Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148456
Title: Development and validation of pharmacology concept inventory for concept-based learning : leveraging theory, expert insights, and student perspectives
Authors: Netere, Adeladlew K.
Hughes, Tony
Babey, Anna-Marie
Guilding, Clare
Restini, Carolina
Hawes, Martin
Kelly, John P.
Djouma, Elvan
Koenig, Jennifer
McLaughlin, Jacqueline E.
Olafuyi, Olusola
Fernandes, Lynette B.
Mifsud, Janet
Sills, Graeme J.
van Houwelingen, Anneke H.
Tucker, Steven J.
Liang, Willmann
Aronsson, Patrik
Khan, Farhan Ahmad
Hinton, Tina
Hernandez, Mark
Cormier, Lindsay
Kelly-Laubscher, Roisin
Caetano Crowley, Fabiana A.
Junqueira Santiago, Marina
Cunningham, Margaret
Richardson, Jennelle Durnett
Karpa, Kelly
White, Paul J.
Keywords: Pharmacology -- Study and teaching (Higher)
Concept learning
Medical education -- Evaluation
Medical students -- Attitudes
Psychometrics
Issue Date: 2026
Publisher: Wiley
Citation: Netere, A. K., Hughes, T., Babey, A. M., Guilding, C., Restini, C., Hawes, M.,...White, P. J. (2026). Development and validation of pharmacology concept inventory for concept‐based learning: leveraging theory, expert insights, and student perspectives. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives, 14(2), e70237.
Abstract: Misconceptions in pharmacology can undermine learning and compromise both clinical and scientific reasoning, yet few validated tools exist to identify them. Consequently, we developed and validated the Pharmacology Concept Inventory (PCI), which can be used to identify misconceptions, assess learning gains, and evaluate teaching effectiveness. This PCI was designed based on the IUPHAR-Education Section (IUPHAR-Ed) Core Concepts of Pharmacology Project, addressing eight core concepts: drug efficacy, drug-target interaction, steady-state concentration, structure–activity relationship, drug tolerance, drug bioavailability, volume of distribution, and drug clearance. A triangulated design strategy integrated theoretical frameworks, expert review, and student perspectives. Experts examined quality, content validity, and cognitive alignment. The pilot PCI was then administered to a student cohort to evaluate its psychometric properties, providing preliminary evidence for further refinement. Item-level content validity indices ranged from 0.67 to 1.00, with a scale-level average of 0.93. Seventy students completed the pilot survey, leading to the exclusion of items with low discrimination and reliability. Items on drug-target interaction were removed due to consistently poor performance. The final PCI included 26 items covering seven concepts, with strong discrimination indices (0.36–0.75) and difficulty indices (0.26–0.71). Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91), and concept-level reliability ranged from 0.64 to 0.85. The PCI provides strong evidence for identifying misconceptions and assessing learning outcomes through a pre–post-test approach. Although the PCI currently addresses only a subset of concepts, continued refinements informed by surveys and interviews will enhance its utility and expand its scope for concept-based learning and curriculum evaluation.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/148456
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SCPT



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.