Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: United States and European Union evolving approaches in Southeast Asia : moving closer to convergence or divergence?
Authors: Pennisi di Floristella, Angela Maria
Keywords: European Union countries -- Foreign relations -- Southeast Asia
United States -- Foreign relations -- Southeast Asia
Association of Southeast Asian Nations
European Union countries -- Commercial policy
United States -- Commercial policy
National security -- European Union countries
National security -- United States
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
Citation: Pennisi di Floristella, A. (2019). United States and European Union evolving approaches in southeast Asia: moving closer to convergence or divergence?. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 38(2), 172-193.
Abstract: With the launch of Barack Obama’s strategic rebalance to Asia-Pacific, there has been a widening of the United States’ military, economic, and diplomatic presence in the Southeast Asian region. Likewise, it is clear that Southeast Asia is currently a region of relevant interest for both the United States and the European Union (EU). Surprisingly, however, up to the present, a systematic comparison of their approaches in the region has been largely lacking. To fill this void, this article compares US and EU interests, strategies, and main instruments of cooperation in Southeast Asia. Special attention is paid to the main developments that occurred in the United States, from Obama’s announcement of a strategic rebalance to Asia-Pacific to Donald Trump’s National Security Strategy, and in the EU, with the release there of the 2012 “Updated East Asia Policy Guidelines.” Examining whether the EU and the United States are moving towards a greater convergence of intent is of crucial importance for identifying opportunities for the further development of the transatlantic relationship in Southeast Asia. This article argues, though, that despite some apparent common traits in the US’s and the EU’s intentions, their strategies and instruments ultimately differ substantially – reflecting divergent paths. This creates crucial impediments to any further development of transatlantic cooperation in Southeast Asia.
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacArtIR

Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.