Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/28562
Title: Complicity of corporations in grave breaches of human rights constituting core crimes
Authors: Cachia, Sarah
Keywords: Criminal liability of juristic persons
Corporation law -- Criminal provisions
Corporations -- Corrupt practices
Issue Date: 2017
Abstract: Corporations play an essential part in violations of human rights which amount to core crimes. Looking back to the Second World War, one will observe that no one person alone could commit the atrocities produced. There will be no mass killings with the use of gas, or bombs, or armaments if corporations do not supply military groups or rebel forces with such produce. However, corporations involved in breaches of human rights are not limited to the supply of such products. A number of corporations make profit from the extraction industry which is renowned for grave violations of human rights. Although corporations may play an important role in such abuses, they are generally not the primary perpetrators of the crimes, but rather act as secondary perpetrators without even having a direct connection with the crime. This thesis will analyse the possibility of holding corporations accountable for their participation in grave breaches of human rights. The main issue upon which the study revolves is that the ICC Rome Statute does not have jurisdiction over legal persons. In order to find a possible solution, the elements of corporate criminal liability and complicity are analysed to establish whether they may be attributed to a legal person. Moreover, a comparative analysis is undertaken in order to establish what provisions already exist in certain jurisdictions, namely the United States, Canada, and some Western European Countries. A number of judicial fora are also analysed to expand the possibility of corporate criminal liability at an international law level through national courts, or international tribunals or courts. The ICC is chosen as the preferred forum, without excluding the possibility of having specific international tribunals, because of the principle of complementarity which affords primacy to domestic courts.
Description: LL.D.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/28562
Appears in Collections:Dissertations - FacLaw - 2017
Dissertations - FacLawCri - 2017
Dissertations - FacLawInt - 2017

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
17LLD025.pdf
  Restricted Access
2.26 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.