Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/71000
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAzzopardi, Ernest A.-
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Robert T.-
dc.contributor.authorKearns, Mollie-
dc.contributor.authorMarangoni, Francesco-
dc.contributor.authorIbrahim, Nader-
dc.contributor.authorBoyce, Dean-
dc.contributor.authorTretti Clementoni, Matteo-
dc.contributor.authorMurison, Maxwell-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-11T08:00:14Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-11T08:00:14Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationAzzopardi, E. A., Duncan, R. T., Kearns, M., Marangoni, F., Ibrahim, N., Azzopardi, E. A., ... & Mursion, M. S. (2020). Cutaneous laser surgery for secondary burn reconstruction: Cost benefit analysis. Burns, 46(3), 561-566.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/71000-
dc.description.abstractThermal disease presents a major burden to individual patient morbidity, healthcare cost as well as to over all economy. Burns also also represent a significant per-patient utlilisation of finitehealthcare resources. Secondary complications inthesepatients, suchasmultiple drug resistant organisms, may have a devastating effect. Laser surgeryhas recently come of age as anoptimaltoolinthe secondary reconstructionof burn injury, that is able to simultaneously address significant sheet scar tightness, hypertrophic, atrophic, and keloid complications, pruritus, microstomia, ectropion, skin graft honeycombing, andimproverangeofmovementwhilst reducingtheriskofinfectionto<1%.Yet, cutaneous laser surgery is often underutilised due to the perceived concerns about the sustainability of a new service with relatively high startup cost. We present a dual methodology to explore this concern: an evidence-based background review of the last 5 years of current best evidence, and a 22-year cost-analysis comparison at an established, high volume UK Centre of reconstructive surgery. We report that fiscal viability for laser surgery services for secondary burn reconstruction is supported by: level 2 (one systematic review) level 4 evidence (2 studies) and level 5 evidence (expert reports). Evidence over 22 years from an established super-regional NHS laser centre shows that introduction of this service led to sustained and substantial cost saving, producing excellent surgical results at a fraction of the cost of traditional surgery. Analysis ofthe potential dollar-effect ofthese advantages to the general population supports state investment in expertise and capital equipment as a medium to long-term cost saving strategy, which may also aid re-integrating patients into the workforce making a meaningful contribution to the economy.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.en_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectBurns and scalds -- Patients -- Treatmenten_GB
dc.subjectWounds and injuries -- Infectionsen_GB
dc.subjectSkin -- Laser surgeryen_GB
dc.titleCutaneous laser surgery for secondary burn reconstruction : cost benefit analysisen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.burns.2019.08.021-
dc.publication.titleBurnsen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SAna

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0305417919303432-main.pdf647.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.