Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/5805
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-26T15:45:45Z-
dc.date.available2015-10-26T15:45:45Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/5805-
dc.descriptionB.A.(HONS)GEOGRAPHYen_GB
dc.description.abstractOver the last two decades a substantial amount of literature has been written on sustainable agriculture emanating from the discovery that mainstream, conventional agriculture is facing numerous constraints, mainly due to its intensification. The Maltese Agricultural sector is no exception – The Environment Report (MEPA, 2008) identifies agriculture, together with land development, “as the principle anthropogenic pressures in countryside areas”. Recognising such an adverse impact of agricultural intensification on the environment, many alternatives to this traditional form of agriculture have been proposed as a way of achieving sustainable agriculture. Permaculture is a case in point. It “involves the design of sustainable agricultural systems and human habitats that mimic the patterns and relationships found in natural ecologies.” (McManus, 2010) This dissertation is a comparative analysis between two agricultural systems: a conventional system and a permaculture system situated at Marsaskala, in the South East of Malta. The scope of such study is to investigate which of these two agronomic production systems is closer to the ideal concept of sustainable agriculture. This was done by selecting an indicator for each of the three pillars of sustainable agriculture, i.e. the economic, environmental and social dimension. In order to assess environmental sustainability of the two systems, topsoil organic carbon was chosen, as it is the best indicator for soil quality. Topsoil organic carbon content was found using the Walkley and Black Method, at the Għammieri Laboratories. In terms of economic sustainability, the potential profit per unit of agricultural land from the two systems was compared while for social sustainability, the type of pesticides applied should the common pest Tuta absoluta invade tomatoes was investigated. Hence this is a predominantly qualitative study with some quantitative analysis. The latter two indicators were investigated through semi-structured interviews to the producers concerned coupled with field observation.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectSustainable agriculture -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectPermaculture -- Maltaen_GB
dc.subjectOrganic farming -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titlePermaculture and conventional agriculture : a comparative analysisen_GB
dc.typebachelorThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Arts. Department of Geographyen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorMizzi, Denise (2012)-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacArt - 2012
Dissertations - FacArtGeo - 2012

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
12BAGE014.pdf
  Restricted Access
10.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.