Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/128181
Title: Research ethics training, challenges, and suggested improvements across Europe : radiography research ethics standard for Europe (RRESFE)
Authors: Bockhold, S.
McNulty, Jonathan P.
Abdurakman, E.
Bezzina, Paul
Drey, N.
England, Andrew
Flinton, D.
Khine, R.
McEntee, M.
Mekiš, N.
Precht, H.
Rainford, Louise
Sá dos Reis, C.
Santos, A.
Syrgiamiotis, V.
Willis, S.
Woodley, J.
Beardmore, Charlotte A.
Harris, R.
O'Regan, Malamateniou
T., C.
Keywords: Research -- Moral and ethical aspects -- Case studies
Radiography -- Case Reports
Radiography -- Study and teaching
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd.
Citation: Bockhold, S., McNulty, J., Abdurakman, E., Bezzina, P., Drey, N., England, A., ... & Malamateniou, C. (2022). Research ethics training, challenges, and suggested improvements across Europe: Radiography research ethics standard for Europe (RRESFE). Radiography, 28(4), 1016-1024.
Abstract: Introduction: The Radiography Research Ethics Standards for Europe (RRESFE) project aimed to provide a cross-sectional view of the current state of radiography research ethics across Europe. This included investigating education and training in research ethics, and identifying the key challenges and potential improvements associated with using existing research ethics frameworks. Methods: This cross-sectional online survey targeting radiography researchers in Europe was conducted between April 26 and July 12, 2021. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used to identify research ethics education and training trends. Content analysis of qualitative responses was employed to identify significant challenges and proposed improvements in research ethics frameworks of practice. Results: There were 232 responses received across 33 European countries. Most (n = 132; 57%) respondents had received some research ethics training; however, fewer participants had received training on safeguarding vulnerable patients (n = 72; 38%), diversity and inclusivity (n = 62; 33%), or research with healthy volunteers (n = 60; 32%). Training was associated with a greater perceived importance of the need for research ethics review (p = 0.031) and with the establishment of EQF Level 6 training (p = 0.038). The proportion of formally trained researchers also varied by region (p = <0.001). Time-to-ethics-approval was noted as the biggest challenge for professionals making research ethics applications. Conclusion: Early and universal integration of research-oriented teaching within the radiography education framework which emphasises research ethics is recommended. Additionally, study findings suggest research ethics committee application and approval processes could be further simplified and streamlined.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/128181
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacHScRad

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Research_ethics_training_challenges_and_suggested_improvements_across_Europe.pdf588.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.