Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBriguglio, Lino-
dc.contributor.authorCordina, Gordon-
dc.contributor.authorVella, Stephanie-
dc.contributor.authorVigilance, Constance-
dc.identifier.citationBriguglio, L., Cordina, G., Vella, S., & Vigilance, C. (2010). Chapter 2 : updating and augmenting the economic vulnerability index. In: L. Briguglio, G. Cordina, S. Vella, & C. Vigilance (Eds.), Profiling vulnerability and resilience : a manual for small states. Msida: University of Malta. Islands and Small States Institute & London: The Commonwealth Secretariat. 5-15.en_GB
dc.description.abstractThe economic vulnerability index (EVI) was initially developed by Briguglio (1992, 1993, 1995) to explain the seeming contradiction that a country can be economically vulnerable and yet register a relatively high GDP per capita. Many versions of the index were produced following Briguglio's work, including Chander (1996), Wells (1997), Atkins et al. (1998, 2001) and Crowards (1999). The general conclusion that emerged from these studies is that small island developing states tend to be more economically vulnerable than other groups of countries. The characteristics of small island developing states (SIDS) are well documented (see for example, Briguglio, 199 5 ), and include limited ability to exploit economies of scale; lack of natural resource endowments and a high import content (especially of strategic imports such as food and fuel). Other characteristics relate to limitations of production diversification possibilities; dependence on a narrow range of exports; limitations on the extent to which domestic competition policy can be applied; inability to influence international prices; and, in the case of island states, high international transport costs and uncertainties of industrial supplies due to insularity and remoteness. Small size also creates problems associated with public administration, the most important of which is probably the small manpower resource base from which to draw experienced and efficient administrators. Another problem is that many government functions tend to be very expensive per capita when the population is small, due to the fact that certain expenses are not divisible in proportion to the number of users.en_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Malta. Islands and Small States Institute & The Commonwealth Secretariaten_GB
dc.subjectEconomic policy -- Evaluationen_GB
dc.subjectEconomic securityen_GB
dc.subjectEconomic stabilizationen_GB
dc.subjectEconomic policy -- Researchen_GB
dc.subjectGross domestic producten_GB
dc.titleChapter 2 : updating and augmenting the economic vulnerability indexen_GB
dc.title.alternativeProfiling vulnerability and resilience : a manual for small statesen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
Appears in Collections:Profiling vulnerability and resilience : a manual for small states

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chapter_2_Updating_and_augmenting.pdf784.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.