Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Passive inhalation of cannabis smoke : a novel defence strategy?
Authors: Busuttil, Anthony
Obafunwa, John
Bulgin, S.
Keywords: Marijuana -- Law and legislation -- Case studies
Drug abuse and crime -- Law and legislation -- Case studies
Passive smoking -- Law and legislation
Issue Date: 1996-06
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Busuttil, A., Obafunwa, J., & Bulgin, S. (1996). Passive inhalation of cannabis smoke : a novel defence strategy? Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 3(2), 99-104.
Abstract: Defence lawyers sometimes argue that the presence of cannabinoid metabolites in the defendant's blood or urine resulted from passive unintentional inhalation of environmental cannabis smoke. It would be useful to be able to differentiate passive inhalation from active use so as to discourage the potential abuse of this phenomenon by the defence. Four cases from two jurisdictions in which passive cannabis smoking was used as a defence are presented to illustrate this dilemma. It remains impossible to define objectively an upper limit for blood and urine levels in cases of passive inhalation of cannabis from the environment. However, a claim of passive inhalation, or indeed ‘deliberate passive exposure’ could be discouraged by making it an offence to place oneself in a position of being ‘concerned’ in the use of the drug. The onus should be on the defendant to prove that he had not attempted to extricate himself from the situation, being aware of the smoking of cannabis in his immediate vicinity; ignorance would not be an excuse.
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - ERCMedGen

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Passive inhalation of cannabis smoke.PDF788.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.