Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/71111
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-11T17:36:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-11T17:36:17Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationMifsud, A. J. (2009). Occupational health and safety law and jurisprudence : are we moving towards a strict liability approach? (Master's dissertation).en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/71111-
dc.descriptionLL.D.en_GB
dc.description.abstractThis thesis will attempt to investigate whether our law and Court cases reveal a trend towards the application of a regime of strict liability in the context of occupational health and safety. To this end, Chapter one will attempt to briefly examine the general outline of the duties of employers and employees under the relevant occupational health and safety laws. This will include a short comparison between the fragmented and piecemeal approach of the old laws with particular reference to the subsidiary legislation still in force today relating to the subject, and the modern comprehensive laws that were adopted by Malta pursuant to a number of directives of the European Union. At this point there will be a tentative reply as to whether there has been a move in our laws towards a higher degree of diligence that is required of employers. Chapter Two will commence by dealing with the problem as to the legal basis for the employer's liability - whether a claim can be based on tort, on contract or on both. It will then proceed to examine the traditional concept of the care and diligence to be exercised by the bonus paterfamilias, starting from the basics of the Civil Code, referring constantly to Court judgements in general, with specific focus on those that deal specifically with occupational health and safety. This analysis will become very relevant in Chapter Four when we will be able to draw comparisons between this traditional concept and the way it is being applied in practice. Chapter Three will deal with a general discussion of the concept of strict liability, analysing the all-embracing laws of France and the piece-meal approach adopted by England, comparing them to the Maltese situation. Having examined the general notions of fault-based and of strict-based systems of law, Chapter Four will examine whether the general trend is that of moving away from the traditional concept of fault towards a stricter form of liability. This will be done predominantly through an examination of recent judgements (post-1995). It will also include a comparison between the recent and the older judgements. Finally, the Conclusion will seek to suggest a series of possible changes in the general approach of the Courts and/or of the legislator.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_GB
dc.subjectIndustrial safetyen_GB
dc.subjectStrict liabilityen_GB
dc.subjectEmployers' liabilityen_GB
dc.titleOccupational health and safety law and jurisprudence : are we moving towards a strict liability approach?en_GB
dc.typemasterThesisen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Maltaen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentFaculty of Educationen_GB
dc.description.reviewedN/Aen_GB
dc.contributor.creatorMifsud, Anton John (2009)-
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 1958-2009

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mifsud_Anton John_2009.pdf
  Restricted Access
5.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.