Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/111377
Title: The kinematics of fixed-seat rowing : a structured synthesis
Authors: Agius, Tonio P.
Cerasola, Dario
Gauci, Michael
Sciriha, Anabel
Sillato, Darren
Formosa, Cynthia
Gatt, Alfred
Xerri de Caro, John
Needham, Robert
Chockalingam, Nachiappan
Grima, Joseph N.
Keywords: Kinematics -- Malta -- Case studies
Muscles -- Motility -- Malta -- Case studies
Human mechanics -- Analysis
Rowing -- Technique -- Malta -- Evaluation
Biomechanics -- Data processing
Issue Date: 2023
Publisher: MDPI AG
Citation: Agius, T. P., Cerasola, D., Gauci, M., Sciriha, A., Sillato, D., Formosa, C.,...Grima, J. N. (2023). The Kinematics of Fixed-Seat Rowing: A Structured Synthesis. Bioengineering, 10(7), 774.
Abstract: Olympic-style sliding-seat rowing is a sport that has been extensively researched, with studies investigating aspects related to the physiology, biomechanics, kinematics, and the performance of rowers. In contrast, studies on the more classic form of fixed-seat rowing are sparse. The aim of this study is to address this lacuna by analysing for the first time the specific kinematics of fixed-seat rowing as practised by able-bodied athletes, thus (i) documenting how this technique is performed in a manner that is replicable by others and (ii) showing how this technique compares and contrasts with the more standard sliding-seat technique. Fixed-seat rowing was replicated in a biomechanics laboratory where experienced fixed-seat rowers, marked with reflective markers following the modified Helen–Hayes model, were asked to row in a manner that mimics rowing on a fixed-seat boat. The findings from this study, complimented with data gathered through the observation of athletes rowing on water, were compared to sliding-seat ergometer rowing and other control experiments. The results show that, in fixed-seat rowing, there is more forward and backward thoracic movement than in sliding-seat rowing (75–77° vs. 44–52°, p < 0.0005). Tilting of the upper body stems was noted to result from rotations around the pelvis, as in sliding-seat rowing, rather than from spinal movements. The results also confirmed knee flexion in fixed-seat rowing with a range of motion of 30–35°. This is less pronounced than in standard-seat rowing, but not insignificant. These findings provide a biomechanical explanation as to why fixed-seat rowers do not have an increased risk of back injuries when compared with their sliding-seat counterparts. They also provide athletes, coaches, and related personnel with precise and detailed information of how fixed-seat rowing is performed so that they may formulate better and more specific evidence-based training programs to meliorate technique and performance.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/111377
Appears in Collections:Scholalry Works - FacHScPhy
Scholarly Works - FacHScPod

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The kinematics of fixed seat rowing a structured synthesis 2023.pdf3.5 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.