethics)
Issue Date: 2012
Publisher: De Gruyter
Citation: Frápolli, M. J., & Assimakopoulos, S. (2012). Redefining logical constants as inference markers. The Linguistic Review, 29(4), 625-642.
Abstract: There is currently no universally accepted general de nition of logical constanthood. With a view to addressing this issue, we follow a pragmatist ratio- nale, according to which, some notion can be identi ed as a logical constant by considering the way in which it is used in our everyday reasoning practices, and argue that a logical constant has to be seen as encoding some kind of dynamic meaning, which marks the presence of an inferential transition among proposi- tional contents. We then put forth a characterisation of logical constants that takes into account their syntactic, semantic and pragmatic roles. What follows from our proposal is that logical constanthood can be best understood as a func- tional property that is satis ed only by certain uses of the relevant notions.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/28569
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - InsLin

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2012. Redefining logical constants as inference markers.pdf1.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.