Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/70972
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThomson, Richard M.-
dc.contributor.authorAzzopardi, Ernest A.-
dc.contributor.authorDrake, David J.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-10T16:29:58Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-10T16:29:58Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationThomson, R. M., Azzopardi, E., & Drake, D. (2020). Validating the Asher-McDade score to assess facial aesthetic outcomes in 22 consecutive complete bilateral cleft lip repairs. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. In pressen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/70972-
dc.description.abstractMost scoring systems used to assess facial aesthetics in cleft patients tend to lack consistency, and the absence of an internationally agreed system makes comparison challenging. The most widely used and validated tool is the five-point Asher-McDade index. We note that there are currently no reports (to our knowledge) of its use for scoring outcomes after bilateral cleft lip repair. To validate it for this use, the aim was to describe the outcomes of 22 consecutive bilateral cleft lip repairs assessed using this scale. A retrospective review was undertaken of 22 consecutive patients with bilateral cleft lip repairs performed at our centre. Each patient underwent bilateral advancement rotation repair with a vomer flap on one side at three months followed by repair of the remaining hard palate and an intravelar veloplasty three months later. Standardised photographs were taken five years after repair and were cropped to isolate the nasolabial component. Eleven members of the cleft multidisciplinary team were asked to rate each image on a five-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA test and intraclass correlation coefficient to interrogate intraobserver and interobserver variance. A total of 22 consecutive patients with complete bilateral cleft lips were photographed. The overall mean (range) score for the repairs was 3.2 (4.3 - 1.8). Two-way ANOVA demonstrated that inter-rater variability accounted for just over 10% (11.23% of the total variance, p < 0.0001). As predicted, the single biggest factor affecting score variability was the patient’s appearance, which accounted for 44.51% of the total variance between scores (p < 0.0001). Intraobserver variance was not found to be significant, accounting for 0.33% of the total variance (p = 0.0006). We demonstrate that the Asher-McDade scoring system is a valid tool to use when assessing bilateral cleft lip repairs. Variance in the patient’s score was significantly related to a true difference in appearance, with only a small percentage of differences being due to intraobserver and interobserver variation.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstoneen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectCleft lip -- Surgeryen_GB
dc.subjectReconstructive surgical proceduresen_GB
dc.subjectOral surgical proceduresen_GB
dc.subjectAestheticsen_GB
dc.titleValidating the Asher-McDade score to assess facial aesthetic outcomes in 22 consecutive complete bilateral cleft lip repairsen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.09.001-
dc.publication.titleBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SAna

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S026643562030509X-main.pdf
  Restricted Access
710.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.