Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/29035
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-11T10:22:26Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-11T10:22:26Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/29035-
dc.descriptionLL.Ben_GB
dc.description.abstractThe first chapter of this study will seek to examine and discuss general concepts which are embedded within the general provisions of law, yet the law never attempts to define such concepts, which in reality have been troubling the curious minded since the creation of the so-called ‘society’. Consequently, to further shed light on the matter, these concepts will be analysed from a philosophical perspective with particular focus on theories proposed by various philosophers. The second chapter of this study will then seek to analyse Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and Article 9 of the Maltese Competition Act (CA) by first discussing the context within which the mentioned provisions exist; that of competition law. After discussing the context, meaning and the involved core principles, this section will then seek to analyse Article 102 of the TFEU and the concept of the ‘abuse of a dominant position’, whilst also placing particular focus on the notions of ‘refusal to supply’ and the ‘essential facilities doctrine’. Additionally, a comparative exercise will also be undertaken throughout this chapter by analysing the manner in which particular jurisdictions have interpreted Art.102 of the TFEU and its principles. After having analysed the classical philosophical concepts in the first chapter and after discussing the core concepts and objectives of competition and the notion of ‘abuse of a dominant position’ in the second chapter, the third chapter of this study will first begin by attempting to link the philosophical theories and concepts with today’s contemporary legal system, particularly focusing on bringing these concepts within the realm of Competition Law to bridge the gap between classical thought and modern legal evolution. Additionally, this chapter will seek to determine how relevant and applicable, if any, do the classical concepts remain, particularly within the competitive scenario.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectRestraint of trade -- European Union countriesen_GB
dc.subjectMonopolies -- European Union countriesen_GB
dc.subjectAntitrust law -- European Union countriesen_GB
dc.subjectAntitrust law -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titleA philosophical : legal analysis of Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 9 of the Maltese Competition Acten_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Lawsen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorMeli, Brandon-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 2017
Dissertations - FacLawCom - 2017

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
17LLB083.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.