Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.identifier.citationDawsey, J. M. (1991). Was Ur-Markus the source for Lk. 19-15 : 20:47? Melita Theologica, 42(2), 95-110.en_GB
dc.description.abstractThere is a growing consensus that the literary relationship of Luke to the other gospels is more complicated than previously thought. This was clearly evidenced by the Trinity College Colloquy of 1977 which first brought into focus the discontent that exists with the so-called two document, and Griesbach hypotheses. Now, a decade later, there is widespread unease among New Testament scholars with the accepted theories explaining the literary relation- ship of Matthew, Mark, and Luke.en_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Malta. Faculty of Theologyen_GB
dc.subjectBible. Luke -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.en_GB
dc.subjectBible. Luke -- Commentariesen_GB
dc.subjectReligious literature -- History and criticismen_GB
dc.titleWas Ur-Markus the source for Lk. 19-15 : 20:47?en_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publication.titleMelita Theologicaen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorDawsey, James M.-
Appears in Collections:MT - Volume 42, Issue 2 - 1991
MT - Volume 42, Issue 2 - 1991

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MT,_42(2)_-_A2.pdf814.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.