Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/129313
Title: Optimisation of energy and life cycle costs via building envelope : a BIM approaches
Authors: Altaf, Muhammad
Alalaoul, Wesam Salah
Musarat, Muhamamad Ali
Abdelaziz, Abdelaziz Abdelmahmoud
Thaheem, Muhammad Jamaluddin
Keywords: Life cycle costing
Construction industry -- Costs
Building information modeling
Construction industry -- Information resources management
Buildings -- Performance
Architecture and energy conservation
Issue Date: 2024
Publisher: Springer Dordrecht
Citation: Altaf, M., Alalaoul, W. S., Musarat, M. A., Abdelaziz, A. A., & Thaheem, M. J. (2024). Optimisation of energy and life cycle costs via building envelope: a BIM approaches. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(3), 7105-7128.
Abstract: A surge in energy demand driven by the growing number of buildings and insufficient attention to sustainable and optimised energy-saving procedures are likely to threaten the economy and the environment. The building envelope is a significant component that influences energy requirements, directly affecting the operations costs. Thus, the current study considers the envelope to optimise the building’s Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and enhance energy efficiency. Therefore, to achieve the aim of the study, Building Information Modelling (BIM) with the integration of Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) is adopted to assess the building envelope and optimise energy use and relevant costs. Three alternatives of wall system: brick wall with rockwool insulation, brick wall with polystyrene insulation and curtain walls system, are considered for the building envelope to enhance energy-saving potential by analysing and comparing the energy demand. To determine LCCA, the Net Present Value (NPV) approach was adopted for the initial expenditure and the associated future costs. It was found that utilising insulation material with low thermal conductivity reduces heating and cooling energy resulting optimised LCC. Compared to curtain walls, the results show that the rockwool insulated wall reduces 17% of energy demand while the polystyrene wall reduces 12.7% of the energy. Similarly, rockwool insulated walls save 5% energy relative to the wall system with polystyrene insulation. Thus, integrating LCCA with the BIM approach at the conceptual design stages promotes energy and LCC optimisation.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/129313
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacBenCPM

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Optimisation_of_energy_and_life_cycle_costs_via_building_envelope_a_BIM_approaches_2024.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.