Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/6880
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-10T15:57:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-12-10T15:57:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/6880 | |
dc.description | B.ED.(HONS) | en_GB |
dc.description.abstract | 'Classroom discourse' is a term used to refer to the language that the teachers and students use in the classroom as they interact with each other. In this study, we wanted to gain a better insight of the kind of classroom discourse occurring during Maltese Physics secondary classrooms. Importance was given to the concept of the 'communicative approach' developed by Mortimer and Scott (2003), which provides an insight on how teachers work to develop ideas throughout the science lesson. These identified discourse used by the science teacher as being (i) interactive or non-interactive and (ii) dialogic or authoritative. The first dimension takes into account the level of student participation while the second dimension takes into account whether teachers make use of students' ideas, even when not based on scientific facts. In this study we conducted a qualitative and quantitative analysis. In order to carry out the study, we recorded and observed fourteen Physics lessons presented by fourteen different teachers, ranging from Form 3 to Form 5. The same fourteen teachers were interviewed and one-hundred-and-eighty-eight questionnaires were distributed to the students observed. This allowed us to generate data about classroom discourse in Maltese secondary schools. It was concluded that, for this sample of teachers, they mainly initiated talk through questions which only required a one- or two-word answer in a short period of time. Also, teachers mainly used authoritative/interactive and authoritative/non-interactive discourse as their main communicative approach. On the other hand, dialogic discourse was scarcely used by Maltese Physics teachers. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | en_GB |
dc.subject | Language and education -- Malta | en_GB |
dc.subject | Discourse analysis | en_GB |
dc.subject | Interaction analysis in education -- Malta | en_GB |
dc.subject | Physics -- Study and teaching (Secondary) -- Malta | en_GB |
dc.title | Discourse in secondary physics classrooms | en_GB |
dc.type | bachelorThesis | en_GB |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder. | en_GB |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Malta | en_GB |
dc.publisher.department | Faculty of Education | en_GB |
dc.description.reviewed | N/A | en_GB |
dc.contributor.creator | Farrugia, Yanica | |
dc.contributor.creator | Muscat, Claudine | |
Appears in Collections: | Dissertations - FacEdu - 2012 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
12BED069.pdf Restricted Access | 4.39 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.