Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/128293
Title: Gonad contact shielding in digital radiography : a questionnaire survey
Authors: Cardoso, Carlos Eduardo Martins Dias
Bezzina, Paul
Portelli, Jonathan L.
Keywords: Gonads
Patients -- Care
Radiation
Shielding (Radiation)
Patients -- Safety measures
Radiography, Medical -- Digital techniques
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Citation: Cardosa, C.E.M.D., Bezzina, P., & Portelli, J.L. (2022). Gonad contact shielding in digital radiography: A questionnaire survey. European Journal of Radiology, 158, 110620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110620.
Abstract: Purpose: The use of gonad contact shielding (GCS) in radiology departments has varied across countries, possibly because, until recently, there was no agreed consensus with mixed evidence supporting its use. This study aims to explore radiographers’ use and opinion on GCS in digital radiography (DR) and to evaluate whether radiographers’ use of GCS is associated with their gender, highest educational qualification, and/or years of experience. Method: An online survey was sent via email to potential participants through the Society of Medical Radiographers Malta (SRM) as well as social media posts on local radiography pages. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the collected data. Results: Almost half of the registered radiographers working in radiology departments in Malta (n = 101/203) completed the survey (49.7 % response rate). 61.4 % of participating radiographers indicated they ‘often’ use GCS in some patients, with 56.4 % stating they perceive GCS as an effective tool to protect the gonads from radiation exposure in DR. Equally, 56.4 % claimed that GCS use is guided by local rules and/or departmental protocols. While 58.4 % indicated that patients’ gender does not impact their use of GCS, patients’ age does influence their use. No statistically significant association was noted between radiographers’ likeliness of using GCS and their gender, highest educational qualification, and/or years of experience. Conclusions: Some misconceptions and uncertainties among radiographers concerning the benefits and risks of using GCS were noted. Local radiology departments should look into their protocols and assess the need for an update aligned with the latest recommendations.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/128293
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacHScRad

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Gonad_contact_shielding_in_digital_radiography.pdf
  Restricted Access
744.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.