Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/71877
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAzzopardi, Marthese-
dc.contributor.authorAzzopardi, Carmel-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-23T06:56:11Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-23T06:56:11Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationAzzopardi, M., & Azzopardi, C. (2021). Classification of Maltese biology examination questions using Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. Symposia Melitensia, 17, 107-122.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/71877-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the question types according to Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy in the final Paper 1 Advanced Biology examinations at a public post-secondary Institution and the National ones at the cognitive domain. The data of the study was obtained by examining the May/June 2017 and 2018 past papers. A total of 205 questions were analysed (97 Institution and 108 National). The questions were classified in terms of the cognitive levels of the Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. Data was given with tables as percentage. The study highlighted that not all objectives were present in every examination paper. The findings show that both types of examinations mostly include questions that do not promote higher levels of thinking. The Institution Paper 1 has two sections: Section A that tests the theoretical aspect, like the National examination while Section B tests the practical aspect. The highest percentage of questions in the National and Institution Section A examinations were from the remembering type of objective while from applying type in Section B. The percentage of questions in the cognitive domain, remembering type, were higher in the National examination. Analysis was also carried out to determine the marks being awarded to the different cognitive levels. When both examinations are considered, the bulk of the marks were in the remembering and understanding types of objectives. The percentage of marks allocated to the remembering type of objective in National examinations was 2.5X more in 2017 and 1.5X in 2018 than in the Institution Section A. In Section B, the applying type of objective was rewarded the highest marks. This study strongly highlights the narrow scope in terms of student achievement in high-stake examinations and shows how the present Maltese biology examination procedures promote low-level learning.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Malta. Junior Collegeen_GB
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_GB
dc.subjectBiology -- Classificationen_GB
dc.subjectBiology -- Examinationsen_GB
dc.subjectBloom, Benjamin S. (Benjamin Samuel), 1913-1999en_GB
dc.subjectBiology -- Study and teaching -- Maltaen_GB
dc.titleClassification of Maltese biology examination questions using Bloom’s Revised Taxonomyen_GB
dc.typearticleen_GB
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this work belongs to the author(s)/publisher. The rights of this work are as defined by the appropriate Copyright Legislation or as modified by any successive legislation. Users may access this work and can make use of the information contained in accordance with the Copyright Legislation provided that the author must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the copyright holder.en_GB
dc.description.reviewedpeer-revieweden_GB
dc.publication.titleSymposia Melitensiaen_GB
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - JCBio
Scholarly Works - JCPhy
SymMel, 2021, Volume 17
SymMel, 2021, Volume 17

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SM Vol 17 pp. 107-122 Azzopardi, Azzopardi.pdf744.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.